Not exact matches
The UFT is hitting the airwaves today with a 60 - second radio spot that slams for - profit
charter school management companies as «
more interested in making money and ducking accountability than fighting for our kids» and spending «millions on false attacks
against teachers and public
schools.»
The Working Families Party is ramping up its rhetoric
against charter school exec Eva Moskowitz in a sharply - worded letter set to be released to
more than 100,000 members this evening.
That pits him
against Governor Andrew Cuomo on yet another education issue; the governor has said he hopes to break the public -
school «monopoly» by encouraging
more competition from
charter schools.
At nearly the same time, about a thousand members of the city teachers union arrived in Albany to rally for
more education aid and
against Cuomo's plans, which include tougher teacher evaluations and
more charter schools.
ALBANY — The Democratic - controlled state Senate last night passed legislation to
more than double the number of
charter schools — infuriating teachers - union officials who immediately declared war
against the lawmakers who voted for the bill.
The group, a nonprofit advocacy organization formed in 2001 and historically funded by teachers unions, has long offered itself as a voice for parents and communities of color and, as such, has also been a thorn in the side of successive state and city governments, consistently pushing for
more funding in the state budget to meet the needs of underserved
schools and fighting
against school closures and
charter schools.
Groups like Citizen Action and the Alliance for Quality Education have long been fighting
against tests used to determine if teachers and
schools are effective and are fighting the push by members of the current
school board for
more charter schools and potentially conversion of some public
schools into
charters.
This could reflect the activities that receive media coverage or districts» acting
more covertly when they are working
against charter schools.
Charter Schools Do Not Appear to Discriminate Against Special Education Students Students with disabilities more likely to remain in charters than in district
Schools Do Not Appear to Discriminate
Against Special Education Students Students with disabilities
more likely to remain in
charters than in district
schoolsschools
Paul Hill, in his introduction to this volume, argues that this is due in part to the difficulty encountered in starting new
schools, but also because the playing field has been tilted
more sharply
against charter schools than the enthusiasts first understood.
Concerns about
charter schools include them challenging the long - existing status quo (there are
more than 4,000 in the U.S.); adding fuel to the debate of vouchers, markets, and choice; and affecting the funding of traditional
schools, seemingly pitting
charter activists
against traditional
school educators.
With all this evidence apparently stacked
against charter schools, it seems downright responsible of the AFT to call for a moratorium on further
charter school expansion «until
more convincing evidence of their effectiveness and viability is presented.»
More still support
charter schools than oppose them, with 36 percent
against (one in four of those polled was neutral).
We should ask ourselves why we keep pitting
charter schools against neighborhood public
schools — a strategy that has created little
more than a disruptive churn.
At the same time he is asking unions to become
more inclusive by becoming «democratic,» he rails
against Scott Walker, Paul Ryan, conservatives, white - populated areas of the state, right - wing Republicans, privatization, corporate reformers,
charter schools, vouchers, etc..
The team has developed an innovative method of comparing results for
charter students
against their «virtual twins» in district
schools, and translating hard - to - understand standard deviation measures into a
more easily digestible «additional days of learning.»
Newsom said he was «vehemently
against» private for - profit
charter schools, and that
more scrutiny is needed of how of the growing
charter school sector is spending public funds.
If the vote is
against reform, allowing parents to have the choice of
charter schools will become even
more essential.
Although he fails to provide any evidence that the inappropriate use of restraint and seclusion practices are
more prevalent in
charters than traditional
schools, he cites the allegations made in two lawsuits filed
against charter schools in D.C. at length, which amounts to little
more than a cheap shot.
Absent attention at the state and local level, we will have far
more OCR complaints (e.g., the ACLU filed a complaint
against charter schools in Delaware alleging discrimination by race, income and disability on December 5th) stemming from tacit acceptance of lack of access.
Ignoring Connecticut's collapsing fiscal situation, the Governor and legislature actually handed the
charter schools even
more scarce public funds, even though those
schools discriminate
against Connecticut children by refusing to accept and educate their fair share of students who require special education services and those who aren't proficient in the English language and therefore need additional English language services.
In the film, the single mom teams up with others to turn the failing
school into a
charter school and the teachers union fights
against reforms, such as greater teacher accountability and
more school choice.
More specifically, the union is demonstrating against a plan by several foundations, including his, to create more charter schools in Los Ange
More specifically, the union is demonstrating
against a plan by several foundations, including his, to create
more charter schools in Los Ange
more charter schools in Los Angeles.
CCSA fights
against these attempts to burden
charter schools with
more red tape.
When the matter of inappropriate discipline was raised — this was what all speaking
against the plans for a new
charter school found most alarming — there were attempts by Achievement First reps to brush the issue aside by repeating that almost half of the suspension / expulsion data was due to In School Suspensions, which they defined as when a student was removed from the classroom for more than two hours at a
school found most alarming — there were attempts by Achievement First reps to brush the issue aside by repeating that almost half of the suspension / expulsion data was due to In
School Suspensions, which they defined as when a student was removed from the classroom for more than two hours at a
School Suspensions, which they defined as when a student was removed from the classroom for
more than two hours at a time.
For now the Asociación de Maestros de Puerto Rico will continue mobilizing
against the
charter and voucher proposals, and Díaz said they are also going to start
more vocally championing for public
schools that provide robust wraparound social services.
The question was defeated with 62 % voting
against the measure and 38 % voting in favor of lifting the cap and allowing
more charter schools in Massachusetts.
Three weeks ago at the Birth to Five Water Cooler produced by Advancement Project California, which included discussions with leading gubernatorial candidates, Newsom said he was «vehemently
against» private for - profit
charter schools, and that
more scrutiny is needed of how the growing
charter school sector is spending public funds.
Wentzell unilaterally decided that the law allowing complaints
against public
schools does not apply to
charters; despite the fact that
charters receive
more than $ 100 million each year in public taxpayer dollars.
On the street, about 100 teachers rallied
against the effort by the Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation that would
more than double the number of
charter school students in LA Unified over the next eight years.
Gardner joined other parents and a vocal group of educators before the Wisconsin Assembly Education Committee in January to speak out
against AB1, a bill proposed by state lawmakers that would give significantly
more funding to
charter schools and green light voucher expansion.
Excellent point — and now
Charters are not required by law or policy to reduce racial isolation in fact, nearly every single
charter school in CT is
more racial isolated than the community they draw from and consistently discriminate
against Latino Students, students who aren't fluent in the English Language and students who require special education services.
When the Journey 4 Justice Alliance (which is little
more than a union - funded front group) filed a series of specious civil rights complaints
against the
school systems in Newark, Chicago, and New Orleans back in 2014, I wrote that the actions seemed to herald «a cynical shift in strategy by reform opponents» to paint
charters in a racially - divisive light.