and put them in as competitors in my ranking system,
against my current portfolio.
Okay, so now I have two things ready to go: I have the full list of tickers that I will compare
against my current portfolio.
Not exact matches
Our core fixed - income
portfolios seek to preserve capital, provide
current income and serve as ballast
against stock market volatility.
The
portfolio office would solicit proposals for both and weigh them
against each other with the
current processes applying (i.e. a community review board, then Superintendent recommendation and finally Board approval).
How does it stack up
against the Touch and Glo models in the company's
current product
portfolio?
Even though there has been a lot of commentary around
current high stock valuations
against lackluster earnings growth for the S&P 500, it is «neither practical or precise» for an investor to use this as a basis for lowering their exposure to stocks or selling their
portfolio.
That's probably correct, though for my own investing it might not be as accurate, because I rank
current positions
against challengers — my
current positions have to justify their existence to stay in the
portfolio.
Then, last week, after losing out on a huge bidding war for Nortel's patent
portfolio, Google published a blog post lamenting the
current state of the US patent system, and accused its competitors of conspiring
against Google and leveraging a broken and ineffective patent system to their advantage.