Sentences with phrase «against deep teams»

The major difference between Arsenal and Chelsea against deep teams isn't that Chelsea give up possession to sit on their box and then counter but that they have multiple ways to stretch and penetrate.
With just 5 guys in the rotation against the deep Team Malvin squad, they just couldn't keep up..
A team that relies heavily on just 5 - 6 players for most of the game will be at a disadvantage against a deeper team, especially in the later rounds of the tournament.

Not exact matches

Against teams that we expect to defend deep and frustrate us I think we will use the pacier full backs and more creativity, like this:
Against us, the other teams fight and we have to dig deep every time to win the games.
Having two pro-active, sweeping CB's may prove very effective against the teams who will sit deep and look to exploit the counter.
But with teams who are defending deep against us we need a big man upfront who can draw the defenders and make more space for others.
They were thrown in at the deep end having had little match time and then expected to perform against the best team in the World (possibly).
They once again had to play with 5 guys and just couldn't endure the grueling 44 - minutes against the deep bench of Team James - Hagari.
If you watch Ozil, and Arsenal, you can tell he's needed against weaker teams that sit deep, but against the big boys, we struggle, and he struggles.
And now it has to face the team that got its deep - ball groove back against Michigan.
However, when you dig deeper you will see that both Team Maione and Team Wong went 2 - 0 head to head against Teams Malvin and Zimmerman..
Nickelbacks who play against slot receivers have become more valuable, but NFL teams still crave players who can line up in press coverage and take away entire deep sectors of the field.
The FA needs to put every referee through a polygraph test to know if they have deep roots for or against certain teams to completely avoid bias and corruption for starters.
Three of those home runs were hit in extra innings — Jose Altuve and Carlos Correa each took Josh Fields deep in the 10th, and George Springer hit a two - run shot against Brandon McCarthy that proved to be the game - winner in the 11th — the first time any team has hit three home runs in extra innings of a postseason contest.
Beating West Ham comfortably is one thing, but their performance against Manchester United last month, where they looked totally limp from kickoff onwards, was a reminder that being able to punish small teams that sit deep and let you have the ball is a great quality for a team to have, but it is not enough to win a league on its own.
It is very trendy to pick against Villanova in this bracket, especially after last year's Wildcats succumbed to a UConn team not entirely unlike N.C. State in the second round, but this is a better «Nova, and I think this team goes deep.
Against smaller teams we can attack with ramsey and against the bigger teams we hold a bit more with wilshire who can be a deep laying playAgainst smaller teams we can attack with ramsey and against the bigger teams we hold a bit more with wilshire who can be a deep laying playagainst the bigger teams we hold a bit more with wilshire who can be a deep laying play maker.
the problem against big team especially against Mou is with Wenger, Mou messes with Wenger's head n makes him make some annoying decisions that makes no sense like all of a sudden starting Elneny as CM, one who couldn't even dictate play from deep against Sunderland n benching Xhaka who has this ability n has shown it over n over.
Please go and watch Borussia Dortmund, Mourinho teams like Inter Milan, Chelsea etc and how they play against deep defenses before coming here and spouting false absolution's about football with presumptuously.
On a side note, I couldn't help but think 2 predominant thoughts when watching the game against Bournemouth on the weekend: (1) Wenger is still willing to put his own personal agenda ahead of the team's best interests when it comes to team selection, which luckily for us didn't cost us the 3 points this time and (2) if Eddie Howe is earmarked to be the successor we are in deep trouble because he's simply a poor man's version of our present manager, as he's tactically inept and has an even worse road record.
Walcott CAN play as a CF, just not against teams that sit deep.
Walcott should play against pressing teams with high defensive line and Giroud against deep defending teams.
He's a real threat when we are a goal up and play the counter attacking style, but if we chase a game against a deeper sitting team we are in trouble with him.
We've seen enough of Giroud to know he's more effective as a sub, or against teams that sit deep.
Giroud is an excellent Plan B from the bench, a great presence in the box, perfect for team who defend deep against us.
Liverpool did so against us, the entire week the TV pundits were saying Liverpool press high and are susceptible to counter attacks from teams that sit deep.
A bit more aggression, speed, grit and determination in the last third is what AFC need to break down the teams that want to play deep against us.
We lacked options from the bench and against a deep lying team with lots of players behind the ball, our pace wasn't that effective and our intensity wasn't as good as it was against the Blues.
Stronger defensively wenger has tried to integrate the 4 -14-1 tactics in certain games this works well against those team who like to play with an ATt mid but it didn't offer much support to the wide men as there starting positions was very deep.
To think he brought in Walcott against a team that is sitting deep and defend is nothing but shocking.
Would you honestly play Cazorla in a deeper role against a team like Chelsea?
«We've had some practise [against teams who sit back at the Emirates] but we also don't forget the ingredients that are needed to play against a team who is very deep.
I can comprehend why some would want him sold, he does underperform a LOT but i can't help but think the team selection hinders him, having Ramsey who forgets to defend and bomb forward into his space doesn't help him, he was dropping deeper against pool and lost the ball a few times when he shouldn't have been that deep.
Pace won't do anything against teams that defend deep.
The 3 points is great for confidence but against better teams with one deep lying midfielder, (Arteta or Flamini) in front of Per we'll get found out.
Norway sat deep, and restricted England to just two shots on target, which is no where near enough against a team ranked outside the world's top fifty.
Last season, a 2 man deep two were not enough to stop counters against top teams, how effective will just one holding mid be?
He's a deep benchwarmer on Team USA, and when your benchwarmers are stars, they play against the non-star benchwarmers from other countries.
Belerin was played out of position by Wenger (surprise) against the best team in the Turkish league, kid was thrown in at the deep end.
Mata has been central to some of our best performances against teams that sit deep.
Lastly the counter attack, we play with wingbacks, whom whenever teams sit deep against us we send forward, so pretty much all the time.
Sit deep against top 4 and counter attack... play freely against bottom half teams... league is ours.
That result — against a team confident of being in the Premier League next season — provided the Gunners with a much - needed confidence boost, but it merely papered over the cracks, which are wide and deep.
Pls don't come here with excuses, we all saw you guys rejoice after we won against Bayern so I don't want to hear «its just preseason» excuse, Arsenal equally fixed in a strong squad, we had Sanchez, Koscielny, Bellerin & Mustafi out thus 4 of our starters & Chelsea had no Hazard & Matic thus two of their starters out, to me that's virtually equal team strength... We all can sit & delude ourselves but deep down we all know that one way or the other Arsenal with Arsene in charge will forever be a joke in the eyes of the elite European football
Cazorla is not the best defender and against tough teams he may struggle — he was clearly playing a deeper role — and vs. Chelsea he would thus be needed to sometimes defend with the DM and stand strong on the ball.
Against teams who defend deep you can either go around them or through them.
Selling out against the run — keeping as many players in the box as possible — leaves a team vulnerable to getting burned deep.
I completely agree that a tweak is needed against the big teams but i think we saw it in the city game when Wenger basically removed the 10 and had Wilshere playing deeper alongside Ramsey and Cazorla drifted inside and was essentially playing the false - 10.
otherwise teams just sit really deep when they defend against us.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z