The courts» power to award costs
against a lawyer personally is not limited to civil proceedings, but criminal also, and can sometimes be exercised against defence lawyers, though rare.
Costs
against a lawyer personally is justified only on an exceptional basis where the lawyer's acts have seriously undermined the authority of the courts or seriously interfered with the administration of justice.
1) When determining whether the imposition of costs
against a lawyer personally is warranted, a factor for consideration is whether the lawyer's clients have waived solicitor - client privilege.
«The court nevertheless recognizes that costs must not be awarded
against lawyers personally merely because they assert claims or defences that are weak or unmeritorious,» says MacKenzie, who was not involved in the Sawridge matter.
It can be seen from the Court of Appeal's decision in Galganov that courts should be reluctant to award costs
against lawyers personally.
[1] This appeal concerns the scope of the courts» power to award costs [1]
against a lawyer personally in a criminal proceeding.
Conversely, a cost award assessed
against the lawyer personally is unfair if the delay is the client's fault, but the lawyer can not say so because of solicitor - client privilege.
Not exact matches
That fall, the LSUC began a proceeding
against Felderhof's defence
lawyer, Joe Groia, alleging that he'd been guilty of professional misconduct in his defence of Felderhof by, among other things, relentlessly attacking OSC prosecutors, both professionally and
personally.
She said it was nothing
against me
personally but that she had had such a bad experience in her divorce (I was doing her real estate) that she just did not want to deal with men anymore, so she apologized and went to a female
lawyer to have her will done.
Although he wasn't
personally wronged, the court found there was no law barring
lawyer Alexandre Proulx from seeking a vexatious litigant application
against Elizabeth Balanyk, who brought many unmeritorious motions
against OLG, the court found.
Gavin MacKenzie, of MacKenzie Barristers, says that, historically, courts have been extremely cautious in awarding costs
personally against lawyers because of their duties to bring forward even unpopular cases.
The Young decision also confirms that courts must be extremely cautious in awarding costs
personally against a
lawyer, as
lawyers are often retained to bring forward unpopular causes.
In Young, the Supreme Court of Canada establishes the governing principles for when a court may award costs
personally against a
lawyer.
In June of this year, the Ontario Court of Appeal released an important decision clarifying the circumstances in which a court will award costs
personally against a
lawyer.
Similar charges led to disciplinary action
against other
lawyers under pre-Proposition 64 law which granted members of the general public standing to bring such suits without having to show that they had been
personally injured by the violation.
An English
lawyer might be surprised to learn that in Sweden a shareholder can only bring a claim
against a company officer
personally only where a crime has been committed, for example.