Costs of $ 3000 ordered
against the appellant wife.
Costs of $ 3000 were ordered
against the appellant wife.
Not exact matches
This gives rise to similar considerations as the court expressed in F. (V.J.) when the
appellant chose to place the family home in his
wife's name as protection
against creditors.
The self - represented
appellant husband argued that the motion judge was biased, erred in finding no material change in circumstances, and erred in not making an adverse inference
against the
wife for non-disclosure.
Chase Bank filed a foreclosure suit
against defendants /
appellants (a husband and
wife) and filed returns of service signed by Chase's process server who certified that he served both
appellants at the same time on the same date.