Sentences with phrase «against continued warming»
Firstly, I've still not found a sceptic who is prepared to bet against continued warming at the IPCC - predicted 0.15 C / decade.
http://julesandjames.blogspot.ru/ Not exact matches
A failure to get any points from their clash against the champions will continue to leave them in the relegation zone, although this player reckons they are just keeping 18th spot warm for someone else at the moment.
Mojib Latif responded that the continued warming did not speak against their study; one should look at this long term and not attach too much significance to a few years.
Gore's call to «make peace with the planet» requires an integrated awareness and action against both global warming and global warring, simultaneously — Gore describes the problem as huge, but in limiting it to civilian activities, not including military madness and mayhem, it is not huge enough — if a patient has both diabetes and severe trauma, both conditions must be treated now — militization trumps civilization in the headlines of today and tomorrow — if the truth is that both global warming everywhere and global warring anywhere are linked in the human biosphere, and if that truth is inconvenient to Mr Gore and the civilian scope of his campaign against global warming, lethal consequences for both humans and other species will continue — in cinematic terms, the great «An Inconvenient Truth» must be blended and coordinated with the great «Why We Fight»
A discussion of the November 2009 Climatic Research Unit e-mail hacking incident, referred to by some sources as «Climategate,» continues against the backdrop of the abortive UN Climate Conference in Copenhagen (COP15) discussing alternative agreements to replace the 1997 Kyoto Protocol that aimed to combat global warming.
As the science continues to mount up against AGW (i.e. latest Aqua satellite data supporting «negative» feedback and GISS, UAH, RSS, Hadley data showing no warming since 1998 and a trend towards cooling), I see «doubters» getting rounder and rounder, and Pachauri, Gore, Hansen, et al getting flatter and flatter.
«These tax credits are essential to the continued growth of wind energy, to the economic and energy security of the United States, and to a successful beginning in the fight against global warming,» said Wetstone.
It's, however, equally wrong to claim that this period is strong evidence against AGW or against the expectation that in longer term the warming will continue.
12, 1987) The Ocean in Human Affairs (Paragon House, 1989) The Universe and Its Origin: From Ancient Myths to Present Reality and Future Fantasy (Paragon House, 1990) Global Climate Change: Human and Natural Influences (Paragon House, 1989) The Greenhouse Debate Continued (ICS Press, 1992) The Scientific Case Against the Global Climate Treaty (SEPP, 1997) Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming's Unfinished Debate, (The Independent Institute, 1997)
On the eve of the U.S. elections, a number of pundits and leaders — including Pope Francis — continue to warn Americans against an undefined «politics of fear,» while simultaneously spreading the fear of the nebulous enemy of «global warming.»
While the climate science establishment continues its costly and misallocated efforts against «catastrophic» global warming, the empirical evidence indicates the worlds» elites are pursuing a laughably ludicrous Don Quixote quest against an imaginary climate - evil.
While the brash brand of direct interference into the public discourse on scientific findings about global warming and associated harmful impacts we saw from Exxon operatives in the 1980s and 1990s has now morphed into a more passive, less - visible form of tampering — such as the company's continued stream of donations (some alleged to be illegal) to groups known for lobbying against and often shooting down federal and state - level proposals to promote renewable energy and limit carbon emissions — perhaps Avery will be able to persuade the new corporate leadership team to stop funding these groups altogether.
Of course the gas at the bottom does not know it is at the bottom of a tall column but it knows that there is warmer gas above and so it cant move upward This is because the gas cant move upward against an inversion without an outside driver The heat transfer can not continue without this input.
«Climate science» as it is used by warmists implies adherence to a set of beliefs: (1) Increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will warm the Earth's surface and atmosphere; (2) Human production of CO2 is producing significant increases in CO2 concentration; (3) The rate of rise of temperature in the 20th and 21st centuries is unprecedented compared to the rates of change of temperature in the previous two millennia and this can only be due to rising greenhouse gas concentrations; (4) The climate of the 19th century was ideal and may be taken as a standard to compare against any current climate; (5) global climate models, while still not perfect, are good enough to indicate that continued use of fossil fuels at projected rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The global average temperature under this condition will rise more than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only alternative to such a disaster is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions (reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 resulting in significant damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world population that is increasingly industrializing.
I would really like to see an analysis of how CO2 was supposed to have continued the warming against the break in the general trend from the 80s to 1998.
I will continue to fight for the health of the waters off of New England and the United States, and against the dangerous effects of global warming on oceans everywhere.
Although multiple studies demonstrate that the overwhelming majority of climate scientists conclude that this exceptional recent warming is caused by humans, obstinate deniers will continue to insist, against all evidence, that the consensus on climate change is crumbling.
The release of the report by the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) last month threw into stark relief the clear message on anthropogenic global warming and sounded the direst of warnings against our continued [continue reading...]
People have been putting in efforts to improve a different source of energy by harnessing the sun's potential, all while continuing the fight against the bad effects of global warming.
For one of many good demonstrations that the recent slowdown (which, importantly, is «slow» only relative to immediately preceding «fast» warming — that's a hint for you) in no way is evidence against the continuing long term trend, see climate statistician Tamino's recent post «Slowdown Skeptic,» and «It's the Trend, Stupid,» and «Is Earth's Temperature About to Soar?»
Wide oak flooring is continued through into the adjoining living room to warm up the cool décor, with a distressed wood dining table that stands out against the sleek white units.