Sentences with phrase «against lender liability»

Chapter 11 litigation, including defending against lender liability actions, fraudulent conveyance claims and challenges to acquisitions

She is also experienced in handling real property and UCC foreclosures, defending clients against lender liability, sham guaranty, and unfair business practices and specializes in enforcing and collecting judgments at both the trial court and appellate court level.

Not exact matches

Contracts with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac protect a lender against liability for underwriting mistakes made by the lender of the original mortgage if the software said YES.

Without admitting fault or liability, 32 lenders agreed to settle allegations against them, including CitiMortgage (which paid a fine of $ 700,000), Equitable Trust Mortgage Corporation, Baltimore, MD ($ 277,500), Financial Mortgage USA, Inc..

You agree to indemnify VA Loan Captain and its participating lenders from and against any and all liabilities, expenses (including attorneys» fees) and damages arising out of claims resulting from your use of this website, including any claims alleging facts that if accurate would equal a breach by you of this Terms of Use Agreement.

To the extent that you provide personal guarantees or security, your protection from liability as against the lender will be lost.

Thompson Hine's Business Restructuring, Creditors» Rights & Bankruptcy practice group, Commercial & Public Finance practice group, and Real Estate practice group are equipped to assist lenders in structuring financing transactions to enhance protections against preference and fraudulent transfer liabilities that may arise after a borrower goes into distress.

Mar. 13, 2018)(published), a trial judge sanctioned plaintiffs who brought lender liability claims in a residential property dispute with terminating sanctions and also imposed over $ 25,000 in monetary sanctions (as against plaintiffs and their attorneys) under Code of Civil Procedure section 128.7.

His reported cases include RH Green & Silley Weir v BR (limitation period against 3rd party), de Bry v Fitzgerald (security for costs), Hartt v Newspaper Publishing (libel concerning a work by Michelangelo), Pearson v Sanders Witherspoon (valuation of loss of chance), Siebe Gorman v Pneupac (status of consent orders), Senate Electrical v NTL (liability of an employee for acquisition warranties) and Bendell v Smith & Others (a successful recovery action by a lender on a shared appreciation mortgage equity release — the only such case to go to trial).

Borrower and the Principal (s) must, jointly and severally, absolutely and unconditionally covenant and agree to pay, indemnify and hold Lender harmless against any and all damage, loss, liability, costs and expenses which Lender may suffer or to which Lender may become subject, plus interest thereon at the After - Maturity Rate, which arise out of or are based upon:

It is really a business decision for the lender to determine whether it would receive more money by accepting the Farmington Short Sale, or completing a foreclosure, reselling the property, and pursuing personal liability (i.e., deficiency judgment against the borrower and / or claims against guarantors, for loans on which those remedies are available.)

It is really a business decision for the lender to determine whether it would receive more money by accepting the St Paul Central Short Sale, or completing a foreclosure, reselling the property, and pursuing personal liability (i.e., deficiency judgment against the borrower and / or claims against guarantors, for loans on which those remedies are available.)

It is really a business decision for the lender to determine whether it would receive more money by accepting the Minnesota Short Sale, or completing a foreclosure, reselling the property, and pursuing personal liability (i.e., deficiency judgment against the borrower and / or claims against guarantors, for loans on which those remedies are available.)

It is really a business decision for the lender to determine whether it would receive more money by accepting the St Louis Park Short Sale, or completing a foreclosure, reselling the property, and pursuing personal liability (i.e., deficiency judgment against the borrower and / or claims against guarantors, for loans on which those remedies are available.)

It is really a business decision for the lender to determine whether it would receive more money by accepting the St Paul Daytons Bluff Short Sale, or completing a foreclosure, reselling the property, and pursuing personal liability (i.e., deficiency judgment against the borrower and / or claims against guarantors, for loans on which those remedies are available.)