Campaigners are today taking their bid to overturn bans
against gay civil marriages and heterosexual civil partnerships to the European court of human rights (ECHR).
That's why he moved so many jobs overseas and he's
against gay civil rights, the very thing this country was founded on.
Not exact matches
Since the late 1950s, there has a been «a growing revulsion
against aggression on smaller scales,» empowered by movements for «
civil rights, women's rights, children's rights,
gay rights, and animal rights.»
Those opposed to
gay marriage say it goes
against what the Bible says about sexuality, and that same - sex couples already have equal rights via
civil partnerships.
Were religious people promoting peace when they voted down
gay marriage (a
civil rights issue, opponents of which will be viewed in the same light as the opponents
against civil rights in the 50s and 60s) You are just so comfortable in the majority, you can't see the prejudice and bias you put on people that aren't like you.
The political right is moving back toward individual economic rights, and the younger generations are moving toward individual
civil rights like being
against substance and
gay marriage laws.
I really struggle with concerns that participating in a church community that restricts the roles of women in leadership, or that actively campaigns
against the
civil rights of
gays and lesbians, makes me complicit in those activities.
You defenders of religion keep some interesting company: Osama Bin LLaden, Iraninan Mullahs, Saudi Wahabists (who will cut your head off in public if you preach anything but Islam), Joe Smith who preached that black people did not have souls (the church changed it mind after the
civil rights act and are now bigotted
against gay people), the Taliban, the pope and his child rapists, ignorant & stupid evangelicals who think that revelations is a roadmap to the future.
The
Civil Rights Agenda has released a statement saying that Chick - Fil - A has agreed to stop donating money to organizations that are
against gay marriage.
You may believe the Bible tells you
gays should be able to marry or maybe even that blacks should not be able to marry whites (another thing people have used the Bible to protest
against); however, that does not mean that US
civil equal rights laws should be based on your personal religious beliefs.
Unless your
gay then he's
against their
civil rights to marry and protect their families.
Bitter the once bitten case hardened uncivil debutants holding steadfast their now dying almost dead hands dealt
against the
gay player's unbeatable
civil hand.
Their goal is to use scientific studies to bolster arguments
against giving
gay and lesbian people political or
civil rights.
hingie, I really don't care what you think since my
civil marriage has nothing to do with your book of fairy tales and if the main reason you believe
gays should be discriminated
against is because you read it in your book of myths, then all the more reason to grant
gays their
civil marriages.
Wait a minute, since you and your bigoted friends aren't really talking about taking away citizenship from our
gay brothers and sisters (it would be a
civil war if you tried, I'm not
gay and I would fight
against you), how could you take away any of their «God» given rights as a citizen, you know the same «God» given rights that you and your patriotic friends enjoy (I am assuming that you and everyone else that feels like you have served our great country in uniform just like me and my
gay brothers and sister have done, are doing and will do).
MORMONS waged a political war
against the
gays in an attempt to deny
civil rights to 10 percent of the population — BIGOTRY, church orchestrated bigotry.
Already, the conscience division has drawn criticism from
civil groups concerned that the protections will be used as a license to discriminate, particularly
against gay or transgender patients, as well as from abortion rights groups.
This is about
gays getting their
civil right to marry and it has people talking because those that are voting
against it show how clueless they are about the facts on this subject.
In a case that could have wide - ranging national significance for
gay rights, a federal appeals court in New York ruled that a landmark
civil rights law bars employers from discriminating
against their workers based on sexual orientation.
A number of witnesses were to testify in favor of a marriage equality plank in the platform: Marc Solomon, national campaign director for Freedom to Marry; Allison Herwitt, legislative director for the Human Rights Campaign; Army Chief Warrant Officer Charlie Morgan, a lesbian New Hampshire guardsman with stage - four incurable breast cancer and a plaintiff in Servicemembers Legal Defense Network's lawsuit
against the Defense of Marriage Act; Michael Macleod - Ball, the American
Civil Liberties Union's chief of staff for the Washington Legislative Office; and Aaron Zellhoefer, a
gay delegate to the Democratic National Convention representing the National Stonewall Democrats.
Theresa May has previously voted
against reducing the age of consent for
gay people, the repeal of Section 28 and
civil partnership.
She was the first member of Congress to introduce
gay rights legislation, her approach being a full - scale incorporation of sexual orientation into the protections afforded by the 1964
Civil Rights Act
against discrimination based on race, religion, sex, and other categories.
The
gay marriage bill has been saved after Ed Miliband agreed at the last minute to vote
against an amendment to extend
civil partnerships to heterosexual couples that had prompted government warnings that it would derail the entire measure.
Against nostalgic accounts like Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States, most social - change movements are started and directed by the relatively affluent and well - educated, from the preacher - led
civil rights movement to modern feminism to
gay rights.
The conservatives (denialists) in a society see themselves as being near the top of the heap, mechanisms that bring about major social changes are likely to be bad for their position, in comparison the liberals (alarmists) see such mechanisms as an opportunity to bring about social change to their advantage, examples of how conservatives fight
against such changes can be seen all over the place, from giving women the vote, to
civil rights legislation, to
gay marriage, etc..
Thorne - Begland's opponents argued that they voted
against him not because he was
gay, but rather because his advocacy «amounted to military insubordination and a challenge to the state constitution, which bans
gay marriage and
civil unions,» the Post reports.
Filing
civil rights complaints leading to the Quebec Human Rights Tribunal's decision in 2008
against homophobic harassment, which awarded a West - Island
gay couple $ 15,000 in damages, and another decision from the Tribunal in 2010, granting the same couple $ 12,000 in damages in another case.