Sentences with phrase «against the law there»

Not exact matches

Capitol Hill is gridlocked, so there are long odds against the federal bill becoming law, anyway.

There's no law against offering severance payments consistent with your employment policies to help cushion the blow as well.

Technically, there are laws against funding someone else's lawsuit — common - law rules that use odd names like «champerty» and «barratry.»

Last July, the European Commission opened an unprecedented investigation into the rule of law in Poland — a procedure that is started when there are concerns that a particular country is going against the EU's democratic values.

«This indicates that there is significant cooperation against much bigger targets,» Jed Shugerman, a Fordham University law professor, told Business Insider.

Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook, the most prominent openly gay executive, assailed a new Indiana law that critics say could make it legal for businesses there to discriminate against gays and lesbians.

If you had an active shooter situation, could you start stacking furniture against your office door to make it harder to get inside until law enforcement gets there?

Panama's public prosecutor against organised crime said there was no evidence so far to take action against the law firm at the center of the Panama Papers scandal, following a raid lasting 27 hours on its offices.

Meanwhile, Hong Kong's security chief, Lai Tung - kwok, said on Wednesday that until now there was no indication that Xiao had left the city against his will or that mainland public security officers had enforced law in the city.

The United States doesn't have an overarching privacy law; rather, there is a cluster of common law that protects US citizens against the invasion of privacy.

As my research shows, there are always competing voices lobbying for and against trade protection, and those preferences alone aren't enough to push a protective measure into law.

Paul has tried repeatedly to get law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, to pursue a case against Kivimaki, but says he was told that since he was a minor in Finland, there was little they could do.

And according to an article in the Journal of Conflict and Security Law by David Fidler, a professor of law at Indiana University, the current international law is «not well positioned to support responses to terrorist cyberattacks,» and there are no «strong incentives» for states to develop international law against this threat due to the relative dearth of these occurrencLaw by David Fidler, a professor of law at Indiana University, the current international law is «not well positioned to support responses to terrorist cyberattacks,» and there are no «strong incentives» for states to develop international law against this threat due to the relative dearth of these occurrenclaw at Indiana University, the current international law is «not well positioned to support responses to terrorist cyberattacks,» and there are no «strong incentives» for states to develop international law against this threat due to the relative dearth of these occurrenclaw is «not well positioned to support responses to terrorist cyberattacks,» and there are no «strong incentives» for states to develop international law against this threat due to the relative dearth of these occurrenclaw against this threat due to the relative dearth of these occurrences.

While there's technically no law against it, if you default, your lender could still choose to take legal action should they find out that you've used the money for something other than what you agreed to.

And worse, there are no laws that protect you against bitcoin losses.

The reason is because there is no end to certain religious people telling scientists that they are wrong just because some theory or law goes against that person's religion.

There is nothing in the law that says a golf club can discriminate against those that do not fit within their rules.

There is no god; therefore there is no god's law against adulThere is no god; therefore there is no god's law against adulthere is no god's law against adultery.

against such there is no law.

They often start Christian, aware that there are certain laws against sin: the 10 Commandments, and NT teachings.

If you don't believe me, then you have never tried to live or work in a Mormon - dominated area — they have no compunction whatsoever against lying or by - passing laws to get ahead at the expense of what they refer to as «gentiles» and shamelessly promote their own members (they literally keep a book of apostates and people like me who are unhireable, etc. once listed there).

Let them know that there is only one God and He is not one born of man, One savior and He took all the laws and ordinances that were against us and moved them out of the way, nailing them to His Cross (Col 2:13 - 15).

There is another important aspect of «eye for an eye» that is often overlooked: in the Bible, the law prescribes that the punishment be leveled against the offending individual by the state.

Scripture makes clear there are certain actions we can take that have NO laws against them — and it is possible to live that way.

In certain places, there are laws that forbid businesses to discriminate against people on the basis of their orientation.

Good thing a women's rights are protected under secular law or there would be many an invasive procedure done against their will.

Against these things there is no law.

There were bigoted laws created in this country prohibiting interracial marriage but it was never against natural law.

As for your seriously off base torture comparison, if we saw a drastic increase in violent crimes, and there was a public outcry for harsher punishments to try and serve as a deterrent, and the Bill was drafted, made open to the public, and the solid majority of the population didn't turn against it with protests, signatures, and contacting their representatives; maybe a torture law could make it (though it would never get past the Supreme Court as the Consttution is now, but we'll let that slide as a hypothetical).

The problem with interpreting «biblical principles» as moral absolutes without taking the mitigating circumstances into consideration is that there is no room for compassion or mercy, which leads to the commission of sins against the law of love, which transcends and surpassingly fulfills all other laws.

The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self control, and «against such things, there is no law» (Galatians 5:23).»

There is no law against greed or even general lying.

Fundamentally we may say this: there is no law against the man who truly has faith, hope and love and who genuinely loves his neighbour and can surrender himself.

In fact, I've been taught that homosexuality is just about the worst kind of sin that there is, one we ought to protest against and make laws about.

The fruit of the Holy Spirit is love... against such there is no law.

But the fruit of the spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self - control, against such there is no law.

Without regulations, they can just hold up their hands and say there weren't any laws against what they did.

When the Nazi officials on trial at Nuremberg argued in their defense that they had merely obeyed the laws of the state, public opinion quickly agreed that there ought to be a law proscribing such crimes against humanity.

Dear I am not working or aware of the laws of legal or sharia systems but as a Muslim know that cursing all that is considered holy can bring a whole lot of trouble for Muslim or not Muslim specially if there were many witnesses against you, said tobe not less than two men or four women.

And there were no child protection laws at all: the man, as head of the household, could beat his children and his wife, and if the wife was killed, well, that wasn't against the law either.

3:28, R.S.V.) The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, meekness, selfcontrol; against such there is no law.

A musician may say there is no law that music has to be beautiful, but his humanity will kick against his false belief.

Against such things there is no law.

A little thought about natural law makes clear that there is no other species than man so endowed with the possibilities of its own protection and thoughtful promulgation; no other species that can display such a reverence for life that it can fight against the dying of the light; no other that can so protect its weakest, most vulnerable members.

Then there comes again a moment when life revolts against the law that has ceased to contain the spirit which created it.

When there is a rise in the incidence of burglary, do we say it throws into question laws against burglary?

Thus it was with a grim literalness that there was fulfilled, in the life of entire cultures and not only of individual families, the alienation described by the saying of Jesus in the Gospels: «I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter - in - law against her mother - in - law; and a man's foes will be those of his own household» (Matt.10: 35 - 36).

There is a very simple difference — anti-gay people think they can control other people through law by denying them legal rights...pro - gay people understand that religious people have their rights to believe and worship freely, but not to discriminate against others via the law based on religious beliefs.

«There is never any doubt in the Bible that we are to treat others properly and New World form of slavery where the person was the property of another was against the law of God.»

On Christian ethical grounds, I would recommend that all laws making criminal offenses of acts between consenting homosexual adults be repealed and that there be no blanket job discrimination against homosexual persons of either sex; further, I contend that exclusion of homosexual persons from churches (unless they are pushed out for a reason that would apply to heterosexuals in identical fashion) is untenable.