Sentences with phrase «against the best defence»

He has had a couple of good games there against schools for the blind (smaller clubs) but against good defences he will at most time one run ok and have 1 in 20 chance of scoring from it.
If you think we will win with that midfield, playing 1 up front against the best defence in the league.
Those little passes Wilshere tries to make in the box, so ridiculous to watch that shit fails, it never works against good defence.
When they come up against a good defence Atletico again or Juve they will lose.
Ramsey was our best player but he should never have played out wide especially against a good defence like Chelsea.

Not exact matches

«The American episcopate has been strong in its defence of the liberty of the Church against the attacks of the Obama administration, and a healthy majority of our bishops now think of themselves as evangelists as well as administrators.
No attempt to «reconstitute» Q has succeeded in making of it a well - arranged «handbook», although there are signs of a rough general arrangement by subjects, (Cf. T. W. Manson in The Mission and Message of Jesus, pp. 3 f.) and these subjects seem to have included those most vital for Christian evangelism, the Substance of the Christian Life, Principles of Christian Missionary Propaganda, Defence of the New Religion against Jewish Attacks, Expectation of the Judgement.
Man United's danger - man Romelu Lukaku will take most of the plaudits today, as the Belgian did well against a big West Brom defence as his side won their sixth games in their last seven.
Not being forced into the team or to play on an injury will do the kid good and he is still remarkably good in tight situations and being able to pivot defence into attack which is something we sometimes struggle to do against high press teams.
Tight interplay, great movement, four goals against one of the best organised defences in the country and the Ox seems to have found his position.
To be fair to AW / SB Giroud looked a good call against a towering Watford defence but as soon as AW / SB sussed out Watford's gameplan - they should have switched it.
We'll need pace against Barcelona, because the NSM combo, despite being sublime in attack is not very well known for helping in defence.
Walcott have good off ball movement and finishing is good and he scores against big team.but he lacks other aspects of the game.our left side of defence is covered.right side also with Berlin and ox, but don't know why our back 3 sometimes look shaky.
One of the other reasons we lost I believe was because we didn't play our best players of those who were available and played a midfielder in defence who hasn't played there before against the best team in England, yeah of course that doesn't mean we would have won.
Because too many times I have seen Arsenal get stuck in the opposition box against tight abdurate defence for long spells where the striker is so tightly mark that his role is reduce to holding the ball up and operating in tight spaces with good close control.
I get what you're saying I really do and maybe just maybe with a little luck we could have got a positive result but firstly my argument is why would you pay # 50m for a striker and not play him and why would you play someone in defence that's never played there before against the best team in England, secondly we have had referee decisions go our way many times but that's just how it goes.
OG may well have scored 20 goals had he played 35 matches last season, but he has fluffed a lot of chances against tight defences.
I think Adebayor will have to score more than one to stop Mauricio Pochettino's men and I can't see that happening, not against England's best defence.
If Arsene Wenger and his assistants decide against adjusting their tactics to get the best out of their marquee summer signing by letting him run with the ball at defences, Lacazette needs to take the initiative by training and watching game film to learn how to thrive in Arsenal's system and in English football in general.
But if that narrative is going to be used we can also say Foles scored 4tds against a bad defence as well.
Let's see how Theo does on his own against a well drilled, experienced and not overly offensive defence..
Yeah absolutely right.We must play with a 442 but need a Top Quality DFM.Zhaka can not retain his place in the side any longer.How bad must he continue to play before he is dropped?Play AMN.The boy looks a very good prospect and deserves a chance.Ramsey continues to prove he is not anywhere near Jacks class and offers us nothing against a defence that sits and invites us on.
He looked good, against a bad cowboys defence Foles looked worse.
Brazil defender David Luiz has headed his side in front against Austria in their friendly.David Luiz has scored for Brazil in Austria, but should the Austrian defence have done better?
He does a good job in attack and defence so for me a full 90 mins against Norwich for Joel is a no brainier.
That pass with the outside of his boot after coming on against Sunderland on Wednesday was something very few players would even consider, let alone be able to pull off and with that sort of thing as well as his dribbling and vision, Rosicky can unlock the most stubborn of defences.
Arsenal should not expect it be attack against defence though, because in the first leg at home the Saints were the better side and created a lot of chances, so we must be ready.
Arsenal are now tied with Man City, Spurs, Crystal Palace and Watford for least goals conceded and when you consider how we started and also had two players sent off against Chelsea, that suggests to me that as well as being a great keeper, Cech's influence is starting to spread through the team, especially the defence.
lst season at stamford bridge, was the first time i saw that 4 -1-4-1 formation being used, and for some weird reason i feel a very strange negative vibe and well all know the outcome.the manager has come back with this formation and its not yielding result, but he still sticks with it.i do nt know much about formations dear friends, but if you are playing a slow dm in arteta and a very very slow cb, then you are toast against quality teams with sound tactics.wen playing wellbeck as a lone striker, i think 4 -2-3-1, will work better, but if we have a big player like oliver (boooos), thn we can try the 4 -1-4-1, thingy cos he can hold the ball for our midfielders to run in.but on the overall, shame on wenger for not giving our defence a good cover DM.NO BODY PLAYS A SLOW DM / CB AND EXPECT TO B REGARDED AS CHAMPIONSHIP MATERIAL.IT HURTS GUYS, REALLY HURTS.
Best formation i ve ever seen, actually with Flamini in our team, our chances are bigger by 50 %, he scored against strongest defence in europe against Spuds, he will score against poor side like Bayern, ALL HAIL FLAMINI
Better to stop a good attacking team and go for a draw or tight win than to try and outscore a team already with soild defence like we did against Chelsea and Man City.
Arsenal have done it again by putting all thier backs on coquelin's shoulder and now he gets injured who will replace him?flamini «can't pass the ball and leaves arsenal open», arteta «no chance and was one of main reasons arsenal drew 3 - 3 against andrelecht» and the other candidate wilshere «bullshit he can't defend properly and might as well leave the club» I would prefer Christoph Kramer who is tall, mobile and will provide cover for our defence and in the recent match against Australia he came on as a substitute and provided the basic cover Germany needed.
But the German and his partner in central defence Laurent Koscielny might well have a tougher task on their hands tonight against Manchester United.
Against Che I think that would be good because if you could by - pass the midfield, I think you could really get at that Che defence.
Kane will be looking to continue his goal scoring form for the year against 2015's best defence, Arsenal.
It meant that Arsenal not only missed out on having a well recognised central defender against Liverpool, but that the Gunners were also largely unprepared in defence against Leicester as well.
IMO, we would have won earlier if Giroud had started the game, against parked defences, no one is as good as Giroud....
The line up will have a pretty comical defence but you still expect us to do well considering it's a weaker team at home we're playing against.
Interestingly he has played as a left midfielder as well in the centre of defence, and could well relish a role in the 3 -4-2-1 formation which Wenger tried out on Monday night against Middlesbrough.
Look gentlemen this WAS an extremely well written and well researched article and has to rank as one of the best Ive read in many a long year, Howvever when all of the «in depth analysis» has been done it really boils down to two points and two points only, 1) Our strikers (namely Walcott, Giroud, Welbeck and Cambel) just did nt score enough goals when it really mattered, 2) our defence made too many mistakes that allowed too many goals to be scored against us when it mattered.
Our team all seem to be hitting top form at present, and there is no doubt in my mind that we could possibly fail to score in the derby this week, and our defence has only conceded once in our last four, and will be well up for getting a clean sheet against our rivals.
But We would have been better just bringing in cavalho as our defence is a train wreck in the making against top teams
Well our next game is against Hull City at home and should be mainly about us trying to break down a dogged defence, so perhaps the attacking threat of Chamberlain will be a bigger weapon than the passing and work rate of the Egyptian, who might not be in the best frame of mind after losing the AFCON final to Cameroon despite opening the scoring himself.
Problem is wenger and bould have no idea how to teach team to press... It's shocking managerial failure plus against well organised defences giroud offers minimal threat on the ground..
Paulista looks the business villareal had a mean defence and he was at the heart of it lets hope he makes his debut the same time as i make my first visit to the emirates against villa next week live in ireland so hopeing for a good exciting game with an arsenal win COYG
It's a good question Krish, and you'd expect to have heard those same people coming out in defence of our results against the people who want beautiful football.
He had to marshal a makeshift back four in their European qualifier against Switzerland last night, with young Chelsea midfielder Nathaniel Chalobah as his partner in central defence and Chambers did it well.
The defence was all over the place at times, against a better team we could have conceded 3 goals with ease, don't confuse their lack of ability for our quality.
If you have 20m to spend add another 12 and get Mustafi that should be your only concern... Also Lacazette just scored a hat trick today albeit against Nancy not really the best defence out there but worth mentioning that the movements were really those of a poacher, a striker always looking to go forward with an eye towards the goal at all time!!
These teams have good defences and often play counter attack football against us.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z