Sentences with phrase «against the divorce court»

In a contested divorce one spouse will be the plaintiff — the spouse that initiates the divorce and states legal grounds for doing so while the other will be the defendant — the spouse that has the option to either agree or defend against the divorce court.

Not exact matches

The evidence could be used against him for the courts to grant a divorce from Arsenal fc??? For «Unreasonable Behaviour»

Actor Terrence Howard has stepped up his ugly divorce battle by asking a court to grant a restraining order against his estranged wife.The Iron Man...

My sister and her husband are separated and her husband has filed a case for divorce and child custody against my sister in Indian family court...

Next, the court pointed out that the wife herself had chosen Ontario as the proper jurisdiction when she commenced the divorce application and claimed custody in that province, and had raised the issue of jurisdiction only after the criminal charges against the father were withdrawn in July of 2010.

It was Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 that provided a mechanism for someone who has not remarried or entered into a civil partnership to bring a claim in England and Wales against a spouse or former spouse even if a court has already made a financial order in divorce proceedings in another jurisdiction.

The representative of the appellant argues that the judgment of the original court which acknowledged the jurisdiction of the Japanese court in an action of the appellee who is a Japanese national claiming divorce in the present case against the appellant who has a nationality of the German Democratic Republic is against the law.

Mark will be part of an interactive focus group on the second day of this three - day event, in a session that will focus on the enforcement of divorce court orders against foreign trust and corporate structures, within Europe and offshore.

The English courts do not open their doors to just anyone who wishes to take advantage of our divorce laws, but rather requires spouses to demonstrate a real connection to this country, and are constantly on guard against «forum shopping».

Collaborative divorce is a form of dispute resolution where the family agrees from the very beginning that they are not going to use attorneys to fight against one another in court.

When the Superior Court has jurisdiction over the custody and maintenance of the minor children of parents divorced, separated or living separate, and such children are natives of this State, or have resided five years within its limits, they shall not be removed out of its jurisdiction against their own consent, if of suitable age to signify the same, nor while under that age without the consent of both parents, unless the court, upon cause shown, shall otherwise oCourt has jurisdiction over the custody and maintenance of the minor children of parents divorced, separated or living separate, and such children are natives of this State, or have resided five years within its limits, they shall not be removed out of its jurisdiction against their own consent, if of suitable age to signify the same, nor while under that age without the consent of both parents, unless the court, upon cause shown, shall otherwise ocourt, upon cause shown, shall otherwise order.

It creates a statutory privilege (like the attorney - client privilege) that, except under limited circumstances, ensures that what is said during a collaborative divorce process can not be used against a spouse in court.

A court order dismissing your spouse's claims against your estate upon death may not prevent a claim if you continue to live together If a person lives with their ex-spouse after they divorce, can he / she make a claim against their...

It is not final — a Court order as part of a divorce including the dismissal of future claims ensures that neither party can bring a claim against the other later, whereas a separation agreement alone will not.

When her husband failed to appear in court, his dissipation was soon discovered, and she then filed a legal malpractice claim against her first and second lawyers, claiming that they breached their duties of care in failing to obtain an order from the divorce court freezing the couple's bank accounts.

The petition was issued against a husband who then challenged the divorce being processed in England and Wales on the basis that he abandoned his domicile of origin in Wales and instead acquired a domicile of choice in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and therefore the Courts of England and Wales had no jurisdiction to entertain the divorce petition.

Ask any innocent person who has been deposed, or subpoenaed to produce private documents, or required to testify in court as part of someone else's legal problems — just because you were at the wrong place at the wrong time (Currently, a friend is going through a divorce, and the husband's attorney has subpoenaed all sorts of family, friends, former employers, and ex-boyfriends of over 10 years to testify against the wife, and to produce certain documents and records.

Each of these goes against the intentions of the court, and a top divorce lawyer can help you.

Divorce has a reputation for being a long, arduous and contentious process that pits both spouses against each other in a vicious, no - holds - barred court fight to determine everything including division of assets, spousal maintenance, parenting time, and child support.

TRU CLC is not able to represent clients in certain legal areas, including family law issues or divorce, criminal cases, business and commercial law, real estate and strata matters, personal injury claims, issues arising from unionized employment, probate or administrative matters, any matters within the jurisdiction of the British Columbia Supreme Court or Court of Appeal and complaints against dentists, doctors, lawyers or TRU.

Some States Prevent Insurance Revenge With Restrictive Divorce Laws Spouses have been using insurance policies to commit abuses against their exes long enough that, in some states, the courts and state legislators are stepping in.

«During my separation and divorce, my ex-wife made false allegations against me in order to try to gain an advantage in family court by having me criminally charged.

The Supreme Court of Canada has previously said, in the context of the BC Human Rights code, that compliance with religous tenets of a faith based school is a bona fide requirement of employment for a religious school (see Caldwell et al. v. Stuart et al., [1984] 2 SCR 603 — recently cited by the BC Court of Appeal in Vancouver Rape Relief Society v. Nixon for the basis that the Vancouver Rape Relief Center could discriminate against a non-genetic female) which held that a Catholic school could dismiss an employee who had married outside of the tenets of the Catholic faith (i.e., she had married a divorced non-catholic in a civil ceremony).

It's pretty likely that if the policyholder's ability to alter a policy is ruled against in divorce court, they'll be unable to change the beneficiaries of their policy in the future without a legal challenge.

Kramer vs. Kramer is a famous movie of a divorce in The Family Courts and that vs. means versus or against, like a battle, and that's how people like Sonia Blanchette kill children.

Collaborative divorce is a form of dispute resolution where the family agrees from the very beginning that they are not going to use attorneys to fight against one another in court.

If you are committed to coming out of your divorce process a whole, healthy individual and if you want to be the best parent for your children, you should consider the benefits of therapy and weigh them against any possible downside of their notes or testimony being shared with the court and your spouse.

If your misstatement comes to light during your divorce proceedings, the court can rule against you, particularly with regard to division of assets and debts.

However, if one spouse deliberately prolongs or complicates the divorce process out of malice or a refusal to abide by orders, the court may order him to reimburse his spouse for the money she had to pay her attorney to defend against his actions.

If your spouse doesn't file any response at all, you can ask the court to enter default against him, granting your divorce and giving you the things you asked for as relief.

A court can impose sanctions against someone who improperly sells marital property during a divorce.

During a divorce case, the court may consider criminal acts committed against a spouse when determining legal issues such as child custody.

If a parent is not making child support payments that the divorce decree requires, the other parent may either initiate an independent court action against the nonpaying parent to enforce the order or seek help from the Arizona Division of Child Support Enforcement.

If the spouse can not be located, the court can require notice of the divorce published in local periodicals before entering a default against the named defendant.

In collaborative divorce, each attorney must sign papers disqualifying themselves from ever appearing in court on behalf of either of the clients against the other.

Under each fault ground for a divorce, there is a provision for when you can bring the lawsuit against your spouse to the court.

A High Court Judge warns women against dating and entering into new relationships, who are in the midst of divorce proceedings.

In Divorce Court, the children often become pawns in the parents» fighting over child support payments, and are pitted by one parent against the other to attempt to gain some advantage in the courtroom battles.

However, since your divorce agreement states your ex-husband is responsible, you would have a cause of action against him in court.

Collaborative Practice, also known as Collaborative Divorce, Collaborative Law, or Collaborative Process, is a private form of dispute resolution where the spouses agree from the beginning that they are not going to fight against one another in court.

The only way to stop your facebook page from being used against you in a divorce court is not to do it in the first place.

TOPEKA — A Kansas legislative committee heard passionate testimony Tuesday from people both for and against a bill that would require courts to order shared custody and parenting of children in most divorce cases.

However, I will say that at home, when I have the occasional constituent come to talk to me about divorce law and family law problems, without exception, the problems have been fathers feeling that they are not getting fair representation through the courts and that the whole system is stacked against fathers having access to their children.

In particular, spouses who are being divorced against their will, and who have not engaged in egregious misbehavior such as abuse, adultery, or abandonment, should be given preferential treatment by family courts.

- Americans believe the top groups discriminated against in US Courts are; The Poor, African Americans, and Divorced Fathers

The very structure of family law litigation (i.e. arguing a divorce case in court before a judge) requires partners and parents to aggressively position themselves against the other to «win» the favor of a judge.

Working against each other will pretty much land you either in hostile territory or worse, divorce court.

A litigated divorce is a complicated, adversarial legal process that involves lawyers, legal procedures, court hearings, settlement efforts, and maybe even a trial — which will pit one spouse against the other in a win - lose battle.

While no lawyer can absolutely guarantee that a court in the future will abide by the terms of a marriage contract, at least when you have an experienced family law lawyer you are maximizing the chances that your «divorce insurance» will be effective against any later attack.

Rather than two individuals pitted against one another in a battle fought primarily through letters shared between law offices or in court — one that typically lasts well in excess of a year — couples who choose to divorce through Kawartha Collaborative Practice sit at a table, work out details of an agreement, and explore the options that work best for their family.