The Bureau's complaint alleges that Aria and his businesses violated the Dodd - Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act's prohibition
against deceptive acts and practices by misleading consumers about their services.
Not exact matches
While no suit has been officially filed, bidding documents from the Attorney General's office indicate that the state is preparing to hire outside counsel for «commencing legal action
against Theranos, Inc. and its closely related subsidiaries for violations of the Arizona Consumer Fraud
Act arising out of Theranos Inc.'s long - running scheme of
deceptive acts and misrepresentations relating to the capabilities and operation of Theranos blood testing equipment.»
A CFPB spokesperson said in an email to Vox that the bureau is authorized to take «supervisory and enforcement action
against certain institutions engaged in unfair,
deceptive, or abusive
acts or practices, or that otherwise violate federal consumer financial laws,» including the failure of institutions to engage in «reasonable data security practices» in connection with consumer report information.
The complaint seeks «a declarative judgment that defendant's publishing contracts violate the Maryland Consumer Protection
Act,» including the MCPA's prohibition
against deceptive trade practices.
is an
act setting up laws designed to stop debt collectors from using any abusive, disruptive, and
deceptive debt collection practices
against you to collect an outstanding debt.
And since the passage of the Dodd - Frank
Act, regulators have much more authority to go after unfair and
deceptive practices and bring enforcement actions
against bad actors, should the need arise.
Enforcement Action Pursuant to the Dodd - Frank
Act, the CFPB has the authority to take action
against institutions or individuals engaging in unfair,
deceptive, or abusive
acts or practices or that otherwise violate federal consumer financial laws.
The CFPB concluded that the company and its affiliates violated the Dodd - Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act's prohibitions
against unfair and
deceptive acts and practices, and also the Fair Debt Collection Practices
Act.
For example, if a not - for - profit credit repair organization is charging consumers advance payments and failing to deliver services to the consumer, the FTC
act's prohibitions
against «
deceptive» or «misleading» practices could be enforced
against this conduct, even if a prosecution pursuant to CROA is unsuccessful based on its specific prohibition
against advance payments.
The question presented is whether a collection letter sent to collect a time - barred debt that makes a «settlement offer» to accept payment «in settlement of» the debt could violate the
Act's general prohibition
against «any false,
deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt.»
Pennsylvania attorney general Josh Shapiro filed the suit
against Navient Corp. on Thursday with suspected widespread abuses and
deceptive acts on loan administration.
Fair Debt Collection Practices
Act (FDCPA - 1977) protects you
against harmful,
deceptive practices used by some debt collectors.
Numerous laws were violated including President Obama's Dodd - Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act's Prohibitions
against unfair,
deceptive, or abusive
acts and practices.
Obtained judgment for plaintiff on Texas
Deceptive Trade Practices
Act claims
against HVAC company for misrepresentations concerning company's goods and services
First - chair trial experience defending global chemical manufacturer
against breach of contract,
Deceptive Trade Practices
Act, and product defect claims involving automotive industrial coatings product
The
Act provides that the terms of an order
against someone who has engaged in
deceptive marketing practices, including an AMP order, must be «determined with a view to promoting conduct by that person that is in conformity with the purposes of this Part and not with a view to punishment».
Represented a Spanish language radio syndication in action
against competition for violations of Florida's
Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices
Act.
As Lyle Denniston discussed in this analysis at SCOTUSBlog, the 5th Circuit threw out a class action
against various banks and brokerage firms for transactions related to Enron's defrauding of investors, finding that «the banks and brokerage firms had not engaged in a «
deceptive act» under securities fraud law.
Chapter 93A protects the public
against «[u] nfair methods of competition and unfair or
deceptive acts or practices,» and authorizes consumers to sue businesses engaging in such activities.
Defeated class certification of Florida
Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices
Act (FDUTPA) and implied warranty claims in federal court cases involving claims
against airplane part manufacturer and dental implant manufacturer; Defense of automotive class actions has led to several appellate decisions making certification of such claims very difficult in Florida.
Even aside from the consent decree, this harvesting plainly violated the Federal Trade Commission
Act's prohibition
against «
deceptive acts or practices.»
First, the State Attorney General has filed a groundbreaking complaint
against the infamous scanner troll MPHJ Technology, alleging unfair and
deceptive acts under Vermont's Consumer Protection
Act (PDF of the complaint).
This behavior has gotten the attention of state attorneys general, starting with Vermont, who filed a complaint in May
against the same now infamous «scanner troll» (MPHJ Technology), alleging unfair and
deceptive acts under Vermont's Consumer Protection
Act (PDF of the complaint).
The Dodd - Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act signed into federal law by President Barack Obama in 2010 authorized the creation of the CFPB which has the authority to take action
against institutions or individuals engaging in unfair,
deceptive, or abusive
acts or practices or violating federal consumer financial laws.
In one of three active lawsuits
against Trump, a state attorney general is accusing the real estate mogul's now - defunct school of «engaging in specific fraudulent,
deceptive and illegal
acts.»
The buyer filed a lawsuit
against the salespeople and the brokerage under the state's
Deceptive Trade Practices
Act.
In Hagans v. Woodruff, the Court of Appeals of Texas addressed a buyer's allegations of negligent misrepresentation and violations of the Texas
Deceptive Trade Practice
Act (DPTA)
against a broker.
The allegations
against the Seller were for breach of contract, misrepresentation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, while it was alleged that the Brokerage breached the state's unfair or
deceptive trade practices
act («Act»
act («
Act»
Act»).
In addition, the FTC will continue to enforce the Rule and Section 5 of the FTC
Act, which prohibits unfair and
deceptive practices,
against all other providers of mortgage assistance relief services.