Sentences with phrase «against scientists whose»

In an embarrassing display of scientific illiteracy and political gullibility, news organizations have repeatedly played into the deniers» hands: Implicitly endorsing their unfounded accusations of fraud against scientists whose emails were stolen, by portraying a single error in a thousand - page Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report as reason to question all of mainstream climate science.

Despite repeated rejection by the scientific community, it has spawned a movement, led to thousands of legal claims, and even triggered occasional harassment and threats against scientists whose research appears to discredit it.

The advocacy group Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) has taken up Monnett's cause, calling the apparently criminal investigation a politically - motivated «witch hunt» against a scientist whose research threatens the government's ability to drill in the Arctic.

Not exact matches

AAAS President Susan Hockfield and APS President Laura H. Greene, whose scientific societies represent more than 170,000 scientists and engineers, called on Rouhani to step in and examine «irregularities» in the handling of charges leveled against the a 45 - year - old Djalali.

Called PaMZ, the pill is a combination of the standard TB drug pyrazinamide with the antibiotic moxifloxacin — not previously used against TB — and PA - 824, a drug whose potential against TB was reported by New Scientist in 2001.

Consider that he ran for the presidency against Ronald Reagan (and Jimmy Carter), but also aggressively debated other activist - scientists whose views on population and development strayed from his — most notably Paul Ehrlich of «Population Bomb» fame.

«The accusations that Willie's funding sources dictate what he writes in his research papers are of course untrue; as they would also be untrue if alleged against the many other distinguished scientists that you employ whose funding is derived from external sources.

For instance, Andrew Revkin of the New York Times reported that the scientists advising the Global Climate Coalition (GCC), a now defunct organization that spent millions of dollars in lobbying against climate change policies and whose members were primarily corporations whose operations or products were large producers of greenhouse gases, reported to the GCC that:

The plain simple truth is that decent scientists whose only «crime» is to happen to find evidence against doomsday global warming are constantly being prevented from publishing, from getting grants and are then being libelled by people such as this ******.

Jacobson has even suggested that he might take legal action against NOAA scientist Christopher Clack and twenty coauthors whose critical evaluation of his work was published by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in June.

Miller is a reputable scientist whose work rises above the data snooping, data mining and regression against increasing trends of self - opinionated verbiage (to borrow Briffa's phrase) that is too prevalent in the field.

You make unjustified and untrue ad homimem attacks on excellent scientists whose work provides doubt to AGW although their work has often been challenged but never faulted: e.g. you say «I have never argued against people like Lindzen and Christy and Spencer continuing to do their work and attempting to get it published in reputable peer - reviewed journals, even if their work does seem to become increasingly sloppy and desperate.»

Yet the very person whose past is exposed is making allegations of deceit and manipulation of evidence, use of propaganda against climate scientists and the IPCC, the NAS and other science orgs, and these charges stand and are repeated!

The saga of the global warming movement's jihad against skeptical scientists — including those whose skepticism of man - made climate change orthodoxy is moderate enough to make them dislike the «skeptic» label — has grown to include the formidable Dr. Judith Curry of the Georgia Institute of Technology.

Inhofe's witch - hunt against a named list of climate scientists echoes Rep. James Sensenbrenner's demand that scientists whose names appear in the stolen Climatic Research Unit e-mail file be blacklisted from the IPCC, on which we posted earlier:

From the article:... The saga of the global warming movement's jihad against skeptical scientists — including those whose skepticism of man - made climate change orthodoxy is moderate enough to make them dislike the «skeptic» label — has grown to include the formidable Dr. Judith Curry of the Georgia Institute of Technology.

That's one reason why yesterday I launched my shameless attempt to get Mann, whose defamation suit against me is now in its fourth year, to amend his complaint to the DC Superior Court yet again and this time demand the death penalty - for having the impertinence to publish a book full of what other scientists say about him:

Much like Bernie Madoff's ponzi scheme, this scheme, with its constant infusions of material that could be libel / slander against skeptic climate scientists, was also doomed to fail from the start, built on a foundation of sand about its core «evidence» that was pushed by a person who never won a Pulitzer, and whose narratives don't line up right.