Sentences with phrase «against the bills if»

It's a presumptive knock against the Bills if they don't move up but that knock is based on, for lack of a better term, «dinosaur» thinking and, I believe, an entitlement attitude that has no reason to exist.

There is a real possibility of further Shadow Cabinet departures: Clive Lewis has left himself very little room to manoeuvre after he promised to vote against the bill if Labour's changes were not accepted, while all eyes will be on Diane Abbott after her no - show last week.

Shadow business secretary Clive Lewis has also warned that he may vote against the bill if the government doesn't accept Labour's amendments.

The SNP and Lib Dems are likely to vote against the bill if their amendments are not passed, and some Labour rebels will join them.

Not exact matches

At least two GOP Senators, Kentucky's Rand Paul and Maine's Susan Collins, are expected to vote against the Graham - Cassidy bill to repeal Obamacare if it comes to the floor.

Taking a page from laws creating sanctuary cities for illegal immigrants, a group of lawmakers have submitted a bill that bans California law enforcement from working with federal authorities if they attempt to take action against marijuana grow facilities or dispensaries that operate legally under state law.

When asked if he might include assurances that the bill wouldn't be used to discriminate against LGBT people, such as Indiana is now considering, he said no way.

What's more, if a customer skipped out on its bills, 50 % of the bad debt was charged against the agent's commissions.

«If Congress passed this bill that the American Bankers Association wants, how many community bank mortgages would be eligible for QM that aren't currently eligible... and how does that stack up against the number of mortgages held by Well Fargo, Citibank, JPMorgan and the other giants that would become eligible under this change in the rules?»

If Republicans are able to get a veto - proof majority to back some kind of bill limiting Trump's authority to issue tariffs, it would echo the time when Republicans forced Trump to impose sanctions on Russia last August and locked old sanctions against the country into law instead of leaving them as executive orders that Trump could unilaterally rescind.

She is against a Louisiana state bill, HB 727, which has been approved in committee and if passed, would considerably strengthen penalties against pipeline protesters and landowners, like herself, who consider standing in a pipeline company's way.

If an unpaid insurance premium is among your overdue bills, check to see whether your state's insurance regulators have mandated extensions for payment, waivers against late fees or other temporary steps — as Texas and Florida did, for example, shortly after Harvey and Irma, respectively.

Other similar things might be investing in supermarkets and «consumer staples» (because if your weekly shopping basket inflates, their shares and divis probably will too) or investing in healthcare as a hedge against future healthcare costs inflating or investing in utilities as a hedge against utilities bills rising (I've yet to buy any but I quite like the idea of owning enough ~ 7 % yielding Centrica for the divis to cover the gas and electricity bills) or investing in travel and tourism companies as a hedge against holiday costs inflating.

If any PC members were to vote against a government bill, it may fail.

If VU's footing the bill & providing the space, then they have every right to refuse groups the right to discriminate against gays.

Its amazing how we argue against something deemed to help our citizens, yet if a gun control bill was up for debate people would be in arms (pun intended) about their right to own guns.

As for your seriously off base torture comparison, if we saw a drastic increase in violent crimes, and there was a public outcry for harsher punishments to try and serve as a deterrent, and the Bill was drafted, made open to the public, and the solid majority of the population didn't turn against it with protests, signatures, and contacting their representatives; maybe a torture law could make it (though it would never get past the Supreme Court as the Consttution is now, but we'll let that slide as a hypothetical).

Also, if they want to talk about this at the pulpit which many have done (even non-Catholic churches) then they should be paying taxes as they are now trying to indoctrinate their members to be against the Healthcare Bill.

Then, when the later bill failed in the House of Representatives and the conservative backlash became too severe, Rubio said he would have voted against the reform bill if he had to do it over again.

In the ensuing international backlash against the bill, Lively claimed that he did not support the death penalty for hom.ose.xuality but that if the «offending sections» were modified, the proposed law criminalizing hom.ose.xuality «would be an encouraging step in the right direction.»

Maybe if the Catholics just kept their mouths shut, didn't protest against gay marriage, didn't protest against Obama's health insurance bill, didn't protest against women's rights, and didn't try to tell everyone how wrong they are, maybe everyone wouldn't hate them so much.

Nevertheless, for all his artful linguistic deconstruction, Amar has no effective answer for the most obvious question of all: If in fact the framers of the Amendment intended to apply the Bill of Rights against the states, why didn't any of them say so?

Just because people are against the law that president Obama and the Democrats put in - place doesn't mean they're not for reform... they may just be against the particular mandate in the law and for the majority of the rest of the bill... the statement «if they're against the law in place, then they're against health care reform or against health care for those that don't have it» is a truly ignorant statement...

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

If that seems a little hysterical, consider The Catholic Herald's account of an interview given by Ed Balls on the Today programme, a few hours before the House of Commons passed, by 268 votes to 177, its Sex Education Bill (against which, Catholics should note, the Tories voted):

If you can't find your groove against the 2017 Giants & Bills defenses, then it is fair to ask when are you going to, if at all this seasoIf you can't find your groove against the 2017 Giants & Bills defenses, then it is fair to ask when are you going to, if at all this seasoif at all this season?

To keep the momentum going and to try and raise more money for Leukemia research and the Chuckstrong charity, one of the Colts Cheerleaders, Megan M., has pledged to shave her head if the Colts raise $ 10,000 by their November 25th game against the Bills.

Outdone Legendary courtroom orator William Jennings Bryan, by lawyer Bill Diehl, who in defending Charlotte Hornets owner George Shinn against charges that Shinn had sexually assaulted a woman, argued that the alleged oral sex was consensual, saying, «If she ain't bitin», she ain't fightin».»

If the Bills are going to have any hope of knocking the Patriots from the top of the division, Ryan CAN NOT be afraid to send heat after Brady just like he did against Luck.

The sacks part of that might be doable if Billings can do a good job of holding up against the run well.

But if the Buffalo Bills come away with a victory, it'll be a road game for the Titans against the Pittsburgh Steelers.

The wind factor is another negative for the Bills offense if McCoy isn't his usual self: They'll be forced to throw in adverse passing conditions with subpar receivers against the league's best pass defense.

Honorable mention: I already awarded Ezekiel Ansah with Hoss Of The Week honors for Week 6, but I would be remiss if I didn't mention Rob Ninkovich and the outstanding day he had rushing the passer against the division rival Buffalo Bills on Sunday.

Villanova led the nation in scoring (86.6 points), made an NCAA record 454 3 - pointers and set a Final Four single - game record with 18 triples against Kansas, after which coach Bill Self said «They'd be hard for anybody to deal with if they shoot the ball like that.»

In defence, Laurens De Bock will likely make his Leeds debut against Millwall, and if he's as an experienced defender as the he's been billed, he should be able to handle the attack from Millwall's McLaughlin and Wallace, who made mincemeat of Anita in the reverse fixture.

If Russia are to live up to their billing as bookmakers» favourites and win against Wales, they would do well to replicate... [Read more...]

This could result in Catholic ministers and MPs voting against the three specific measures but being whipped to accept the bill as a whole if a majority in the Commons votes for the reforms.

It's unclear if H. Ross Perot would have run against Reagan in 1992, and it's unknown if Bill Clinton would have been able to beat him.

Bill Samuels formally kicked off his LG campaign this morning, pledging to fight in a Democratic primary battle against the running mate of presumptive gubernatorial contender, AG Andrew Cuomo, if necessary.

If «justice» is a one way street that protects only the victims of crime, so they can have their day in court, then the entire Bill of Rights and it's protections against the government, should fall as well.

For the sake of consistency, it would be grand if you would apply your absolutist approach to all the other Amendments contained in the Bill of Rights — especially those discussing freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom from unreasonable search and seizure, freedom from self - incrimination, the right to legal counsel, due process, and the right to confront witnesses against you.

If we decide not to recommend a bill of rights we will equally want to explain our reasons for arriving at that conclusion though we may still want to make some observations about such a bill against the possibility that the government nevertheless decides to introduce one.

«The numbers are against us and if we face repeated defeats when the withdrawal bill returns to the Commons, the only alternative will be to kick over the table and trigger a vote of no confidence in the Prime Minister, which will likely lead to another general election.

If this Bill is passed it will directly go against the founding principles of the Social Liberal Forum; by doing great damage to social justice.

The County Legislature's Rules Committee on Monday unanimously approved a bill that would disqualify bidders for county work if they've boycotted or divested from Israeli businesses or supported sanctions against Israel — known as the «BDS movement.»

«If I reviewed the health care bill and thought it was bad for our citizens, I would file my own lawsuit against it.

The congressman said Mr Trump threatened to run a candidate against him in the midterms if he did not vote «yes» on the first iteration of the bill.

NY Post is reporting a Rangel loyalist threatened to run against state Senator Bill Perkins, if he followed through with a rumored endorsement of Rangel foe, Adriano Espaillat, According to the paper: Following a Rangel endorsement rally yesterday in East... Continue reading →

Meanwhile, while saying he expects Nixon to win the Democratic primary against Cuomo in September, WFP director Bill Lipton indicated to upstate public radio on Tuesday that if she loses, his party will not look to play a spoiler role in the November elections that would help a Republican win.

«Steve McCabe (Birmingham, Selly Oak)(Lab): Given that the vast majority of the 600,000 people who will be excluded from getting a pension under the raised threshold are women, is the Secretary of State at all worried that the Bill is beginning to look as if it discriminates against women?