Some businesses will require employees to sign «non-disparagement» contracts that are unlawful under federal law, and then seek to enforce the unlawful non-disparagement provisions
against the former employee working at a competing business.
Not exact matches
Subscribe to the Afternoon Brief Trending Story: Napa Winery Files Lawsuit
Against Former Employees for Allegedly Stealing Company Data A Napa Valley winery is suing three former employees for allegedly deleting confidential company information from their work - issued computers after copying the information for personal use and retaliation... Today's News: An Interview with Paul Mabray, -LS
Former Employees for Allegedly Stealing Company Data A Napa Valley winery is suing three former employees for allegedly deleting confidential company information from their work - issued computers after copying the information for personal use and retaliation... Today's News: An Interview with Paul Mabray,
Employees for Allegedly Stealing Company Data A Napa Valley winery is suing three
former employees for allegedly deleting confidential company information from their work - issued computers after copying the information for personal use and retaliation... Today's News: An Interview with Paul Mabray, -LS
former employees for allegedly deleting confidential company information from their work - issued computers after copying the information for personal use and retaliation... Today's News: An Interview with Paul Mabray,
employees for allegedly deleting confidential company information from their
work - issued computers after copying the information for personal use and retaliation... Today's News: An Interview with Paul Mabray, -LSB-...]
Goldblatt Partners LLP has commenced a proposed class action for unpaid wages (including overtime)
against Goodlife Fitness Centres Inc. on behalf of all current and
former non-managerial
employees who
worked in Goodlife's Ontario clubs since October 2014.
In October 2016, a proposed class action for unpaid wages (including overtime) was filed
against Goodlife Fitness Centres Inc. («Goodlife») on behalf of all current and
former non-managerial
employees of Goodlife who
worked for Goodlife in its Ontario clubs since October 2014.
Emily Kysel, a
former employee of the Department of Code Enforcement, has filed a suit
against her
former employer under the Americans with Disabilities Act for having been denied the ability to bring her paprika - sniffing dog to
work.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA), which protects men and women who perform substantially equal
work in the same establishment from sex - based wage discrimination; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), which protects individuals who are 40 years of age or older; Title I and Title V of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended (ADA), which prohibit employment discrimination
against qualified individuals with disabilities in the private sector, and in state and local governments; Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which prohibit discrimination
against qualified individuals with disabilities who
work in the federal government; Title II of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA), which prohibits employment discrimination based on genetic information about an applicant,
employee, or
former employee; and the Civil Rights Act of 1991, which, among other things, provides monetary damages in cases of intentional employment discrimination.
After multi-day evidentiary hearing, obtained injunction
against former employee precluding
work in restricted market, and precluding solicitation of our client's customers.
His commercial
work focuses on claims
against former employees and directors, including applications for urgent injunctive relief.
Patrick's commercial
work focuses on claims
against former employees and directors, including applications for urgent injunctive relief.