Sentences with phrase «against the injury victim»

Others can (and will) be used against the injury victim in a negative way.

Not exact matches

His victim, who is now in his 40s, is taking legal action against the Church of England for personal injury caused as a result of the abuse suffered.

Fabian Delph is suspended after his red card against the Latics, while long - term injury victim Benjamin Mendy remains sidelined.

Led in evidence by Mrs. Idowu Alakija, the State's Director of Public Prosecution (DPP), Obafunwa, who is a Consultant Pathologist to the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (LASUTH) and the former Vice-Chancellor of the Lagos State University (LASU), said the victims of the collapsed building died due to multiple injuries, traumatic asphyxia, severe blood loss, severe fracture and compression of the skull with the brain tissue, congested heart failure against the background of hypertension and accumulation of blood in the chest cavity.

The bill provides the opportunity for injunctive relief for a victim of cyberbullying, and raises the offense of «harassment» to a Class A misdemeanor if it was committed via electronic communication against a child with the intent to cause injury or suicide.

The new reforms go beyond civil claims against perpetrators, and also ease limitation periods for victims» compensation claims to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board (CICB).

Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding resvictim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding resVictim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding resvictim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding resvictim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding resvictim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding resvictim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding resvictim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding resulted.

At Moore Blatch LLP, Paula Barnes has a specialist practice advising clients, who may be elderly or the victims of clinical negligence or personal injury, undertaking continuing care claims and appeals against the NHS.

Therefore, when an auto defect causes a serious or deadly car crash, victims can file a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit against the company that is to blame.

Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was rvictim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was rVictim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was rvictim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was rvictim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed against order to provide DNA sample — Appeal allowed — Order was issued to destroy DNA sample that was taken — Trial judge erred in failing to exercise discretion not to order DNA sample — Accused was first time offender, in circumstances that resulted in serious injuries, but with no intention of causing those injuries — Accused had otherwise been exemplary citizen, and likelihood of re-offending was remote.

Many states have «dram shop» laws or statutes which allow victims to pursue liability claims against establishments that provide the alcohol to drunk drivers who are involved in accidents and cause injuries or other damage.

Depending on a person's injuries and damages, a hoverboard accident victim may be able to file a lawsuit against the hoverboard company and / or the retailer in order to pursue monetary compensation.

The victim can decide whether to take this settlement or whether to proceed with a personal injury lawsuit against the party responsible for the accident.

And while the collectibility of the $ 40 million judgment against Cerillo may be questioned (perhaps the family will never see ALL this money, though they will see some — hopefully), this case is a great example of how crime victims may seek justice through Florida civil law and damages under Florida injury and wrongful death statutes.

When someone is injured due to the negligent or intentional conduct of another person, the victim is entitled to file a Florida personal injury claim against the person or people they believe to be responsible for their injuries.

She represents the victims of car accidents and traumatic brain injuries against insurance companies and at fault drivers, helping them get the money they need to recover from their serious injuries.

In the aftermath of a catastrophic injury, such as traumatic brain injury, the victim can pursue a personal injury lawsuit against the negligent party who is responsible for causing the injuries.

As a victim, your only recourse may be to file a personal injury lawsuit against the party responsible for your injuries.

Victims can seek relief against these at - fault drivers through the use of a personal injury claim.

If a motorcycle accident is caused by road hazards, injury victims can pursue a personal injury claim against the city, county, or state agency responsible for maintaining the roads.

At Preszler Law Firm, we help pedestrian accident victims seek compensation for their physical and emotional injuries, both through legal action against the negligent driver and by pursuing benefits under your own ICBC insurance plan.

These victims are not without relief, though, as the laws in Florida give accident victims and immediate family members the right to bring a personal injury or wrongful death claim for their damages against negligent motorists who caused a car accident.

That's why many injury victims file a personal injury claim against the person who hurt them.

Lots of Depuy hip replacements claims filed by individual victims of these complications actually form part of larger class action lawsuits against the manufacturers Depuy and in which the personal injury lawyers who work for Ketchmark and McCreight, P.C. have years of experience to draw on.

Victims of such accidents have a right to file a personal injury lawsuit against the negligent parties involved.

A dedicated lawyer can help a victim with an insurance claim or personal injury lawsuit against the party responsible for causing the injuries, whether this is an individual or a business.

Injured truck accident victims and their loved ones should be aware that trucking companies often do everything in their power to defend themselves against personal injury claims.

Fortunately for injury victims, the law gives them the right to file personal injury lawsuits against parties whose careless actions caused the injury.

In addition, New York's no - fault law generally requires that motor vehicle accident victims prove they have suffered a «serious injury» in order to bring a claim against the at - fault driver for pain and suffering compensation.

However, with the new statute and the increased burden of proof on the slip and fall injury victim, the injured party will often face a hotel defense attorney all too willing to fight against their claim.

In addition to helping hold employers responsible for sloppy employee management, hiring, training, and retention, New Mexico personal injury claims against an employer often allow the injury victim to recover substantially more than claims limited to the employee.

British Columbia law allows accident victims to file a claim for personal injury against any party who caused their injuries.

The Courts hear cases in which victims claim damages against health care practitioners for injuries suffered and decide the amount of damages, if any, that should be paid.

In such cases, the victim may proceed against all of the parties whose negligence resulted in a personal injury.

If the ATV was hit by another off road vehicle, such as another TV, an SUV, or a farm vehicle that was negligently driven, then the injured victims may have legitimate reason for pursuing a personal injury claim against the other driver.

Speaker at continuing legal education seminars on personal injury topics, including Insurance Claims against Drunk Drivers, on behalf of children and on behalf of victims with traumatic brain injury.

Whether it be a Massachusetts car accident, slip and fall, or any other type of personal injury case, the injury victim must prove the following elements in order to win a negligence case against a defendant:

Attorneys at Joshua W. Glotzer, APC are experienced truck injury lawyers who have been defending the rights of truck accident victims against insurance companies and trucking industry attorneys on a day - to - day basis for decades.

When negligent ownership of a dog erupts into an injury for an innocent person, the victim with the help of a Toledo dog bite lawyer has a right to pursue damages against the owner equal to the pain and suffering their dog has inflicted.

Trucking accidents result in some of the most serious injuries and damages, and as a result it is likely that a victim will want to pursue a negligence claim against the culpable party.

But frequently a lawsuit will need to be filed against the person or company that has injured you, because we rarely have a choice: insurance companies and large corporations hardly ever offer injured victims of negligence fair compensation for their injuries.

Personal injury lawyers negotiate with insurance companies, battle opposing attorneys and face off against individuals and large corporations on behalf of injury victims and families on a daily basis.

Beyond dealing with ICBC, many Prince George accident victims may be entitled to file a personal injury lawsuit directly against a negligent driver.

Since battery and assault are considered both crimes against the state and civil offenses, as explained by FindLaw, assault victims may recover from losses in civil court with the help of Chicago injury attorneys.

I am constantly fighting for the rights of people and against legislation that benefits the insurance industry in corporate America to the detriment of injury victims and families.

We can assist victims and their families in pursuing personal injury claims against swimming pool and spa manufacturers.

Victims of accidents involving tractor - trailers can file personal injury legal cases against the individuals, the transportation company, and in some situations, their insurance coverage provider for monetary damages.

When an adult or child sustains a personal injury or dies as a result of the negligence of an individual or entity, the negligent party may be held liable for the damages suffered by the injured victim or victim's family in a negligence or wrongful death action brought against the responsible parties.

If a victim dies of injuries sustained by a defective product, the victim's immediate family members may be entitled to recover damages sustained by the family members as a result of the victim's death in a wrongful death action brought against the same defendants.

As with personal injury claims that are brought against private parties, victims of government entity negligence are entitled to compensatory damages.