None of this changed Paul for or
against loving God, but did put more weight on the «love God» side.
Not exact matches
Now I am not
against teaching about giving, but I believe it is a gift from
God to us to be able to give, and I believe if the
love for
God and the
love for people are taught, giving will happen — giving for the right purposes.
But you can't
love God while you're sinning
against Him.
Judas was not to become a martyr because of the way the apostles wrote about him in the Gospel - they saw through the eyes of men, and Judas was unable to redeem himself before he died a natural death, dying instead loathed, hated & driven to suicide for his deed
against the Son of
God, Jesus, whom he had
Loved so much.
You can
love God while sinning
against Him, isn't that the point of Confession and penance??
Jesus came to bring
Love to mankind.A mankind who desire to sin
against God.
Look, if
god / jesus is all -
loving, he won't hold it
against me for using the brain he gave me to think.
The problem with Observer's comment is that if
God suddenly appeared before Atheists it would go
against His nature of
love.
You are making statements
against one that we
love even though you do not know
God.
It's the twelve tribes
against the world, find your tribe in Revelation 7 of the 144,000 and the new Jerusalem is in Revelation 21:12
God is
love, do you
love grace and truth.
On one hand
God is a behemoth of dirty done deeds
against much of humanism's dispositions while on the other hand
God shows little to practically no
love to all our civilizations» ongoing trials of which we steadily reshape as the needs arise.
So why has not every christian that says they believe in
god,
love and Jesus been marching in the streets every day for the last 10 + years
against the 2 wars we've been fighting in?
This paraphrase is, I know, a parody that is both unfair and unnuanced, but it serves well enough to make the point that to espouse as one's purpose the promotion of the knowledge and
love of
God is, in our time, an act that runs
against both theological fashion and the spirit of the age.
So why has not every
god dam christian that says they believe in
god,
love and Jesus been marching in the streets every day for the last 10 + years
against the 2 wars we've been fighting in?
If I thought it was
God who killed my father when I was twelve, and some of my best friends before I was 20, if it was
God who had people kidnap me, slander me, threaten to kill me, and turn
loved ones
against me, then I would have a hard time trusting
God, if He was like that.
Unfortunately, this is the kind of thing Satan
loves, obviously from Martin's comments because it gives haters and ignorant people ammunition to argue
against God and church.
But my puerile conclusion from all this was that if
God was so great, so
loving and wonderful, then
God wouldn't hold it
against anyone who didn't know if they believed in
God — and so what difference did it make?
And it is because Jesus
loves the man with the withered hand, and because he
loves God and his kingdom, that Jesus is angry at those who would obstruct compassion and plot
against his life.
The
love poetry of this period of Indian literature is characterized by a deep longing for communion with
God.13 The other side of the reaction
against the rise of Shankara's Advaita Vedantic thought was a more philosophic one.
While it took me some time to work through the theology around it, once I accepted it as
loving there was no further doubt in my mind that I could never go back to believing that
God was
against that
love.
I don't know how to raise them in the faith in any other way than this:
God is good,
God is
Love,
God is for you, never
against you, and when you want to dance, darling, wave your flag and spin, let the wind of the Spirit move through you.
Rather than ignore them completely, we must acknowledge their presence but at the same time acknowledge that they have already been defeated and pray in the Spirit
against their schemes
against us, our friends, our church and this world and most importantly to
love everyone like
God does, especially if we think they are either demonically oppressed or possessed.
Can anything hold up
against the fury of a
God who wants you free, wants you restored, wants you to see that you are
loved loved loved.
Once I accepted it as genuine
love, I had no choice but to accept that
God, who is
love, would not be
against me expressing that
love and would in fact help me to walk in that
love.
An example of
God's
love is like a child who rebels
against his parent, gets into trouble, the parent again shows
love for the child, the child then realizes how much the parent
loves him / her and then tries to be a better person.
It goes
against my pride and my preconceived ideas of how
God should act and carry out both
love and justice.
«But if anyone has the world's goods and sees his brother in need, yet closes his heart
against him, how does
God's
love abide in him?»
In this kind of theodicy Gethesemane, the cross, and the resurrection are important foci for understanding the depths of
God's
love, who, in creating an unimaginatively complex matrix of matter eventuating finally in persons able to choose to go
against God's intentions, nonetheless grieves for and suffers with this beloved creation, both in the pain its natural course brings all its creatures and in the evil that its human creatures inflict upon it.
Shouldn't the sin of rebellion
against God be repaid with a deprivation of
God's Law, the greatest expression of His own particular
love for the Jews?
And John, the beloved disciple wrote, «If anyone has the world's goods and sees his brother in need, yet closes his heart
against him, how does
God's
love abide in him?
Jesus defended his actions
against his critics by stressing that
God's forgiving
love was available to all and that the angels of heaven rejoiced whenever a sinner repented.
So it is the persistent refusal to repent, and accept
God's grace and
love that keeps hell going, not His determination to keep sinners there
against their will.
Furthermore, Wesley argued (
against Reformed doctrine) that Christians could enjoy entire sanctification in this life:
loving God and their neighbors, meekness and lowliness of heart, abstaining from all appearance of evil, and doing all for the glory of
God.
It seems that we are so used to writing
against things that we can not articulate well to the culture what
God loves and what He has lovingly designed for our good!
In great areas of human action man's refusal to accept his finiteness makes him proud, self - righteous, and in rebellion
against God; man's selfishness makes him refuse to use his freedom with
love toward his fellow men.
In the treatment of the relation between justice and
love, in which «
God turns
against himself,» there is something of the «paradoxical» way in which
God exercises his sovereignty.
«Insofar as
God is a lover, He must also be a sufferer when His
love comes up
against the No of sin.»
Hate is then noticed in Cain
against his brother because his brother Able
loved God.
But they do not follow by a special act of divine wrath or retribution; they follow by the reaction of
God's
loving power
against that which violates
love.
Being egalitarian doesn't mean being
against traditional gender roles; it means being for the many roles through which women can bring glory to
God and
love to their neighbors.
Measure the decision to not support World Vision
against this teaching of Christ himself and tell me if it's hypocritical or not ««
Love the Lord your
God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.»
«Sin» is doing anything
against the will of
God, I.e., if you believe
God isn't down with the man
love, it's a sin.
I'm guessing, as Willow implies, that you are subconsciously rebelling
against an image of a threatening, fearsome, judgmental, vindictive and hurtful
god, a false god; because you know somewhere deep inside that God is nothing but Love, and that you were created and born from that Love; no matter how painful the personal world may have been, may still be, into which you were bo
god, a false
god; because you know somewhere deep inside that God is nothing but Love, and that you were created and born from that Love; no matter how painful the personal world may have been, may still be, into which you were bo
god; because you know somewhere deep inside that
God is nothing but Love, and that you were created and born from that Love; no matter how painful the personal world may have been, may still be, into which you were bo
God is nothing but
Love, and that you were created and born from that
Love; no matter how painful the personal world may have been, may still be, into which you were born.
For otherwise the Church would have acted
against its duty and capacity in a way and to an extent which the theologian can not ascribe to a Church which as a whole is indefectible in the
love of
God and not only in its truth.
Also He.ll really makes no sense when you think about it theologically, it directly goes
against the whole «
loving god» bit that believers are quick to say.
The theology was not simply off, but set
against God's nature, name, and essence being
love.
If we are full of holy impatience, living in faith, hope and
love of
God and men, if we always hope
against hope, then the Church, too, will become what she ought to be.
But if
God truly does have a violent and bloody side then Jesus was being deceptive, for nowhere in His life or ministry did He reveal
God as someone who goes to war
against His enemies or commands the genocide of people who do not
love or obey Him.
The realization that
God loves Hitler as much as S / He
loves Mother Teresa goes
against the grain.
But it does, by the grace of
God, manage to discover enough glimmers of meaning to continue to labor joyously despite great trials, hoping
against hope, looking for significant ways to let the «least of these» know how much
God loves them.