The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists cautions
against a planned home birth if:
Not exact matches
A major study published in the UK (Birthplace in England Collaborative Group, 2011) has examined the risks of
planned home births, comparing them
against planned deliveries in hospitals and midwife units for low risk women.
The aim of this study is to compare the odds of postpartum haemorrhage among women who opt for
home birth against the odds of postpartum haemorrhage for those who
plan a hospital
birth.
Ideally — and particularly when offset
against virtually 100 % hospital
births in the rest of Europe — better evidence is needed before generalisations are made on the merits of
planned home birth.
Given the study's findings, Amos Grunebaum, M.D. and Frank Chervenak, M.D., the main authors of the study, said that obstetric practitioners have an ethical obligation to disclose the increased absolute and relative risks associated with
planned home birth to expectant parents who express an interest in this delivery setting, and to recommend strongly
against it.
The authors» main argument
against the proven cost - effectiveness of
planned home birth is that «the lifetime costs of supporting the neurologically disabled children who will result from
planned home birth» have not been factored in, nor have the supposedly increased rates of death.