I've been
against marriage because I had the idea that my parents are suffering so much in it and I hated the idea of being so miserable.
Not exact matches
Because he is unabashedly pro-life and
against marriage redef!
Just
because the author quotes the Bible doesn't mean he's pro-life or
against gay
marriage.
When it comes to gay
marriage, judges often label legal arguments
against it as «religious» — and then summarily dismiss them
because they are religious.
The sky is not falling
because other people live their lives differently from you and have joined their lives in
marriage... Spend your time, energy and emotions on a topic that really matters - like world hunger, the pursuit of justice in the world, violence
against women, natural disaster relief - these are issues that need your attention..
Nii Equally valid is making sure that you aren't opposing gay
marriage because you hate, or are otherwise prejudiced
against gays, right?
Please don't say pro-life or anti gay
marriage because there are athiest groups
against these things too.
Arguments
against gay
marriage are theologically fraught, and Christians and Jews who try to mount biblically or theologically based arguments will find themselves ignored or denounced by secular gatekeepers precisely
because they offer biblically and theologically based arguments.
There are no newer studies to confirm gay
marriage because the agenda makes it a nightmare for anyone that goes
against their position.
In those cases the court deferred to the judgment of the Air Force that the free - exercise claim of a Jewish officer who wore his yarmulke on duty could not be accommodated; it deferred to the judgment of correctional authorities that the free - exercise claim of a Black Muslim to attend Friday afternoon religious services could not be accommodated; it deferred to the judgment of the Department of Agriculture's Forest Service that building a logging road through a national forest was necessary despite the damage to religious practices of Native American tribes in that area; it deferred to the Internal Revenue Service's ruling that Bob Jones University was not entitled to tax exemption
because of its religiously motivated rule
against interracial dating and
marriage on campus; it deferred to the judgment of the secretary of labor that a religious community must pay its members the minimum wage for work they performed in the group's business although the members said they had religious objections to being paid for their work.
If you were being told that legally you had to perform same sex
marriages I would fight with you
because it goes
against your beliefs.
If a Muslim religious leader or business leader spoke out
against gay
marriage, based on the teachings of the Koran, they wouldn't say a word, but
because the CEO of Chick - Fil - A and Billy Graham are Christians and base their beliefs on the teachings of the New Testament they are unfairly accused of hate speech.
No one wanted interracial
marriage because it was
against God and the bible.
Dowd's argument
against the teleology of
marriage is equivalent to someone arguing that, «well, my car won't start» either
because it broke down, or, heck, maybe
because I yanked the spark plugs» so cars must not be for traveling.»
But mostly, I caution
against it
because you will be denying yourself the possibility of knowing the kind of all - out, no - holds - barred love I believe that God wants us to experience in
marriage.
The parables disclose with what pleasure and tolerance he surveyed the broad scene of human activity: the merchant seeking pearls; the farmer sowing his fields; the real - estate man trying to buy a piece of land in which he had secret reason to believe a treasure lay buried; the dishonest secretary, who had been given notice, making friends
against the evil day among his employer's debtors by reducing their obligations; the five young women sleeping with lamps burning while the bridegroom tarried and unable to attend the
marriage because their sisters who had had foresight enough to bring additional oil refused to lend them any; the rich man whose guests for dinner all made excuses; the man comfortably in bed with his children who gets up at midnight to help his importunate neighbor only
because he despairs of getting rid of him otherwise; the king who is out to capture a city; the man who built his house upon the sand and lost it in the first storm of wind and rain; the queer employer who pays all of his men the same wage whether they have worked the whole day or a single hour; the great lord who going to a distant land entrusts his property to his three servants and judges them by the success of their investments when he returns; the shepherd whose sheep falls into a ditch; the woman with ten pieces of silver who, losing one, lights the candle and sweeps diligently till she finds it, and makes the finding of it the occasion of a celebration in which all of her neighbors are invited to share — and how long such a list might be!
I am
against calling their relationship a
marriage, or so I thought
because why not call it a civil union for legality purposes, as the argument for it goes?
The Church can not sanction any act of sex outside of true, ie male / female,
marriage,
because it directly goes
against the Church's primary vocation as the Bride of Christ, i.e. that Body of believers who spend their lives seeking «him whom my soul loves» (Sg 3:3) and making him the first priority of their lives.
It can be seen that the reason that churches are
against homosexual
marriage is not
because it is explicitly said by God, but
because of a lack of instruction to specifically allow it.
hingie, I really don't care what you think since my civil
marriage has nothing to do with your book of fairy tales and if the main reason you believe gays should be discriminated
against is
because you read it in your book of myths, then all the more reason to grant gays their civil
marriages.
It can be seen that the reason that churches are
against hom ose xual
marriage is not
because it is explicitly said by God, but
because of a lack of instruction to specifically allow it.
In my opinion, Christians vote
against gay
marriage simply
because they believe they shouldn't support something God says «no» to.
They and their allies and supporters (such as the 300 + self - identified LGBT and allied scholars, lawyers, journalists, and activists who published the manifesto «Beyond Same - Sex
Marriage» — a group that includes respected mainstream figures such as Gloria Steinem, Barbara Ehrenreich, and Kenji Yoshino) would, I have no doubt, sharply react
against the claim that polyamory «is attractive
because monogamy is hard.»
But even if I didn't, even if I believed same - sex
marriage was a sin, I could never, in good conscience, throw my support behind a law that would put my gay and lesbian neighbors behind bars for being gay or allow businesses free range to discriminate
against them
because of their orientation.
The Roman Catholic Church condemns it
because it holds that procreation is the only legitimate purpose of sexual intercourse, and continence within
marriage the only legitimate mode of family limitation.11 Most Roman Catholics and some Protestants, though probably a decreasing number, hold that family limitation by an artificial means is «
against nature,» and hence
against the divine will.
Have you ever voted
against gay rights or gay
marriage because of your faith?
But then the church, which was originally vehemently
against marriage, got involved — mostly
because they realized they couldn't stop it — and marrying «until death» was thrust into our wedding vows, starting in the mid-1500s.
With the exception of the first model (which is not a legal option
because it's
against public policy to plan the demise of a
marriage), all of these options are being practiced in one way or another with people throughout the Western world (even in the U.S!).
Rebel, rebel I disagreed with him [Cameron] about House of Lords reform, I disagreed with him about gay
marriage... I voted
against gay
marriage because a huge number of my constituents were very, very worked up about it and I just saw no need to upset them in that way.
Loughton is an unlikely political partner of Tatchell
because he voted
against the second reading of the equal
marriage bill.
Mr. Crespo's 2011 vote
against same - sex
marriage is notable
because the bill passed the Assembly with relative ease and was overwhelmingly supported by New York City lawmakers.
he reminds Mps the organisation was
against gay
marriage because it would «put us in our trenches».
It finds efforts to legislate for humanist
marriage have been delayed, partly
because of the huge backlash
against the coalition government's bid to legalise same - sex
marriage.
In today's interview, Saland said he's views on gay
marriage started to turn in 2009, but he voted
against the December bill
because of the lack of religious carve outs.
Anti-gay activist groups The National Organization for
Marriage (NOM), Family Research Council Action and CitizenLink are launching «an unprecedented campaign» against three Republican candidates because of their support for marriage equality and abo
Marriage (NOM), Family Research Council Action and CitizenLink are launching «an unprecedented campaign»
against three Republican candidates
because of their support for
marriage equality and abo
marriage equality and abo... Read
From the first time he came to mainstream media's attention in 1994 proclaiming that the Gay Games in New York that year would spread AIDS in the city, to his resignation from the Civilian Complaint Review Board
because of the constant protest from the LGBT community, to his attacks on the Harvey Milk School and his bussing in evangelical Christians from the tri-state area to stage a protest
against gay
marriage on the steps of the Bronx County Courthouse, he has crusaded
against the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community.
Bruno also admitted in the spring of 2009 (while out - of - power and facing trial on corruption charges) that he personally favored same - sex
marriage but never brought it the floor of the State Senate
because the majority of his conference was
against it, stating «This is America, and we have inalienable rights... Life is short, and we should all be afforded the same opportunities and rights to enjoy it.»
There is a blessing in
marriage, that's when you do it the right way, but if you are single and have to wait for someone to divorce in order to marry you, then I can surely tell you, your
marriage won't begin with God,
because God is
against what you are praying for.
In 2011, she voted
against gay
marriage because, «I thought the bill would have the unintended consequences of lawsuits
against religious institutions that did not want to perform the
marriages,» she said.
During that lunch, I explained to him the discrimination Scott Stringer demonstrated
against a qualified Hispanic woman who,
because of her religious beliefs, is opposed to
marriage between a man and a man, or a woman and a woman,» Mr. Díaz said.
What George may not remember is that Ulster County voted
against him
because of his stance and votes on key issues ~
marriage equality (he voted
against gay
marriage) ~ and he has stated that he is opposed to abortion regardless of reason (including the potential death of the mother)....
why should I be discriminated
against and not allowed to marry
because George Amedore is opposed to homosexual
marriage....
Anti-gay New York State Senator Ruben Diaz Sr., who was targeted today by Fight Back NY
because of his ongoing battle
against marriage equality, remained defiant, telling the Gotham Gazette: «The people of my district are very smart people they aren»... Read
Your molecular clock is ticking faster 22.11.2009 High vitamin D level lengthens life expectancy of elderly Dutch 21.11.2009 Constant fight
against appetite reduces life expectancy 09.11.2009 Stress reduces life expectancy at molecular level 07.11.2009 Animal study: melatonin extends lifespan 25.10.2009 Fish fatty acids reduce age - related physical performance decline 24.10.2009 Old muscles weaker, but tire less quickly than young ones 23.10.2009 How creatine lengthens your lifespan 20.10.2009 Melatonin keeps brain cells young 03.10.2009 Long
marriage adds years to your life 18.09.2009 Drink three cups of tea a day and add five years to your life 11.09.2009 Life extending bacteria found in gut of Chinese centenarians 08.08.2009 Your initials determine how old you get 30.07.2009 Lecithin anti-aging supplement keeps hearing sharp 18.06.2009 Live ten years longer with just one multivitamin pill per day 06.06.2009 Life - extending effect of virgin olive oil shown in fat rats 22.05.2009 Daily dose of Echinacea lengthens life expectancy 24.04.2009 The less you sit, the older you'll get 21.04.2009 Animal study: nori contains life prolonging substance 06.04.2009 Vegetarianism is healthy, but not
because of lack of animal protein 27.03.2009 Meditation lengthens lifespan 20.02.2009 Live longer with healthy fats 30.12.2008 Vitamin D delays aging at genetic level 28.12.2008 Physical exercise delays molecular aging by ten years 25.12.2008 How a low - carb diet helps
against aging 23.12.2008 Vitamin D extends your life expectancy 22.12.2008 Too much growth hormone reduces life expectancy 07.11.2008 S - Words extend lifespan of writers and psychologists 11.10.2008 Creatine extends lifespan of mice 08.10.2008 Slim - waisted rats live longer 23.09.2008 Gingko lengthens rats» lifespan 12.09.2008 Strong men live longer 31.08.2008 Male orgasm prolongs life 23.08.2008 Ginkgo prolongs life 17.08.2008 Ginkgo protects the elderly
against the first signs of Alzheimer's 16.08.2008
Later describing himself as an atheist who is becoming more open - minded toward faith, Oswalt questions the widely - held practice of respecting other's beliefs and proceeds to attack those who vote
against gay
marriage amendments
because «they like a book», equating the Bible with any old literature.
Thorne - Begland's opponents argued that they voted
against him not
because he was gay, but rather
because his advocacy «amounted to military insubordination and a challenge to the state constitution, which bans gay
marriage and civil unions,» the Post reports.
The Christian owner of a B&B in Berkshire was found to have discriminated
against a gay couple by refusing to allow them stay in a double - bedded room
because of her belief that all sexual activity outside of
marriage is wrong.
LSUC benchers voted in April 2014 not to accredit the law school proposed by TWU, a British Columbia - based evangelical Christian university,
because of its community covenant that asks students to refrain from «sexual intimacy that violates the sacredness of
marriage between a man and a woman,» a stipulation critics argue is discriminatory
against LGBTQ individuals.
One of the cases being heard in Belfast will be Lee v Ashers Baking Company Ltd, in which the Justices will hear arguments on whether a bakery directly discriminated
against a customer on the grounds of sexual orientation when the bakery said they could not fulfil an order for a cake with «Support Gay
Marriage» written on it
because of their religious beliefs.
courts, and until the time of James I, it was punished through the instrumentality of those tribunals not merely
because ecclesiastical rights had been violated, but
because upon the separation of the ecclesiastical courts from the civil the ecclesiastical were supposed to be the most appropriate for the trial of matrimonial causes and offences
against the rights of
marriage, just as they were for testamentary causes and the settlement of the estates of deceased persons.