COPOH believes that cases where malicious intention to discriminate
against handicapped people will be rare.
Not exact matches
What logical, caring
person can support slavery, discrimination
against women, discrimination
against gays, discrimination
against the
handicapped, beating children, beating elderly female slaves without punishment, supporting a god who would let the family of his greatest supporter be killed to WIN A BET, etc..?
What good are morals if the one giving them supports morals that most
people consider to be awful like slavery and discrimination
against women, gays and the
handicapped, as well as beating children and slaves without punishment in some cases?
You are the first
person I know who says slavery and mindless discriminations
against women, gays, and the
handicapped is PERFECT.
Where do the morals come from that tell you the Bible is WRONG to support the OWNING of other
people; discrimination
against women, discrimination
against the
handicapped, unpunished BEATING of slaves, children, etc..?
Most
people are opposed to his «righteous» support of slavery and discrimination
against women, gays, and the
handicapped.
Now, I'll admit that
people from disadvantaged backgrounds have the odds stacked
against them, as do individuals with abusive parents or mental and physical
handicaps.
Brokers participating in the VA home loan program must not discriminate
against a
person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex,
handicap, familial status or national origin by refusing to show or sell a property; by discriminating in the terms of the sale; or by representing that property as not available for inspection.
The Pennsylvania State University prohibits discrimination and harassment
against any
person because of age, ancestry, color, disability or
handicap, national origin, race, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, or veteran status.
The Association believes that
persons rarely discriminate
against mentally
handicapped people with malicious intent.
Pursuant to section 2 (a) of the Canadian Human Rights Act, S.C. 1976 - 77 c. 33 physically
handicapped people were protected
against discriminatory employment practices.
The Respondent's union asked the CSST to reconsider that decision, arguing the functional limitations resulting from the employment injury at issue made the Respondent a
person with a
handicap within the meaning of section 10 of the Québec Charter, he could not be discriminated
against because of this
handicap and that, in looking for suitable employment, the employer had to make every effort to facilitate his return to work without, however, imposing undue hardship on him.
The Court noted that this definition reflected Congress» concern with protecting the
handicapped against discrimination stemming not only from simple prejudice, but also from «archaic attitudes and laws» and from «the fact that the American
people are simply unfamiliar with and insensitive to the difficulties confronting individuals with
handicaps.
REALTORS ® shall not be parties to any plan or agreement to discriminate
against a
person or
persons on the basis of race, color, religion, sex,
handicap, familial status, national origin, or sexual orientation.
The district court noted that the FHA prohibits: (1) discrimination in the sale or rental of a dwelling; or (2) discrimination
against any
person in the terms, conditions, or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling — because of a
handicap of the buyer or renter, or a
person residing or intending to reside in that dwelling.
Prior to the enactment of the Fair Housing Act Amendments of 1988 adding
handicapped to the protected classes, the Supreme Court addressed the applicable standard of review for alleged Equal Protection clause violations
against mentally retarded
people in the case City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center.
Be sure to visit the Fair Housing Act lobby display to pledge your commitment to Article 10 of the Code of Ethics, which states REALTORS ® should not discriminate
against any
person based on race, color, religion, sex,
handicap, familial status, national origin, sexual orientation or gender identity.
The Government alleged that the Company's behavior violated a section of the Act which prohibits the denial to «any
person... access to... any other service... relating to the business of selling or renting dwellings, or to discriminate
against him in the terms or conditions of such access... on account of
handicap.»
The charge
against Perland Corp., which constructed the Property, its president, William Persico and Thomas Buchar, the architect, involved the ground - floor units and common areas, which were in violation of the Fair Housing Act (the «FHA») because they were not accessible to
handicapped people.
It is illegal to discriminate
against any
person because of race, color, religion, sex,
handicap, familial status or nation of origin.
It is illegal to discriminate
against any
person because of race, color, religion, gender,
handicap, familial status, or national origin.
(Amended 1/11) REALTORS ®, in their real estate employment practices, shall not discriminate
against any
person or
persons on the basis of race, color, religion, sex,
handicap, familial status, national origin, or sexual orientation.
It is illegal to discriminate
against any
person because of race, color, religion, sex,
handicap, familial status, or national origin.