Sentences with phrase «against former spouses»

3 Feb. 8, 2018)(unpublished) was a situation where the family law judge awarded $ 15,000 in Family Code section 271 sanctions against both former spouses but also denied ex-wife's request for $ 50,000 in «needs - based» fees under Family Code sections 2030/2032.

Oscar upshot: If the Academy wanted a ratings - grabber of a showdown, they got one what with the press bent on pitting Cameron's visually stunning Goliath of a blockbuster, «Avatar,» considered the highest - grossing movie of all time with nearly $ 3 billion worldwide, against former spouse Bigelow's modestly budgeted but more narrative - forward «The Hurt Locker.»

Some divorces end with antagonism, and if you need to protect yourself, it may be necessary for you to get a restraining order against your former spouse.

(f) On January 16, 2004, the Applicant misrepresented herself as a landlord in order to obtain, without consent or authorization, credit bureau information of her former spouse and his wife and used this information in her family law proceedings against her former spouse;

Sometimes you hear about Family litigants for whom their dispute against the former spouse has taken on a life of its own, and who will not stop until they have literally exhausted every possible legal and procedural avenue.

As detailed in reporting by Jezebel and Gawker, O'Reilly's efforts against his former spouse, Maureen McPhilmy, have targeted her new family, her membership in their local Catholic parish,...

Your children will play you against your former spouse.

You may be starting to feel that nothing can work against your former spouse's devotion to destroy your relationship with your children.

When the full - blown parental alienation dynamic exists the pathology is more intractable: It is a campaign of denigration against the former spouse who abandoned him / her.

Not exact matches

Eliot was listed as the plaintiff in the short - lived case against his spouse, which came on the heels of a scathing Post exclusive that revealed the ousted governor was canoodling with former Bill de Blasio spokesman Lis Smith.

That means, in just one year, more than 12 million women and men will experience «intimate partner violence» — which, according to the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence (NCADV) is any physical, sexual, or psychological harm by a current or former partner or spouse.

Imagine a mother who is fighting for custody and access rights, against a former abusive spouse who's depriving her right to see her children.

When someone dies and a spouse / former spouse or partner / former partner wishes to make a claim against the estate, two different situations can arise.

It was Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 that provided a mechanism for someone who has not remarried or entered into a civil partnership to bring a claim in England and Wales against a spouse or former spouse even if a court has already made a financial order in divorce proceedings in another jurisdiction.

On November 26, 2014 the Kentucky Court of Appeals issued an unpublished opinion related to the rights to a former spouse to collect against an insurance policy.

-- This crime involves any act or threat of violence against any person with whom the accused has or had an intimate relationship such as current or former spouses, parents, children, romantic partners, or anyone residing in the same household.

A client may also be concerned that a former spouse or civil partner, who has not formed a subsequent marriage or civil partnership, could have a claim against his estate after his death.

If your former spouse is a Facebook friend or if one of your Facebook friends is a friend of your former spouse then your former spouse will be able to review your Facebook account for evidence against you.

Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 provides a mechanism in certain circumstances for a claim to be brought in this country against a spouse or former spouse even if financial provision has already been made by a foreign court.

From time to time, former spouses remarry each other, even though statistics are against them (and second marriages in general).

Courts always encourage former spouses to agree on modification terms, rather than be pitted against each other, as this saves the cost of litigation and prevents the courts from having to make a decision for the spouses as to the modified terms, which neither spouse may like.

In Arizona, protective orders can be issued only against family members, including former spouses.

Sometimes the routines of the custodial parent bump against the expectations of the visiting parent, and this causes continuing friction between the two former spouses.

After all, it is during these time periods that emotions tend to run extremely high, and that can cause one or both of the parents to shirk their parental responsibilities in lieu of getting a so - called revenge against their former partner or spouse.