Actually, that passage IS USED
against masturbation.
Of course the church is
against masturbation, this leads to a good defense on why the priest are allowed to molest children.
«These natural God given drives are to be reigned in based on God's moral imperatives however the prohibition
against masturbation is not listed in any of God's statements.»
I'm not sure I had ever seen a poorer argument
against masturbation.
Not exact matches
Five went on the record
against superstar comedian Louis C.K., accusing him of various forms of sexual misconduct, mostly involving
masturbation.
In the Middle Ages,
masturbation and «unnatural positions» were considered more severe offenses
against the ordinances of God than were rape or incest.
But few of us would endorse those elements of tradition that baptize patriarchal oppression, endorse violence
against women, oppress lesbians and gays, exalt perpetual virginity as the superior state, or declare that heterosexual rape is a lesser sin than
masturbation (on the view that the latter act contradicts nature while the former act, while also sinful, is in accordance with nature) The postbiblical tradition, like Scripture itself, does not provide one coherent, consistent sexual ethic.
Utah parents seek criminal penalties
against teacher who they say went too far in sex ed class: «The Jordan School District is investigating allegations that a seventh - and eighth - grade health teacher violated the sex education statute by responding to questions from students about topics beyond the core curriculum, including homosexual sex, oral sex and
masturbation.»
It should come as no surprise that an archival search of the U.S. Patent Office yields an embarrassment of riches regarding various contraptions for guarding
against self - abuse (
masturbation) and nocturnal seminal emissions (wet dreams) in human males.