Still, the case
against teleological ethics may here offer this response: Granting the difference between direct and indirect applications, this yields only the familiar
distinction between «act - teleology» and «rule - teleology, «3 is problematic for the following reason:
Social practices or patterns of social cooperation can not be validated teleologically without a comparative assessment of the good and evil consequences differing possible systems of rules or norms (for instance, differing sets of rights) are likely, if adopted, to pr
Social practices or patterns of
social cooperation can not be validated teleologically without a comparative assessment of the good and evil consequences differing possible systems of rules or norms (for instance, differing sets of rights) are likely, if adopted, to pr
social cooperation can not be validated teleologically without a comparative assessment of the good and evil consequences differing possible systems of rules or norms (for instance, differing sets of rights) are likely, if adopted, to produce.