On this particular topic as long as people who vote their religious belief
against gay marriage then it benefits people who believe differently — for any reason to be involved in the discussions since it affects them directly or indirectly.
But if they do cast a vote
against gay marriage then yes, they are a bigot.
Not exact matches
So if you support
gay marriage,
then you must disagree with those states that discriminate
against it, right?
When it comes to
gay marriage, judges often label legal arguments
against it as «religious» — and
then summarily dismiss them because they are religious.
This is moving further away from the teaching of Jesus than widening
marriage to include
gay people and
then returning to traditional Christian teaching
against living together.
This so called Christian is the first to openly accept
gay marriage as a political stance, which if you want to not believe what the bible says about it
then fine, but this wasn't his stance when running in Chicago
against a conservative black candidate.
If they want to deny Chick - fil - A the right to make a statement
against gay marriage,
then they are opposing the law that gives
gays the right to speak FOR
gay marriage.
I do nt know whats worse the fact that a white man could be accused of the same thing this man is accused of and we as blacks would be screaming bloody murder or the fact that he marched
against gay marriages, and took personal shots at other pastor and
then he gets exposed 4 what he really is and that ironically is everything he preached and marched
against sad
hingie, I really don't care what you think since my civil
marriage has nothing to do with your book of fairy tales and if the main reason you believe
gays should be discriminated
against is because you read it in your book of myths,
then all the more reason to grant
gays their civil
marriages.
id rather you die of alcohol poisoning
then to give that money
against gay marriage or abortion.
If they're using funds to shelter pedophilic priests, and campaign
against abortion, and
gay marriage...
then it's time to tax them.
When I saw who had written that, my hopes for an intelligent, or at least receptive, government response to the campaign
against gay «
marriage»
then getting under way died within me: those words were written by Theresa May, the Home Secretary, and they appeared on the very morning she launched a «consultation» on the government's proposals to enforce a change in the legal definition of this ancient institution.
Addabbo has said he never discussed his personal beliefs or how he would vote on
gay marriage in the Senate during his campaign
against then Sen. Serphin Maltese (R - Glendale).
Since
then, Diaz has campaigned harder and longer than any other New York Democrat
against marriage equality, leading a crowd of thousands in protest
against gay marriage this summer.