Not exact matches
Yet its potency has been greatly reduced, particularly as a weapon
against officers and
directors of
public companies.
This provides protection to both the shareholders (who have some protection
against abuse by the
directors) and the
public — who can have some confidence that doing business with the
company will not cause them loss through imminent bankruptcy of their counterparty.
(7) According to her family one of those responsible for denying basic information around Cáceres» case is Honduras»
Director of
Public Attorneys, Jose Arturo Duarte, who represented the dam
company DESA in past legal actions
against Cáceres» organisation COPINH.
His work involved considering policy response and coverage issues as well as managing claims
against (amongst others) architects, engineers, design and build contractors, surveyors, valuers, charity trustees and
directors and officers of both private and
public limited
companies.
The annual Haynes and Boone Securities Litigation Year in Review comments on significant securities - related decisions by the Supreme Court, federal appellate courts and district courts, notes key developments in SEC enforcement, and summarizes significant rulings in state law fiduciary litigation
against directors and officers of
public companies.
Our legal team has defended litigation brought
against directors and officers employed in all types of
public and private
companies, including banks and financial institutions.
Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP (PSW) brought an action for breach of fiduciary duty owed to creditors and shareholders
against the former officers and
directors of Tripath Technology Inc., a high - tech
public company that filed for bankruptcy in 2007.
John Batter's practice focuses on the defense of
public and private
companies and their
directors and management
against breach of fiduciary duty claims and securities fraud... Read More
According to the CBI charge sheet, Paramount Airways Pvt Ltd (PAPL), its managing
director M Thiagrajan, then CMD of Oriental Insurance
Company Ltd (OICL) M Ramadoss, and three other officers were accused of causing wrongful loss to five public sector banks and the insurance company, against which claims of Rs 442 crore were raised due to payment defaults by the a
Company Ltd (OICL) M Ramadoss, and three other officers were accused of causing wrongful loss to five
public sector banks and the insurance
company, against which claims of Rs 442 crore were raised due to payment defaults by the a
company,
against which claims of Rs 442 crore were raised due to payment defaults by the airline.
If successful, both individuals will be punished with «permanent injunctions, [the] return of allegedly ill - gotten gains plus interest and penalties, as well as bars
against Sharma and Farkas serving as
public company officers or
directors and from participating in any offering of digital or other securities.»
The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, the return of allegedly misappropriated gains plus interest and other penalties, as well as bars
against Sharma and Farkas serving as
public company officers or
directors and from participating in any offering of digital or other securities.