Sentences with phrase «against insurers who»

Uninsured and underinsured motorist accident attorney J. Todd Tenge, serving Boulder, Denver, and Fort Collins, will fight against insurers who unfairly reject, ignore, delay, or undervalue claims from policyholders who have been injured by motorists with little or no insurance.
The «D»: Chris was instructed by the owners of this yacht in relation to claims against the insurers who had declined to pay sums claimed when the yacht became a constructive total loss after she grounded.
[6] Waldock v State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (2014), FSCO 4315 upheld on appeal FSCO 4315 — A special award of $ 108,456.09 was awarded against an insurer who blindly relied on flawed medical reports.
Parties seeking a cost award against an insurer who allegedly failed to comply with its obligations will need to bring evidence to support their claim.

Not exact matches

Bonomo, who was a star government witness against corrupt former Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos, was largely sidelined as CEO of Physicians» Reciprocal Insurers, the state's second - largest malpractice insurer, according to a January report by the Albany Times Union.
Last June, Faso voted in favor of the cynically dubbed Protecting Access to Care Act of 2017, a bill that sides with insurers, against the rights of patients who have been injured by medical malpractice.
Then there was a CEO who suggested that many specialty casualty insurers he competed against had underinvested in claims control.
But look at the evidence of those closest to bearing the real costs: private US insurers — those who place real bets indemnifying against property loss — unlike the supposedly more serious scientists — are unmoved by ACW: «The American Insurance Association, which represents 400 property and casualty insurers, says the debate about global warming has not been resolved.
Ensuring people have someone representing them who helps bus accident victims and families on a daily basis, including defending their rights against transportation companies and their insurers.
Often, insurers, who have a vested interest in paying out as little as they possibly can, use these false perceptions against bikers, arguing that they're justification for giving accident victims little compensation.
No firms gain more by dragging out litigation than the big firms because they have the clients with the tens and hundreds of millions of dollars of capitalization who can afford, with the help of the taxpayer, to pay the astronomical fees they charge for as long as it takes to take on similar corporations similarly represented, or to squash the little guy (which is why FCT has McCarthy's on retainer and Stewart has Borden's on retainer — the given real estate file / title insurance claim is small potatoes but the title insurers make it dead obvious that if you sue them, you will up against a Big Firm.
Only lawyer in Canada who has won, on three separate occasions, punitive damage awards against insurance companies for the manner in which the insurers treated their policy holders
They are typically hired by insurer to represent a company or person who has been taken legal action against on a claim covered by an insurance coverage.
Other key figures include Andrew Marsh, who has an extensive track record acting for employers, contractors and their insurers in the construction and engineering sectors; and Suzanne Wharton, who splits her time between Leeds and Manchester and focuses on high - value claims against solicitors and financial services professionals.
When a party is injured in an accident, usually there is an insurer who will provide a defense to the claim and ultimately will provide the funds to pay a judgment or settlement against the party who is responsible for the accident and for the injuries sustained by the claimant.
We have represented numerous clients against long - term disability insurers who have not lived up to their obligations and paying when needed.
(4) Starlight Shipping Co v Allianz Marine & Ors; Brit UW Ltd & Ors v Starlight & Ors; Brit UW & Ors v Imperial Marine & Ors [2014] EWHC 3068 (Comm); [2015] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 747; [2014] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 579; [2014] 2 C.L.C. 503; [2015] Lloyd's Rep. I.R. 54 — relief granted to both insurers and employees and agents of the insurers who were intended to benefit from the settlement of the insurance claim - relief by way of specific performance and injunctions was tailored to the particular circumstances which included the prohibition on anti-suit injunction to restrain the Greek proceedings — assured ordered to execute documents recording the meaning and effect of the settlement agreement (including settlement of claims against the servants and agents who were third parties to the original settlement) so that the same could be placed before the foreign court to assist in the recognition and enforcement of the English judgment in Greece under the Judgments Regulation.
Harbour can give unique access to an A-rated panel of insurers who will protect against this eventuality by providing a bespoke insurance policy that pays out should adverse costs be awarded.
His other significant success in the area of insurance bad faith include a verdict in Kieffer v. Unum Group in the amount of $ 4.3 million, including $ 3 million in punitive damages; and settlements of $ 6.75 million, $ 3 million and $ 2.9 million against various insurers who acted in bad faith.
Several insurers are planning to take group legal action against an individual who filed 50 motor insurance claims in 18 months.
Your sole claim Expect to see language to the effect that this is your sole claim against the person who was responsible for your injuries and his or her insurer.
Expect to see language to the effect that this is your sole claim against the person who was responsible for your injuries and his or her insurer.
Against the background facts of a clear failure to give timely notice, this decision casts doubt on the approach of those insurers who, since Delaware Mansions, have been denying all liability on the basis of lack of notification.
The estate of the man who was killed in the fatal motorcycle accident argued through their Rhode Island personal injury attorneys that the «owned but not insured exclusion within the NLC policy was unclear and ambiguous and thus should be construed against the insurer to permit UM coverage.»
California insurers providing this coverage help those who live in rentals to insure their personal property against losses from a number of different causes and also protect themselves against the threat of liability judgments inside and outside of the rental dwelling.
CURE is the voice for responsible drivers who have been discriminated against by other auto insurers based on factors that shouldn't impact auto insurance rates, such as education, occupation, and home ownership.
* Protect yours (and thereby, the insurer's) legal rights against any Third Parties who may have been responsible for the loss.
It is generally triggered when a final judgement is entered against the insured, and it is satisfied when the insurer pays such covered amounts to the plaintiff who obtained the judgement.
In these difficult cases, it is critical to hire an experienced disability attorney who can guide you through the appeals process and, if necessary, file a lawsuit against your insurer.
The purpose of the contestability period is to give insurers the ability to protect themselves against clients who are looking for a cheaper policy because they know they have a life - threatening illness and are likely to be denied if they're honest.
Under this coverage, your insurer provides you and all relatives who reside in your household with protection against economic losses arising from injuries sustained in motor vehicle accidents anywhere within the United States, its territories and possessions, or Canada.
In case of critical illness insurance policy, the insured person at his own expense must permit the insurers to perform or do any act of enforcing or securing the criminal rights or remedies against the third party who has caused the loss or injury.
If you know who damaged your parked vehicle, you can file a Property Damage claim against their insurer.
(b) Reductions in premiums shall be available if all named drivers who are 25 years of age or older: (1) Have committed no traffic offenses for the prior three years or since the date of licensure, whichever is shorter; (2) Have had no claims based on fault against an insurer for the prior three years; and (3) Complete one of the following types of driving courses: (A) A course in defensive driving of not less than six hours from a driver improvement clinic or commercial or noncommercial driving school approved by and under the jurisdiction of the Department of Driver Services; (B) An emergency vehicles operations course at the Georgia Public Safety Training Center; (C) A course in defensive driving of not less than six hours from a driver improvement program which is administered by a nonprofit organization such as the American Association of Retired People, the American Automobile Association, the National Safety Council, or a comparable organization and which meets the standards promulgated by the Department of Driver Services pursuant to subsection (f) of this Code section; or (D) A course in defensive driving of not less than six hours offered by an employer to its employees and their immediate families, which course has been approved by the Department of Driver Services.
(c) Reductions in premiums shall be available if all named drivers who are under 25 years of age: (1) Have committed no traffic offenses for the prior three years or since the date of licensure, whichever is shorter; (2) Have had no claims based on fault against an insurer for the prior three years; and (3) Complete a preparatory course offered to new drivers of not less than 30 hours of classroom training and not less than six hours of practical training by a driver's training school approved by and under the jurisdiction of the Department of Driver Services or by an accredited secondary school, junior college, or college.
High - ratio Mortgage - A mortgage that exceeds 75 percent of the loan - to - value ratio; must be insured by either the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) or a private insurer to protect the lender against default by the borrower who has less equity invested in the property.
Before the crisis, mortgage insurers competed against second mortgage lenders for the business of borrowers who could not put 20 percent down.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z