Sentences with phrase «against paying child support»

Not exact matches

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.
It can be tempting for exes to try to retaliate against each other, and sadly, one of the ways paying parents try to do this is by skipping out on all of part of their child support obligations.
If the father does not pay the ordered child support then enforcement steps can be taken against him; examples being the suspension of his driver's license, the cancellation of his passport, and in extreme cases jail.
Since child support can be ordered retroactively for up to 24 months in an initial child support case, the court can consider proof of child support paid by one parent to the other and typically the court will give a credit to the paying spouse for the amount of child support paid against the child support arrearage owed.
The court also considered the other enunciated factors: in law, «blameworthy conduct» could include failure to pay child support (which was not the case here), but the refusal to disclose income had to be viewed against the fact that the mother did not request disclosure until 2011, which was almost 13 years after the initial child support order had been made.
Since the Supreme Court of Canada decision in D.B.S. v. S.R.G. 2006 SCC 37, retroactive child support orders have been made pretty frequently against parents who have not been paying child support in accordance with the Federal Child Support Guidelchild support orders have been made pretty frequently against parents who have not been paying child support in accordance with the Federal Child Support Guidsupport orders have been made pretty frequently against parents who have not been paying child support in accordance with the Federal Child Support Guidelchild support in accordance with the Federal Child Support Guidsupport in accordance with the Federal Child Support GuidelChild Support GuidSupport Guidelines.
A parent who has failed to pay costs related to the child's birth despite being aware of and able to pay such costs will be considered to have acted against the child's best interest, as will a parent who has the ability to provide a child with financial support and has failed to do so.
The court held that the ex-husband was entitled to reimbursement for support up to the child's 22nd birthday, the ex-husband did not have fraud, intentional infliction of emotional distress or an unjust enrichment claims against the biological father, the biological father did not have a cross-claim for contribution against the mother, since she had paid her share of support.
Any portion of lump sum payments of retroactive Social Security Disability benefits paid to children not credited against the existing child support arrearage is properly treated as a gratuity to the children.
Since the Supreme Court of Canada decision in D.B.S. v. S.R.G. 2006 SCC 37, retroactive child support orders have been made pretty frequently against parents who have not been paying child support in accordance with the Federal Child Support -LSB-... read full child support orders have been made pretty frequently against parents who have not been paying child support in accordance with the Federal Child Support -LSB-... read fulsupport orders have been made pretty frequently against parents who have not been paying child support in accordance with the Federal Child Support -LSB-... read full child support in accordance with the Federal Child Support -LSB-... read fulsupport in accordance with the Federal Child Support -LSB-... read full Child Support -LSB-... read fulSupport -LSB-... read full post]
Instead, the court ruled the parent paying support is only entitled to recover the overpayment of the child support payments against his / her share of the statutory add - on expenses (the portion of child support intended to cover child care and educational and special needs).
In the case Coull v. Rottman, a family court ruled it would violate public policy to allow the paying parent to take a credit against future child support payments in order to recoup the overpayments.
By paying child support you are supporting a broken, inefficient and unjust system that discriminates against you on the basis of your gender.
Judge Suzanne Stovall disregarded 3 + years & 300 + exhibited provable charges of Contempt against the mother, including failure to pay child support, interfering with child custody, & worse.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z