Not exact matches
I don't think it's so much about the levites being
paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial
support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their
support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but
pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to
support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be
paid for their service either don't know they need to be
paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything
against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should
support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to
support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to
support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars,
children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people
supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to
support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.
It can be tempting for exes to try to retaliate
against each other, and sadly, one of the ways
paying parents try to do this is by skipping out on all of part of their
child support obligations.
If the father does not
pay the ordered
child support then enforcement steps can be taken
against him; examples being the suspension of his driver's license, the cancellation of his passport, and in extreme cases jail.
Since
child support can be ordered retroactively for up to 24 months in an initial
child support case, the court can consider proof of
child support paid by one parent to the other and typically the court will give a credit to the
paying spouse for the amount of
child support paid against the
child support arrearage owed.
The court also considered the other enunciated factors: in law, «blameworthy conduct» could include failure to
pay child support (which was not the case here), but the refusal to disclose income had to be viewed
against the fact that the mother did not request disclosure until 2011, which was almost 13 years after the initial
child support order had been made.
Since the Supreme Court of Canada decision in D.B.S. v. S.R.G. 2006 SCC 37, retroactive
child support orders have been made pretty frequently against parents who have not been paying child support in accordance with the Federal Child Support Guidel
child support orders have been made pretty frequently against parents who have not been paying child support in accordance with the Federal Child Support Guid
support orders have been made pretty frequently
against parents who have not been
paying child support in accordance with the Federal Child Support Guidel
child support in accordance with the Federal Child Support Guid
support in accordance with the Federal
Child Support Guidel
Child Support Guid
Support Guidelines.
A parent who has failed to
pay costs related to the
child's birth despite being aware of and able to
pay such costs will be considered to have acted
against the
child's best interest, as will a parent who has the ability to provide a
child with financial
support and has failed to do so.
The court held that the ex-husband was entitled to reimbursement for
support up to the
child's 22nd birthday, the ex-husband did not have fraud, intentional infliction of emotional distress or an unjust enrichment claims
against the biological father, the biological father did not have a cross-claim for contribution
against the mother, since she had
paid her share of
support.
Any portion of lump sum payments of retroactive Social Security Disability benefits
paid to
children not credited
against the existing
child support arrearage is properly treated as a gratuity to the
children.
Since the Supreme Court of Canada decision in D.B.S. v. S.R.G. 2006 SCC 37, retroactive
child support orders have been made pretty frequently against parents who have not been paying child support in accordance with the Federal Child Support -LSB-... read full
child support orders have been made pretty frequently against parents who have not been paying child support in accordance with the Federal Child Support -LSB-... read ful
support orders have been made pretty frequently
against parents who have not been
paying child support in accordance with the Federal Child Support -LSB-... read full
child support in accordance with the Federal Child Support -LSB-... read ful
support in accordance with the Federal
Child Support -LSB-... read full
Child Support -LSB-... read ful
Support -LSB-... read full post]
Instead, the court ruled the parent
paying support is only entitled to recover the overpayment of the
child support payments
against his / her share of the statutory add - on expenses (the portion of
child support intended to cover
child care and educational and special needs).
In the case Coull v. Rottman, a family court ruled it would violate public policy to allow the
paying parent to take a credit
against future
child support payments in order to recoup the overpayments.
By
paying child support you are
supporting a broken, inefficient and unjust system that discriminates
against you on the basis of your gender.
Judge Suzanne Stovall disregarded 3 + years & 300 + exhibited provable charges of Contempt
against the mother, including failure to
pay child support, interfering with
child custody, & worse.