When an order grants relief for a nonparty or may be enforced
against a nonparty, the procedure for enforcing the order is the same as for a party.
While acknowledging the reality of this threat, the Court noted that the argument «flies in the face of the rule
against nonparty preclusion,» which «perforce leads to relitigation of many issues &» Smith, slip op.
Not exact matches
Yet a defendant threatened with punishment for injuring a
nonparty victim has no opportunity to defend
against the charge, by showing, for example in a case such as this, that the other victim was not entitled to damages because he or she knew that smoking was dangerous or did not rely upon the defendant's statements to the contrary.
Historically, the practice of funding legal action in exchange for future remuneration has been governed by the common law doctrines of champerty and maintenance, which emerged to safeguard a party's best interests and protect the administration of justice
against abuse from
nonparties.