If you have people trying to buy marijuana in Colorado and then sell it for an even greater profit in Nebraska, the federal government is going to look into that problem and probably bring charges
against people because it's illegal in Nebraska and you are transporting stuff from state A to state B in an unlawful manner.
Both Federal and state laws prohibit private persons, organizations or governments from discriminating
against people because of certain «protected characteristics.»
Age discrimination is defined as a «systematic stereotyping of and discrimination
against people because they are old, just as racism and sexism accomplish this with skin color and gender.»
How about when we routinely discriminated
against people because of sexual preference?
He should learn how to abide by our laws that reject employment discrimination
against people because of sex, color, race nationality, religion, sexual preference, etc..
We both bitterly opposed Section 28 which discriminated
against people because of their sexuality... Thanks to pioneers like Chris, Labour now has 19 openly LGBT MPs and Parliament has a record high of 45 members — the highest of any legislature in the world.»
Believe what you will, but discrimination
against people because of their personal preferences is in no way admirable.
It is the policy of Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to provide equal opportunity in employment throughout the corporation for all qualified applicants and employees without discrimination
against any person because of a person's race, color, religion (including religious dress and grooming practices), sex / gender (including pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions and breast feeding), national origin, ancestry, gender identity, gender expression, legally - protected medical condition, physical or mental disability, age, military or veteran status, marital status, sexual orientation, genetic information or any other basis protected by applicable law.
Frank Sobrino, the governor's deputy director of communications for New York City, responded in an email that «under existing state law, it is already unlawful for any person to refuse to buy from, sell, or trade with or otherwise discriminate
against any person because of race, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, and disability among other classifications.»
There is no room for violence of any kind, especially violence
against a person because of his or her religious beliefs.
The Gender Tax Repeal Act provides that «No business establishment may discriminate, with respect to the price charged for services,
against a person because of the person's gender.»
Amends § § 4112.02, 4112.05, 4112.08, and 4112.14 of the Revised Code to specify that discrimination by an employer
against any person because of the person's credit history is an unlawful discriminatory practice under the Ohio Civil Rights Law.
The Pennsylvania State University prohibits discrimination and harassment
against any person because of age, ancestry, color, disability or handicap, national origin, race, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, or veteran status.
15 The Board shall not certify a trade union if any employer or any employers» organization has participated in its formation or administration or has contributed financial or other support to it or if it discriminates
against any person because of any ground of discrimination prohibited by the Human Rights Code or the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
It is also illegal to retaliate
against a person because he or she complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit.
It is also unlawful to discriminate
against a person because they do not have a religion or a belief.
This means that it is unlawful for an employer to discriminate
against a person because of their religion or belief.
The Ontario Human Rights Code also prohibits discrimination
against a person because the person has a relationship, association or other dealing with a person or persons who are identified by one of the grounds listed above.
It specifically provides that government and public agency staff should exercise religious neutrality in the exercise of their functions, which implies not favouring or discriminating
against a person because of membership or not in a specific religion.
It is illegal to discriminate
against any person because of race, color, religion, sex, familial status, national origin, military status, disability or ancestry.
It is illegal to discriminate
against any person because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or nation of origin.
It is illegal to discriminate
against any person because of race, color, religion, gender, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
It is illegal to discriminate
against any person because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
Not exact matches
«I think that networks are in a tough position right now, where they have shows that a lot of
people watch — much more than cable shows that are considered «hits» — but they're not allowed to call them hits
because they're up
against an old system.»
Trouble is, those readers will be bidding
against people who are buying that stuff not just
because they're smart, but
because they have to.
How do I reach out and grab
people in different ways
because I'm never going to compete
against the big category spenders?
«Wait and see what happens on election day
because many
people who weren't for independence will now go and vote
against the police's response.
Kravetz, whose website is filled with large flashing photographs of brownie gift boxes, also warns
against trying to compete on free shipping alone: «I don't want to be the company that
people come to
because of free shipping.»
• Brittany Laughlin of Lattice VC argues
against zero - tolerance policies
because, she writes, the bar to report misconduct is currently too high, and we should give
people a chance to fix their mistakes:
«I have watched so many talented, creative, and inventive
people rage
against their work, or even worse, stop doing their work
because of the frustration that they encountered along the path of whatever it was they were trying to create.
It's easy to discriminate
against the minority cobbler down the street by traveling a few extra blocks to buy from «your own kind»; it's much harder to act out your racist biases when buying shoes at a big department store
because, well, you have no idea what colour or sex or sexual orientation of the
person who made those shoes is.
People suspected that if the charges
against him are dropped, DSK would run, and perhaps win
because of the mighty «comeback.»
Here are the states where you can still be fired for being gay
because they don't have explicit laws that prevent discrimination
against LGBT
people in the workplace.
That's the kind of «appointment viewing» that holds up the best
against digital streaming and other services,
because the in -
person aspect is such a huge part of the experience.
National Press Club president Thomas Burr asked Thiel if what happened to Gawker could happen to other news publications: «Could wealthy, powerful
people seek revenge
against a news organization
because of something they didn't like and use their influence and money to take them out?»
I * know * I have lost multiple jobs I could do in my sleep
because some of these
people spoke up
against me when it mattered.
Because people are inclined to insure
against negative consequences, you can strike an emotional chord by detailing what could happen if a customer does not follow through with your latest recommendation.
That's largely
because Donald Trump, who has seen one Wall Street super PAC raise $ 16 million
against him through the end of March, has neither been campaigning heavily for Wall Street money, nor has he been hugely popular among business
people.
A portion of the caption reads: «This is a transformation that I've been holding back from releasing for a while now, solely
because of the fear I've had of
people turning it into a racial scandal
against me.
People do this for many reasons, whether it's
because playing victim makes them feel good or
because they believe it's their duty to crusade
against injustice, and then they take it way too far.
And
because individual states could still prohibit marijuana locally, Booker's bill would also incentivize states to change their marijuana laws by withholding federal funding from any states that have enforced laws
against the drug in ways that disproportionately affect low - income citizens and
people of color.
He said however that Mr Noonan «is
against a write - down for the Greeks
because it wouldn't be in the interest of his party», but it would in the interests of 99 per cent of Irish
people who «share the same interests as Greece».
Mr. Trump also spoke at length about the standoff with armed protesters who last Saturday seized the headquarters at a federal wildlife refuge in Oregon, suggesting that he would have called the leader of the group to try to make a deal to end it — and would have acted
against them if negotiations failed
because «you can not let
people take over federal property.»
This time, the focus is more narrowly on ensuring that
people not be forced to agree to potential arbitration as a condition of their employment and that employers be prohibited from «threatening, retaliating or discriminating
against, or terminating any applicant for employment or prospective employment or any employee
because of the refusal to consent to the waiver of any right, forum, or procedure for a violation of specific statutes governing employment.»
«I think
people are hiding behind the fact that futures markets have 20 percent odds of a move, and the Fed would not go
against that, but my reading is that's not relevant in this case
because the market's never going to give them a green light.
Interesting topic... I struggle with this idea
because like most
people that I imagine read your blog, I earned the money... creating a legacy of family who does not have to provide for themselves goes
against my core beliefs.
Because once they heard how the
people they were trading
against were completely caught up in the mania and missing the bigger picture, it gave them the confidence to pile on their trade in even bigger size.
I decided —
against the advice of many
people at the time,
because it had a high cost attached to it — to take 10,000 store managers to New Orleans.
One of the things that happens is a lot of startups get pulled into the system and that's unfortunate,
because it turns out that when you've got this thing that's 18 % of GDP and you start following the money flows, you enter a market in one place with a very altruistic notion that I'm going to change things, and ask things morph, it turns out you're actually just helping the system get bigger and helping
people collect, if you will, as a leach
against the system.
It is disturbing not
because of Bitcoin Core's lack of enthusiasm for standing
against Segwit2x, which is the way it appeared, but rather it was the fact that the
people who support Segwit2x went to great lengths to confuse the general public about Segwit2x, what it meant, what it would do and even spent a good deal of time convincing
people it was not an option, but a requirement; a simple software upgrade.