This conclusion is further supported by... the witnesses» evidence, found, inter alia, that «One of the effects of criminal sanctions
against homosexual acts is to reinforce the misapprehension and general prejudice of the public and increase the anxiety and guilt feelings of homosexuals leading, on occasions, to depression and the serious consequences which can follow from that unfortunate disease.»
That additional data, derived from the twin sources of Revelation (Tradition and Scripture), is impressive and enriching, and fills in for Christians the full rationale for the teaching
against homosexual acts.
Please explain to my ignorant worldview how Romans 1:18 - 32 does not at least speak of homosexual activity as perversion and how 1 Corinthians 6 does not speak
against the homosexual act when the Greek Paul used clearly states in his sin list both partners in the homosexual act.
Not exact matches
Homosexual acts by their nature arbitrate
against the procreative dimension, as discussed in the previous section about the sacred interplay.
That phrase is not used here in the law about male
homosexual acts It is not one of the laws
against things that are identified as a toebah to God!»
«In those times, we knew about things that have become common today: the reality of abortion, of people who manifest
homosexual tendencies, whose personal dignity we always respected, but we were formed to see these
acts as absolutely unacceptable,
against the nature that God had created for us.»
I can not agree with the last paragraph unless it can be established that those
against the rights of
homosexuals are
acting out of a personal arrogance.
On Christian ethical grounds, I would recommend that all laws making criminal offenses of
acts between consenting
homosexual adults be repealed and that there be no blanket job discrimination
against homosexual persons of either sex; further, I contend that exclusion of
homosexual persons from churches (unless they are pushed out for a reason that would apply to heterosexuals in identical fashion) is untenable.
My argument
against ENDA is not based in a moral judgment about
homosexual acts, but in the fact that our times are not those times.
The three boys, were suspended after a disciplinary committee established they were
homosexuals, following a «caught - in - the -
act» report made
against them by their colleagues.
The Flagbearer of the People's National Convention (PNC), Dr. Edward Mahama, has said although he loves
homosexuals and will not discriminate
against them as a Christian, as a medical practitioner, he considers their
act unhealthy.
This is a term that was invented to describe people with a pathological fear of
homosexuals — the kind of people who engage in
acts of violence
against gays.
He said each agency must
act in the interests of the individual child, but stressed: «If we take the view as a society that we should not discriminate
against people who are
homosexual, you can not give exclusions for people on the grounds that their religion or their race says we don't agree with that.»
(3) Do the criminalisation of
homosexual activities and the threat of imprisonment in relation thereto, as set out in the Offences
against the Person
Act 1861 of Sierra Leone (Case C - 199 / 12), the Penal Code Act 1950 of Uganda (Case C - 200 / 12) or the Senegalese Penal Code (Case C - 201 / 12) constitute an act of persecution within the meaning of Article 9 (1)(a), read in conjunction with Article 9 (2)(c) of the Directi
Act 1861 of Sierra Leone (Case C - 199 / 12), the Penal Code
Act 1950 of Uganda (Case C - 200 / 12) or the Senegalese Penal Code (Case C - 201 / 12) constitute an act of persecution within the meaning of Article 9 (1)(a), read in conjunction with Article 9 (2)(c) of the Directi
Act 1950 of Uganda (Case C - 200 / 12) or the Senegalese Penal Code (Case C - 201 / 12) constitute an
act of persecution within the meaning of Article 9 (1)(a), read in conjunction with Article 9 (2)(c) of the Directi
act of persecution within the meaning of Article 9 (1)(a), read in conjunction with Article 9 (2)(c) of the Directive?