The Broad plan, and others like it, funded by groups such as the Walton Family Foundation, are instead part of a coordinated national effort to decimate public schooling by rigging the system
against neighborhood public schools and the students they serve.
We should ask ourselves why we keep pitting charter schools
against neighborhood public schools — a strategy that has created little more than a disruptive churn.
Not exact matches
But these conflicts operate within the same conceptual framework:
Public education is the
neighborhood school, and all alternatives must be justified
against it — if they are to be supported at all.
As a current example of ever - larger traditional
public schools, the Chicago Board of Education is closing fifty traditional
schools at one time and sending their students out of their
neighborhoods to ever - larger
schools against continuing parent protests.
But these conflicts operate within the same conceptual framework:
Public education is the
neighborhood school, and all alternatives must be justified
against it - if they are to be supported at all.
Those who rail
against any sort of privatizing have either an obsessive and romanticized notion of the «
neighborhood public school,» or they belong to a group that benefits financially from the status quo.
So now we have a full - blown greed - driven, politically motivated power struggle pitting those wishing to end
neighborhood public schools, as we have known them,
against those wanting to preserve and improve them.