Students have also asked courts to strike down barriers to choice, such as a lawsuit
against the charter school cap in Massachusetts.
Not exact matches
Citing stances the Senators have taken detrimental to the cause of working people, the flyers highlight: Protecting a failed tax system that favors the privileged at the expense of working people; increasing the tax on health insurance; siding with big corporations and
against teachers and students to pass a
Charter School Bill - with no real reform; creating a new Tier V pension; and attacking education by supporting an irresponsible property tax
cap.
If
charter schools were having no impact on student achievement, if such
schools were merely selecting better students, then it would be an easy choice to vote
against the
charter cap increase.
If
charter schools were discriminating
against English language learners and special education students, many voters would likewise find it easy to oppose the
charter cap increase.
The question was defeated with 62 % voting
against the measure and 38 % voting in favor of lifting the
cap and allowing more
charter schools in Massachusetts.
«Our organization and other organizations that we're working with are not
against lifting the
charter -
school cap.
On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 (Election Day 2016), Massachusetts voters will have to opportunity to cast their vote in favor or
against Question 2, a referendum that would lift the
cap on the number of
charter schools allowed in Massachusetts.
The diversion of millions of dollars from traditional public
schools is one reason the New England Conference of the NAACP and the Massachusetts Lawyer's Committee filed a motion
against the effort to lift the
cap on the number of
charter schools in Massachusetts.
The article is centered around secretary of education John King who speaks
against «arbitrary»
caps on
charter schools and in support of greater state accountability.