These events coincide with the first international Day of the Girl on Thursday, and they remind us that the global struggle for gender equality is the paramount moral struggle of this century, equivalent to the campaigns
against slavery in the 19th century and against totalitarianism in the 20th century.
The Pastorius Monument (which was concealed / boxed over during WW I and II because the look of the monument was perceived to be too Germanic, not American enough) was created to celebrate Daniel Francis Pastorius, a German settler (who brought many of the first settlers with him) who led the first Quaker protest and fight
against slavery in 1688.
More important though, historically, is the role the story of the Amistad played in building the movement
against slavery in the United States.
Henry rejected liberal versions of the social gospel which tended to be all social and no gospel, but he appealed to an earlier evangelical consensus of cultural engagement that included the work of William Wilberforce in campaigning for the abolition of the slave trade in England, the revivalist impulses of Charles G. Finney
against slavery in this country, as well as evangelical concerns for suffrage, temperance, child labor laws, fair wages for workers, and many other progressive issues to which many theologically conservative Christians were once committed» before what David Moberg has called «the great reversal,» an evangelical withdrawal from such concerns.
The Churches could easily stand
against slavery in the days when nobody defended it, but now that it was the basis of the Southern economic empire what would they do?
The phrase is invoked particularly when LGBTQ advocates wish to connect their struggle to the struggle
against slavery in the nineteenth - century or for civil rights in the twentieth.
In the campaign
against slavery in the nineteenth century, Protestant churches used internal discipline and external pressure.
What church took a stand
against slavery in the South, in an unpopular area?
The Civil War as Theological Crisis by Mark Noll: This book is a stunning eye - opener that details the religious - based arguments for and
against slavery in the buildup to the U.S. Civil War.
Not exact matches
The false prophets or dreamers who try to lead you astray must be put to death, for they encourage rebellion
against the LORD your God, who brought you out of
slavery in the land of Egypt.
Previous historians have noted that most cultures justified
slavery, while the peculiarity of Christian ones lies
in also producing a movement
against it.
What good are morals if the one giving them supports morals that most people consider to be awful like
slavery and discrimination
against women, gays and the handicapped, as well as beating children and slaves without punishment
in some cases?
God's «morals» come
in handy for Christian h0mophobes looking for an EXCUSE for their prejudice, but are ignored when any discussions come up that are embarrassing like support for
slavery and discrimination
against the handicapped.
The notorious Dred Scott decision (1837) asserted that because slaves were their masters» property Congress could not ban
slavery anywhere
in the United States — a holding that ignored the Framers» compromise of tolerating
slavery temporarily but allowing eventual measures
against it.
In other words, this text is not about how to go to heaven when you die, but rather about how to go from slavery to death in this world as we war against others (Eph 2:1 - 3), to unity and peace with others as we live in the family of God (Eph 2:11 - 22
In other words, this text is not about how to go to heaven when you die, but rather about how to go from
slavery to death
in this world as we war against others (Eph 2:1 - 3), to unity and peace with others as we live in the family of God (Eph 2:11 - 22
in this world as we war
against others (Eph 2:1 - 3), to unity and peace with others as we live
in the family of God (Eph 2:11 - 22
in the family of God (Eph 2:11 - 22).
In Jesus» culture, (and indeed in many cultures today), the fatherless were especially vulnerable to poverty, exploitation, and injustice, often left without an advocate in the courts or a protector to guard them against hunger, slavery and traffickin
In Jesus» culture, (and indeed
in many cultures today), the fatherless were especially vulnerable to poverty, exploitation, and injustice, often left without an advocate in the courts or a protector to guard them against hunger, slavery and traffickin
in many cultures today), the fatherless were especially vulnerable to poverty, exploitation, and injustice, often left without an advocate
in the courts or a protector to guard them against hunger, slavery and traffickin
in the courts or a protector to guard them
against hunger,
slavery and trafficking.
And we
in the modern West are
against slavery and the racism that supported it, right?
He has waged cruel war
against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty
in the persons of a distant people, who never offended him, captivating and carrying them into
slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death
in their transportation thither.14
This was followed by five subsequent phases of development
in a regular pattern of succession: (1) the organization of home and foreign mission societies to channel new leadership into church planting or into the field; (2) the production and distribution of Christian literature; (3) the renewal and extension of Christian educational institutions; (4) attempts at «the reformation of manners» — i.e., the reassertion of Christian moral standards
in a decadent society; and (5) the great humanitarian crusades
against social evils like
slavery, war and intemperance.
For the British, it was the actual experience of
slavery in some of its most brutal forms
in the West Indies that precipitated thinking hard about
slavery, which then precipitated biblical and theological arguments
against it, which then led to political action.»
Woolman,
in particular, gave all his time and devotion to the concern of traveling around to various Quaker meetings and speaking his mind
against slavery.
«There is never any doubt
in the Bible that we are to treat others properly and New World form of
slavery where the person was the property of another was
against the law of God.»
In the years leading up to the schism, southern Baptists desired to make slavery a non-issue, while abolitionist forces in the North (and among northern Baptists) desired the convention to take a moral stand against i
In the years leading up to the schism, southern Baptists desired to make
slavery a non-issue, while abolitionist forces
in the North (and among northern Baptists) desired the convention to take a moral stand against i
in the North (and among northern Baptists) desired the convention to take a moral stand
against it.
Christian charity Care described it as a «landmark» moment
in the fight
against modern day
slavery.
CARE Northern Ireland Policy Officer Mark Baillie said: «This is a landmark moment
in the fight
against modern day
slavery.
They are therefore a powerful tool
in the fight
against modern
slavery.»
On March 26, a group of New York — based lawyers headed by Edward D. Fagan, who spearheaded successful suits on behalf of Holocaust survivors
against European firms that collaborated with the Nazis
in using concentration camp inmates as laborers, filed suit
in U.S. District Court
in Brooklyn
against FleetBoston Financial, the insurance giant Aetna, and railroad conglomerate CSX Corporation, on the grounds that these corporations are the successors of companies that profited from
slavery before the Civil War.
When a movement
against slavery was first introduced
in Europe and then America, some of the most vocal opponents to this movement came from Christians.
Citing examples of Christian mothers who were instrumental
in the abolition of
slavery and the passage of laws
against child labor, she makes a strong case that virtues such as compassion and creativity that are «refined
in the practice of motherhood can and should be used
in other arenas to bring God's love, peace, mercy and justice to the world.»
-- Contact your local officials and become an advocate
in the fight
against slavery & human trafficking.
Is
against slavery, but ignores the large number of verses
in the bible that obviously accept and promote
slavery.
for
in atlas and
in other rand works she puts forth the most eloquent and reasoned arguments
against slavery ever written.
Certainly
in recent history we can observe immoral thoughts and actions
against slaves or associated with
slavery as a whole.
The truly intimate God of revelation wishes dialogue with persons, and abhors a religious
slavery that
in turn invokes the accusation
against the divine that we can observe, for example,
in the writings of Nietzsche and Sartre.
After that, there were a few instances when popes condemned the Atlantic slave trade for its cruelties; and
in the 18th and 19th centuries, Protestant abolitionists
in England and America produced theological arguments
against slavery merely as such.
The American founders and Lincoln understood that the case
against slavery was grounded
in nature, and the moral case would be the same
in all «cultures» where that nature remained the same.
He fought
against slavery, he accepted women as equal even
in expounding theology, and he preached the necessity of bringing the Kingdom of righteousness into fruition.
We read of Indonesian school girls targeted and beheaded simply because they were Christians; of Nigerian Christian men forced to chose between conversion to Islam or death, and of their wives and children forced to chose between conversion or perpetual
slavery; of Pakistani Christians being burned alive
in their homes; of Coptic Christians
in Egypt and Chaldean Catholics
in Iraq being fire - bombed, maimed and killed» and when not killed, hounded into exile; of «religious apartheid» and executions
in Iran; and of unspeakable atrocities
against Christians
in the Sudan, the «scene of suffering as abhorrent as anywhere on any continent.»
This was notably the case
in the successful campaign
against Negro
slavery,
in the many efforts, not so successful, to curb war and bring about international peace,
in the Red Cross for ministering to the sufferers from war and from natural disasters,
in the inauguration of the modern nursing profession,
in the fight
against the excessive use of alcohol,
in the efforts to improve the care of prisoners and the insane,
in the multiform endeavors, never before so numerous, to give larger opportunities to the underprivileged, and
in some of the many programs for the thorough reconstruction of society.
Oh... forgot you Proving... I wasn't referring to what he said... on the surface, it's fine to have a point of view... whether I agree with it or not... but when you are A)
in a position of influence and B) spending money to fight the opposing view... and it's to stop two people who love each other from wedding
in the eyes of their Lord, then it is hate... if your ignorance allows you to think my comments are stupid... so be it... and one last point about
slavery... whether it was Democrats or Republicans who supported, or fought
against slavery... many justified
slavery because of their perverted interpretation of the bible... most people can't tell a simple story from one person to the next... but so many foolish Christians think they know exactly what the bible is saying w / o any doubt... forget the fact that it's been translated and passed for 1000s of years... yup you must be right that God is
against two people loving each other... He must have made a mistake with those folks huh?
It was through emailing him about this song that he introduced me to Stop the Traffick — the campaign
against human trafficking for
slavery, primarily
in the sex industry, but
in other areas too.
God is obviously
against slavery as we historically know it
in America — people captured and treated inhumanely.
They have empowered black people to stand up
against slavery and prejudice
in this country.
In the past the Church as such took a stand
against slavery and felt called upon to speak out
against child labor even when such speaking hurt profits.
In other words, this text is not about how to go to heaven when you die, but rather about how to go from slavery to death in this world as we war against others (Ephesians 2:1 - 3), to unity and peace with others as we live in the family of God (Ephesians 2:11 - 22
In other words, this text is not about how to go to heaven when you die, but rather about how to go from
slavery to death
in this world as we war against others (Ephesians 2:1 - 3), to unity and peace with others as we live in the family of God (Ephesians 2:11 - 22
in this world as we war
against others (Ephesians 2:1 - 3), to unity and peace with others as we live
in the family of God (Ephesians 2:11 - 22
in the family of God (Ephesians 2:11 - 22).
«Neither Peter
in his work to include Gentiles
in the church nor the abolitionists
in their campaign
against slavery argued that their experience should take precedence over Scripture,» writes Matthew.
The GOP is following the Whigs (whose brilliant beginnings are now forgotten since they sold out
against their conscience on the issues of
slavery and manifest destiny) into the dilapidated dustbin of history, and will be commemorated
in future history textbooks as the party whose decline began when they sold out to ignorance and religious extremism.
Then through all of the vicissitudes of actual life
in the ancient Near East, God made himself a people from those forebears — delivering them from
slavery in Egypt, protecting them
against their enemies, leading them through the terrors of the wilderness, entering into covenant with them, giving them his guiding presence
in the covenant law, bringing them into a land flowing with milk and honey, giving them a Davidic king to be their protector of justice
in peace and
in war, and finally taking up his own dwelling
in their temple on the Mount of Zion.
Sister Bonetti has led the fight
against human
slavery in Italy, marshaling the significant resources of Italy's Roman Catholic community.
When the matter reached the Supreme Court of the United States, Chief Justice Roger Brooke Taney, writing for a seven — man majority
against two dissenters, accepted Sandford's major contentions, not only sending Scott back into
slavery, but holding,
in effect, that he had never been free.