Sentences with phrase «against the other spouse in»

Legally, this has been established through the creation of a statutory privilege which will prevent, except in certain, limited circumstances, communications and negotiations during the collaborative process from ever being used against the other spouse in court.

Not exact matches

1 Corinthians 11:14 (Men should not have long hair) 1 Corinthians 14:34 - 35 (Women should remain silent in church) Deuteronomy 13:6 - 16 (Death penalty for Apostasy) Deuteronomy 20:10 - 14 (Attack city, kill all men, keep women, children as spoils of war) Deuteronomy 21:18 - 21 (Death penalty for a rebellious son) Deuteronomy 22:19 - 25 (Kill non - virgin / kill adulterers / rapists) Ecclesiastes 1:18 (Knowledge is bad) Exodus 21:1 - 7 (Rules for buying slaves) Exodus 35:2 (Death for working on the Sabbath) Ezekiel 9:5 - 6 (Murder women / children) Genesis 1:3,4,5,11,12,16 (God creates light, night and day, plants grow, before creating sun) Genesis 3:16 (Man shall rule over woman) Jeremiah 19:9 (Cannibalism) John 3:18 (He who believes in Jesus is saved, he that doesn't is condemned) John 5:46 - 47 (Jesus references Old Testament) Leviticus 3:1 - 17 (Procedure for animal sacrifice) Leviticus 19:19 (No mixed fabrics in clothing) Leviticus 19:27 (Don't trim hair or beard) Leviticus 19:28 (No tattoos) Leviticus 20:9 (Death for cursing father or mother) Leviticus 20:10 (Death for adultery) Leviticus 20:13 (Death for gay men) Leviticus 21:17 - 23 (Ugly people, lame, dwarfs, not welcome on altar) Leviticus 25:45 (Strangers can be bought as slaves) Luke 12:33 (Sell your possessions, and give to the poor) Luke 14:26 (You must hate your family and yourself to follow Jesus) Mark 10:11 - 12 (Leaving your spouse for another is adultery) Mark 10:21 - 22 (Sell your possessions and give to the poor) Mark 10:24 - 25 (Next to impossible for rich to get into heaven) Mark 16:15 - 16 (Those who hear the gospel and don't believe go to hell) Matthew 5:17 - 19 (Jesus says he has come to enforce the laws of the Old Testament) Matthew 6:5 - 6 (Pray in secret) Matthew 6:18 (Fast for Lent in secret) Matthew 9:12 (The healthy don't need a doctor, the sick do) Matthew 10:34 - 37 (Jesus comes with sword, turns families against each other, those that love family more than him are not worthy) Matthew 12:30 (If you're not with Jesus, you're against him) Matthew 15:4 (Death for not honouring your father and mother) Matthew 22:29 (Jesus references Old Testament) Matthew 24:37 (Jesus references Old Testament) Numbers 14:18 (Following generations blamed for the sins of previous ones) Psalms 137:9 (Violence against children) Revelation 6:13 (The stars fell to earth like figs) Revelation 21:8 (Unbelievers, among others, go to hell) 1 Timothy 2:11 - 12 (Women subordinate and must remain silent) 1 Timothy 5:8 (If you don't provide for your family, you are an infidel)

«A house divided against itself...» If you are parenting with a spouse or partner, don't get stuck in good cop / bad cop roles, where one parent is always enforcing the rules and boundaries and the other is not.Aside from causing tension in your relationship, splitting your authority like this gives your teen the message that consequences are all about the «tough» parent being, well, tough.

For purposes of the means test, the U.S. Bankruptcy Code defines current monthly income as including: «any amount paid by any entity other than the debtor (or in a joint case the debtor and the debtor's spouse), on a regular basis for the household expenses of the debtor or the debtor's dependents (and in a joint case the debtor's spouse if not otherwise a dependent)...» Benefits received under the Social Security Act, payments to victims of war crimes or crimes against humanity on account of their status as victims of such crimes, and payments to victims of international terrorism or domestic terrorism on account of their status as victims of such terrorism are excluded from the means test.

No child should ever have to suffer through the slings and arrows of a court battle — particularly one in which they see mom or dad displaying such insolent hostility toward one another, often pitting their children against the other spouse or forcing them to take sides.

Since child support can be ordered retroactively for up to 24 months in an initial child support case, the court can consider proof of child support paid by one parent to the other and typically the court will give a credit to the paying spouse for the amount of child support paid against the child support arrearage owed.

This requirement creates a safe, non-adversarial environment so that each spouse knows that the other spouse's attorney is not attempting to gather information to use against him or her later in court.

Where one spouse had an affair, committed a crime, abused the other spouse, or was otherwise at fault, the bad behavior will count against that spouse in the court's evaluation of how the property should be fairly divided.

As background, it must be noted that under the Criminal Evidence Act, the ability of married spouses to testify against each other in certain criminal matters is specifically curtailed.

«A statement or admission made in such proceedings shall not be admissible in evidence against the person making it or his spouse in proceedings for an offence other than perjury.»

In the case of an auto - bicycle accident with fatalities, the surviving spouse, children, or parents may file a wrongful death lawsuit against the driver and be entitled to burial expenses as well as other damages, as suggested by the Injury Law Group.

In some cases, spouses may become vindictive to one another, make accusations or allegations against one another or interfere with the other's access and relationship with the children.

Divorce has a reputation for being a long, arduous and contentious process that pits both spouses against each other in a vicious, no - holds - barred court fight to determine everything including division of assets, spousal maintenance, parenting time, and child support.

This is especially common in the area of family law, such as when one spouse files a charge against the lawyer of the other spouse.

Although this novel approach in Darby had no impact on the husband so long as he remained in Costa Rica, if a similar order were made against a spouse who resided within Canada and held assets in a foreign jurisdiction, it could prove to be a powerful tool in ensuring that the other spouse received their fair portion of any matrimonial assets held outside of the country.

It's worth remembering that the issues of conduct in Miller reached the House of Lords following the first instance decision of Singer J who, whilst indicating that nothing either spouse alleged against the other remotely constituted conduct of such gravity that it would be inequitable to disregard it, said that having heard this evidence he regarded himself as better able to assess the wife's claims.

50 Spouses are competent and compellable witnesses against each other in proceedings under this Act.

This very competitively priced plan provides long term protection that can help in meeting a wide variety of needs, including income for a surviving spouse and / or other loved ones, funds for paying estate taxes, funding for business continuation plans, and / or protection against the loss of a key employee or business owner.

And if your spouse happens to have been the driver, it also flies in the face of the spousal immunity priviledge that is supposed to keep spouses from being forced to testify against each other.

For example, voluntary job changes that reduce income are generally not grounds for a motion for an increase in child support against the other spouse.

In fact, in the collaborative process, the attorney is contractually barred from engaging in courtroom battles; this allows each spouse to speak openly and honestly in negotiation sessions without fear that the other party's attorney will use his or her words against him or heIn fact, in the collaborative process, the attorney is contractually barred from engaging in courtroom battles; this allows each spouse to speak openly and honestly in negotiation sessions without fear that the other party's attorney will use his or her words against him or hein the collaborative process, the attorney is contractually barred from engaging in courtroom battles; this allows each spouse to speak openly and honestly in negotiation sessions without fear that the other party's attorney will use his or her words against him or hein courtroom battles; this allows each spouse to speak openly and honestly in negotiation sessions without fear that the other party's attorney will use his or her words against him or hein negotiation sessions without fear that the other party's attorney will use his or her words against him or her.

From time to time, former spouses remarry each other, even though statistics are against them (and second marriages in general).

In a contested divorce one spouse will be the plaintiff — the spouse that initiates the divorce and states legal grounds for doing so while the other will be the defendant — the spouse that has the option to either agree or defend against the divorce court.

Another is one spouse buying out the other often by trading the equity (net value after the mortgage loan balance but not usually a real estate commission is calculated in) in the home against the value of other marital assets that the other spouse wishes to keep.

If spouses are unable to reach an agreement in the collaborative process, they can not use their collaborative attorneys to fight against each other in court.

A litigated divorce is a complicated, adversarial legal process that involves lawyers, legal procedures, court hearings, settlement efforts, and maybe even a trial — which will pit one spouse against the other in a win - lose battle.

In this Agreement, both attorneys (the attorney representing the wife and the attorney representing the husband — or the attorneys representing each partner if a same - sex couple), pledge not to bring a lawsuit against the other spouse.

«While we are in alliance with our own client, we are not aligned against the other spouse,» Brakeley said.

This requirement creates a safe, non-adversarial environment so that each spouse knows that the other spouse's attorney is not attempting to gather information to use against him or her later in court.

The real problem is how to divvy everything up in divorce, and divorcing spouses won't arrive at the best solution for their family until they collaborate on resolving their issues by working together, not against each other.