People are
against kill shelters and what they do.
An additional 21 cats and 25 dogs were transferred to another agency (likely a kill shelter since PETA has a «policy
against No Kill shelters.»)
Not exact matches
According to the National Coalition
Against Domestic Violence, 71 percent of pet - owning women entering
shelters reported that their batterer had injured, maimed,
killed or threatened family pets for revenge or to psychologically control victims.
According to the National Coalition
Against Domestic Violence, 71 % of pet owners entering domestic violence
shelters report that their batterer had threatened, injured or
killed family pets.
Killing for remodels, killing for convenience, killing because someone had a bias against the animal for one reason or another... our KC shelters are euthanizing more than the average no kill and yet saying that none of them were ado
Killing for remodels,
killing for convenience, killing because someone had a bias against the animal for one reason or another... our KC shelters are euthanizing more than the average no kill and yet saying that none of them were ado
killing for convenience,
killing because someone had a bias against the animal for one reason or another... our KC shelters are euthanizing more than the average no kill and yet saying that none of them were ado
killing because someone had a bias
against the animal for one reason or another... our KC
shelters are euthanizing more than the average no
kill and yet saying that none of them were adoptable.
While it is true that euthanasia is a fact of animal pound and
shelter operations in Victoria, the question this audit is answering is not whether euthanasia is ever appropriate, but whether the LDH
kill rate is higher than acceptable, measured
against similar organisations.
Sounds to me like more bs «scientific research» in order to provide an excuse for more official discrimination
against cats (not allowing cats in plane cabins, apartments...
kill policies for cats in
shelters and feral cats, etc...).
So, in other words, Toledo was providing an incentive to Lucas County's dog wardens to pick up «pit bulls» and
kill them in the
shelter (the
shelter has a well - known policy
against adopting out «pit bull type» dogs).
By far the biggest criticism
against the no -
kill shelter movement is that the term is misleading on its face because it encourages the public to believe that the goal is to
kill no
shelter animals.
Criticisms leveled
against no -
kill shelters include assertions that no -
kill means only that some other
shelter will do the
killing.
Will she speak out in favor of legislation requiring
shelter directors to stop
killing cats in the same way she once publicly spoke out
against those very laws?
The problem with trying to standardize
shelter killing against population for New York City is that, as a big city, it has lots of small apartments and a very high cost of living.
While she gets some things wrong (starting with the title that these approaches are «new» rather than something she ignored and fought
against for well over a decade), the video was a breath of fresh air and an important contribution to the movement because of who she was and is, a key barometer of things to come, and one more nail in the coffin of the «catch and
kill» paradigm of animal
sheltering she used to epitomize.
Will she support the efforts of local No
Kill activists who are trying to reform their
shelters by publicly speaking out
against uncaring
shelter directors as she once so vocally spoke out in their defense, crisscrossing the nation to derail the brave and tenacious efforts of No
Kill advocates?
Because back then, even though I knew — in fact had experienced firsthand — the vitriol
against the No
Kill movement by HSUS, the ASPCA and other large, national organizations, I believed that at the very least, these organizations were regulating our
shelters by promoting and ensuring basic standards of care, as they have claimed, and still claim, they do.
Yesterday, I posted about a court case
against the Louisiana SPCA filed by a Bulldog Rescue group for the
shelter's refusal to provide information on the dogs they
killed.
To achieve this goal, we are partnering with animal lovers across the country to help ensure the passage of these laws
against powerful,
kill shelter lobbying organizations such as HSUS, the ASPCA and PETA, and we have put together the tools to help others do precisely that.
Moreover, for speaking the truth about neglect, abuse and needless
killing in
shelters and for PETA's systematic slaughter of thousands of animals every year, the same people who have made these allegations have called me a «piece of shit,» threatened violence
against me (one of them wrote an article called «Nathan Winograd Should be Beheaded) and threatened to
kill my dog.
We don't discriminate
against so called «
kill -
shelters» either so send us those shirts as well.
If I were to boil down my most important take away from of Redemption, it would be that instead of laying blame and setting up a punitive system (which doesn't work)
against the public as a primary strategy for opting out of lifesaving in favor of
killing,
shelters have a responsibility to do right by the animals they take in as their first priority.
The statistics are grim: Seventy - one percent of pet - owning women who go to abuse
shelters reported that their abuser had injured, maimed, threatened or
killed pets, according to the National Coalition
Against Domestic Violence.