There are so many modern discoveries, research and data that are standardly «denied» if it doesn't fit the «old school» ways, ideals or chriteria, which in itself, is a crime against science, and moreover,
against humanity as a whole (the general population), don't you think?
Not exact matches
It was Sheikh Ali who defended us
against his friend, arguing that if we had saved just one life,
as the Quran said, it was
as if we had saved the
whole of
humanity.
For «we», I take it
as obvious that there is a collective right of
humanity to prevent major consequential damage to the
whole world that must be weighed in
against individual rights to acquire and use natural resources.
Gore is of course saying he wouldn't directly term the
whole situation
as a crime
against humanity.
The movement to make ecocide a crime
against peace under international law, led by UK - based lawyer Polly Higgins,
as well
as efforts to grant legal rights to Mother Earth, such
as Bolivia has done, is exactly where we need to be going in terms of the highest level of environmental thinking: Recognizing that destroying
whole swaths of the planet, with little to no concern for the effect on all the creatures that live upon it, is not just unethical, unacceptable behavior, but is also a crime, a crime
against humanity, a crime
against life itself.