These arguments are not
against professional judgment per se, but against its misuse in this case.
Not exact matches
Gawker Media founder and CEO Nick Denton will file for personal bankruptcy protection as early as Monday after losing a fight in a Florida court for a shield
against a
judgment in a breach of privacy case involving
professional wrestler Hulk Hogan, according to a person familiar with the matter.
While guarding
against a rush to
judgment, we can easily think of ministries that are pushing all or many of the current success buttons: they are carried out by a
professional elite; they utilize the best marketing and media techniques; they dispense a personal fulfillment strategy to essentially anonymous folk who are regarded as consumers and called to respond in carefully prescribed ways which do not implicate them or their leadership in the more complex and controversial human issues.
For instance, the judge granted summary
judgment against the NCAA on its argument that scholarship rules «improve [e] the quality of the collegiate experience for student - athletes, other students, and alumni by maintaining the unique heritage and traditions of college athletics and preserving amateurism as a foundational principle, thereby distinguishing amateur college athletics from
professional sports, allowing the former to exist as a distinct form of athletic rivalry and as an essential component of a comprehensive college education.»
In a complicated construction dispute between window subcontractor and other construction
professionals sued for equitable indemnity and contribution, the Fourth District, Division 1 reversed and affirmed some fee awards
against window subcontractor after overturning a
judgment on the pleadings, affirming a summary
judgment as to one party, and giving effect to a prior appellate decision overturning
judgments in favor of the parties sued by window subcontractor.
Moore - Bick LJ, giving the leading
judgment identified the primary issue as being «whether a person who suffers damage as a result of findings of personal or
professional misconduct leading to dismissal and loss of
professional status that were made
against him in disciplinary proceedings conducted in breach of contract, but which would not otherwise have been made, can recover damages at large».
A # 3 million appeal concerning the proper approach to quantum in a concurrent liability case
against a
professional and the Judge's duty to give a reasoned
judgment (drawing on Ed's earlier experience in English v. Emery Reimbold).
Conducted to
judgment or settlement over 500 negligence and misleading and deceptive conduct claims
against hotel operators, property developers and associated
professional firms arising out of property marketing scams in Australia.
Under Georgia law, if the «allegations of negligence
against a
professional involve the exercise of
professional skill and
judgment within [his] area of expertise, the action states
professional negligence.»
... We affirm the
judgment against his current client, without prejudice to the client's seeking post-conviction relief on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel, and we order Derkunt to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for
professional misconduct in this court.
The
judgment will do nothing to quell the worry amongst
professional indemnity insurers (and some solicitors) that there is likely to be an increase in the number of
professional negligence claims
against solicitors arising from the way in which historic personal injury cases have been conducted.
A # 3 - million appeal concerning the proper approach to quantum in a concurrent liability case
against a
professional and the Judge's duty to give a reasoned
judgment (drawing on Ed's earlier experience in English v. Emery Reimbold).
The rule waives the requirement for individual agreement if the victim is unable to agree due to incapacity or other emergency circumstance and: (1) The law enforcement official represents that the protected health information is needed to determine whether a violation of law by a person other than the victim has occurred and the information is not intended to be used
against the victim; (2) the law enforcement official represents that immediate law enforcement activity that depends on such disclosure would be materially and adversely affected by waiting until the individual is able to agree to the disclosure; and (3) the covered entity, in the exercise of
professional judgment, determines that the disclosure is in the individual's best interests.
The final rule waives the requirement for agreement if the covered entity is unable to obtain the individual's agreement due to incapacity or other emergency circumstance, and (1) the law enforcement official represents that the information is needed to determine whether a violation of law by a person other than the victim has occurred and the information is not intended to be used
against the victim; (2) the law enforcement official represents that immediate law enforcement activity that depends on the disclosure would be materially and adversely affected by waiting until the individual is able to agree to the disclosure; and (3) the covered entity determines, in the exercise of
professional judgment, that the disclosure is in the individual's best interests.
Third, this paragraph allows covered entities to disclose protected health information about an individual without the individual's agreement if the disclosure is expressly authorized by statute or regulation and either: (1) The covered entity, in the exercise of its
professional judgment, believes that the disclosure is necessary to prevent serious harm to the individual or to other potential victims; or (2) if the individual is unable to agree due to incapacity, a law enforcement or other public official authorized to received the report represents that the protected health information for which disclosure is sought is not intended to be used
against the individual, and that an immediate enforcement activity that depends on the disclosure would be materially and adversely affected by waiting until the individual is able to agree to the disclosure.
185 DOS 05 DOS v. Britt - disclosure of conditions affecting the value or desirability of listed premises; DOS fails its burden of proof; res judicata;
judgment rendered in civil court between buyer and seller is not controlling in administrative proceeding
against licensee where DOS and licensee were not parties in the civil suit and
professional conduct of the licensee was not litigated; duty of disclosure to a buyer by a seller's agent is derivative; seller's agent must make the same disclosure to a buyer that the law requires a seller to make; disclosure by seller's agent to buyer's agent of the condition of the property as known by seller's agent was timely, proper and essentially a disclosure to buyer of that information; DOS has failed to prove by substantial evidence its allegation that basement flooding was a common occurrence or that broker was fully aware that homes in the neighborhood where the property is located encountered frequent flooding; complaint dismissed
If you register as an Real Estate
Professional User, you represent, warrant, and agree that: (1) you are a licensed real estate broker, or licensed real estate agent, and if you are an agent user of the Elm Street Website, you have the permission of your managing broker to register as a Elm Street Real Estate
Professional User; (2) you are a member, subscriber or participant in good standing of the Multiple Listing Service that supplies the real estate data and images displayed to you on the Elm Street Website («MLS»); (3) you will terminate your account status if, at any time, you are no longer a licensed real estate broker, or licensed real estate agent, and therefore, are no longer eligible to be a member, subscriber, or participant in good standing of the MLS; (4) you authorize Elm Street to send you emails relating to the Elm Street Website and your Elm Street account; and (5) you will defend, indemnify and hold harmless Elm Street, and its members, managers, subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, employees, agents, and other partners
against any and all claims, damages,
judgments, and expenses, including attorney» s fees and litigation costs or expenses, arising from your breach of the representations, warranties, duties or obligations made or assumed by you in this Agreement.