These can be weapons of terror, weapons that despots and terrorists use
against innocent populations, and weapons hacked to behave in undesirable ways.»
Despots and terrorists could use
them against innocent populations, removing any ethical restraints.
These groups believe that the technology will create «weapons of terror, weapons that despots and terrorists use
against innocent populations, and weapons hacked to behave in undesirable ways.»
Not exact matches
And we are all frightened at the prospect of the use of nuclear weapons by terrorists
against innocent civilian
populations.
My climate enemies have done scientific and other academic frauds; they've destroyed, withheld and pretended to misplace scientific data in order to prevent the human race discovering things about nature; they've forged documents to frame people they don't like; mendaciously and publicly accused
innocent people of deplorable crimes that carry prison sentences; betrayed the trust reposed in their professions by fraudulently abrogating to themselves the magical competence to diagnose entire swathes of the (perfectly healthy)
population with thought disorders just to score points in an academic bitch fight; deliberately and self - servingly lied to * massive * audiences about the way science itself works — than which I can't for the life of me think of a greater crime
against humanity in the recent history of the developed world, can you Joe?
The Charkaoui case has been yet another one pointed to by critics of the shoddy research and baseless allegations used
against vulnerable
populations, who repeatedly are determined
innocent by the courts.