Sentences with phrase «against decisions concerning»

Not exact matches

What if the family is against your decision, and they are not bothered by mixing in this business concern?

The 7 - 2 decision (Justices Côté and Rowe dissented, finding that there were alternatives available, the order is ineffective, and expressing concern that the «temporary» injunction was effectively permanent) is not a surprise — last week's Facebook's decision suggested a willingness to side with the weaker Canadian litigant against Internet giants — but the decision will ultimately grant Google more power, not less.

This unfortunately dismisses the central lesson to be drawn from the awkward transition that resulted from my 2009 decision to stress - test our methods against Depression - era data, not to mention the fact that concerns similar to my present ones were rather stunningly vindicated over the completion of prior market cycles.

Although the family physician usually should be the key person in arranging treatment of the mentally ill person, the minister occasionally has an important role in counseling with the family concerning their decision about whether or not to hospitalize the individual against his will.

But that doesn't mean that this is a problem that can be seriously addressed by mounting witch - hunts against senior clergy for what they did or failed to do 40 years ago - particularly when it is absolutely clear that they had no direct responsibility for making decisions in the particular case concerned.

«As there were a number of pig producers who voted against this decision, we have justifiable concerns at their willingness to comply with this voluntary phase out even by 2017.

As the team turns its focus on FA Cup and the League, there are growing concerns amongst the Gunner faithful that the recent spate of injuries and the number of referee decisions going against the team could derail their quest for a trophy.

Mignolet is expected to continue in between the sticks for Sunday's game against Burnley, with Klopp's main selection decision concerning centre - back Dejan Lovren who has yet to return to the first team.

I will refer in particular to three criticisms highlighted in the report: the slowness to remove foreign national prisoners from the UK, the concern with the high rate of appeals brought against UKBA's decisions which are decided against the Agency, and the large number of unresolved immigration cases still awaiting decision.

The Grahama decision comes amid heightened concerns over the policing in the United State, the interactions between police and minorities and whether local elected district attorneys are able to pursue indictments against police officers in such incidents.

Abass said the function of the committee was simply to examine the allegations levelled against Banire by concerned members of the party, saying the committee would be fair in arriving at its decision which would then be submitted to the ward executive of the party for onward delivery to the local government and then the state executive of the APC.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo's recent decision to ban fracking shines a spotlight on the balancing act governments in potentially oil - and gas - rich regions face weighing economic benefits against environmental concerns.

Six months later, however the council decided to go against its original decision and classify methylamphetamine as a class A drug - something the committee warns proves its lack of coherent criteria, and shows a tendency to respond to media concern.

He said the government was feeling the «pressure» of citizens against its decision on the agreement and so wanted to redirect their concerns to less sensitive matters such as the renaming of the seat of government.

Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) on Thursday berated the Christian Association of Nigeria, CAN, for kicking against the decision of the Federal Government to float a SUKUK...

But other prominent Republicans expressed concern that Ms. Scozzafava's decision seemed likely to encourage conservatives going into next year's midterm elections to mount primary challenges against Republican candidates whom they consider too moderate, particularly if Mr. Hoffman wins on Tuesday.

She said: «Already Labour is responding to people's concerns about jobs and public services and mobilising against Tory / Lib Dem decisions which will harm this country.

Caretaker Labour leader Harriet Harman also questioned the coalition's spending cuts: «Already Labour is responding to people's concerns about jobs and public services and mobilising against Tory / Lib Dem decisions which will harm this country.

The court ruled against Newcastle in 2010, and upheld their decision last week, ruling that the safety concerns were unlikely to come to fruition and the IP concerns were «borderline.»

One of the most contentious and closely scrutinized decisions before the FDA concerns Provenge, a proposed therapeutic vaccine made by Dendreon for use against prostate cancer.

Although the federal labor policy contained in Taft - Hartley is not to be ignored, the paramount concern must be with the public policy against racial discrimination which is reflected in civil rights legislation and in the Court's New Negro Alliance decision, which immunized racial - labor disputes from injunctions under NorrisLa Guardia long before the advent of civil rights legislation»...

If this is aimed at me, I believe I clarified already that my concern was not researcher bias pro-AGW, but policy - maker bias against incorporating uncertainty into decision - making.

This was an appeal against a decision of Bean J to reject a judicial review of the Parking Adjudicator's decision in a test case concerning the effect of alleged defects in traffic signs and road markings on the liability to pay the penalty charge (a parking ticket).

The decision in Vinod Chopra Films Private Limited et al. v. John Doe 2010 FC 387 by Hughes, J. concerns a review of a «rolling» Anton Piller order granted by the Federal Court of Canada in a copyright infringement case to an Indian film production company and its Canadian licensee against various un-named persons who (according to the claim) «deal in counterfeit video recordings.»

In April 2014 the Commission had issued two decisions on the issue, one against Motorola and another one concerning Samsung (the latter was a commitments decision).

For the purposes of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), the jurisdiction of the Court is limited in the Treaties to whether Art. 40 TEU has been respected and to the review of legality of certain decisions taken based on Art. 275 (2) TFEU, the latter concerning essentially legal actions brought against the legality of decisions on restrictive measures against natural and legal persons taken by the Council.

The case concerned a compromise under Part 14 of the Companies Act 1993 that was set aside by the High Court on the basis that the challenging creditors, who had voted against the compromise, had been unfairly prejudiced by the decision to call only one meeting of creditors.

The author concludes by identifying some important points that French courts should tackle in the future, that is, the admissibility of challenges against decisions rendered by arbitral institutions, and their role in the proceedings concerning challenges against arbitral awards.

I think this case is of interest to ABlawg readers because it involves the judicial review of a mineral royalty decision and it also concerns appellate - level consideration of the standard of review applicable to a ministerial decision — a topic of recent interest in the judiciary and which Professor Olszynski explores in his recent ABlawg post «Of Killer Whales, Sage - grouse, and the Battle Against (Madisonian) Tyranny».

«TCC claims 2.1 The following are examples of the types of claim which it may be appropriate to bring as TCC claims --(a) building or other construction disputes, including claims for the enforcement of the decisions of adjudicators under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996; (b) engineering disputes; (c) claims by and against engineers, architects, surveyors, accountants and other specialised advisers relating to the services they provide; (d) claims by and against local authorities relating to their statutory duties concerning the development of land or the construction of buildings; (e) claims relating to the design, supply and installation of computers, computer software and related network systems; (f) claims relating to the quality of goods sold or hired, and work done, materials supplied or services rendered; (g) claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant; (h) claims between neighbours, owners and occupiers of land in trespass, nuisance etc; (i) claims relating to the environment (for example, pollution cases); (j) claims arising out of fires; (k) claims involving taking of accounts where these are complicated; and (l) challenges to decisions of arbitrators in construction and engineering disputes including applications for permission to appeal and appeals.»

The particular decision, York University v. Michael Markicevic, 2013 ONSC 4311, involves a request by one defendant to discharge a certificate of pending litigation registered against her real property and is part of a larger action by York against Markicevic and others concerning their alleged misuse of university resources.

Having reviewed the European Charter and the lower court's decision in Goldeneye (International) Ltd v Telefonica Ltd [2012] EWHC 723 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 79 (Jul), his lordship concluded that many of the established principles for the grant of a Norwich Pharmacal order were relevant to the assessment of whether disclosure was proportionate under Art 8; the court's duty was to weigh the benefit of the information being sought by the RFU against the effect the disclosure was likely to have on the individual (s) concerned.

While today's decision upholds the worldwide order against Google, it nevertheless reflects many of the freedom of expression concerns CCLA had voiced in our interventions in this case.

On the same day the OPC decision was released, the FTC announced that it was settling charges filed by the U.S. Department of Justice on behalf of the FTC against VTech USA for violating the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act by collecting personal information from children without providing direct notice to parents (including prominently displaying links to online notices of information practices with regard to children on the home page or screen of its website or online services and at each area of the website or online service where personal information is collected) or obtaining verifiable consent concerning its information collection practices.

For example, the decision removes the age - old antipathy courts had against «privacy» concerns as justification for limitations on open justice.

In Common Services Agency v Scottish Information Commissioner [2008] UKHL 47 the House of Lords made a groundbreaking decision in favour of the Common Services Agency (CSA) in a case it had brought against the Scottish information commissioner (SIC), concerning the provision of anonymised personal data in response to a freedom of information request.

The article starts off with «A recent Supreme Court of Canada decision concerning a libel suit against a radio host referred to the changing attitudes surrounding public comment and defamation... [more]

Their view accords with my own in any event but, in my judgement, therefore, the decisions of the English Courts do create an issue estoppel against the Defendant in raising the argument that the waiver is insufficient where recognition, enforcement and execution are concerned.

In this case the Supreme Court allowed an appeal against an initial decision that care proceedings concerning two young girls should be transferred to Hungary.

In Canada (Attorney General) v. Hicks, 2015 FC 599 (CanLII) the Federal Court heard an appeal concerning the validity of a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal («CHRT») decision which held that the Human Resources and Skills Development Canada («HRSDC») discriminated against its employee on the basis of family status.

The majority began its decision by noting that the preamble of the 1992 amendments to the Criminal Code «expresses concern about the prevalence of sexual assault against women and children and was intended to ensure the full protection of their Charter rights.

(a) any court or tribunal of that State against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law may request the Court of Justice to give a preliminary ruling on a question raised in a case pending before it and concerning the validity or interpretation of an act referred to in paragraph 1 if that court or tribunal considers that a decision on the question is necessary to enable it to give judgment; or

In a judgment handed down on 4 November 2015, the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against a decision of the Upper Tribunal concerning the rights of EU citizens to bring non-EU family members into the UK.

Court decisions against Mattel and Fisher - Price illustrate how lead poisoning can still be out of the control of the federal government and concerned parents.

LNT & Partners acted for Unilever Asia Private and Unilever Vietnam International in a dispute resolution case against Chan Thuan Thanh Plastic Mechanical Trading (CTT) concerning the client's decision to terminate a purchasing agreement with CTT because of underperformance.

A cluster of recent Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decisions concerned employers» appeals against tribunal decisions on the basis that the tribunal had substituted its own view for that of the employer out of sympathy for the employee.

CCLA is deeply concerned for Canadians and Canadian residents who may be affected by today's United States Supreme Court decision to re-instate a modified version of President Trump's travel ban against individuals from six predominantly Muslim countries.

The appeal court said in its decision that the personal concerns of public embarrassment are not enough by themselves to justify non-publication or sealing orders and said assessing emotional distress versus emotional harm is a matter of degree to be measured against the media's right to report on court proceedings.

If you're concerned that including your photo could cause people to discriminate against you, I urge you to carefully weigh the benefits and drawbacks of the profile photo before making a final decision.

If there are true issues and concerns regarding the other parent, you must gather evidence and witness which document the concerns and incidents which you hope will ultimately sway a judge into making a decision which they are generally biased against making.