It is not impossible that Defendants may act in collusion with others within the Telecommunication or Law Enforcement Agencies to plant evidences
against petitioners in - order to force them to drop their petitions.
Petitioner failed to recover adjustments greater than the Respondents» early Part 36 offer, leading to a substantial overall costs
order against the Petitioner.
Based on a jury verdict for respondent, that court entered
judgment against petitioner for $ 100,000, and, after review in both the Florida District Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Florida, the judgment was ultimately affirmed.
Respondent Acuff - Rose Music, Inc., filed
suit against petitioners, the members of the rap music group 2 Live Crew and their record company, claiming that 2 Live Crew's song, «Pretty Woman,» infringed AcuffRose's copyright in Roy Orbison's rock ballad, «Oh, Pretty Woman.»
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP v Frohlich [2012] BPIR 169 (whether a defective statutory demand for unpaid solicitor's fees, being based on an unliquidated sum, could be cured by a later admission prior to the bankruptcy petition by the debtor that said sum was due and owing, b) whether a debtor having admitted the debt was estopped from arguing that the demand was defective
as against the petitioner who had relied to its detriment on his admission).
But does it not also encourage Respondents to avoid settlement, therefore ultimately
going against Petitioner interests?
The team acted for Filminera
Resources against petitioners claiming the client damaged the environment and that it should stop its mining operations until the alleged damage was resolved.
Whether for the purposes of a strike out application it is appropriate to determine the
facts against the Petitioners when there was expert evidence in support of the contention that their mother was unable to protect them from serious harm and they needed to be removed, at least temporarily, from home to prevent serious injury.
He awarded a cost of GHC25, 000.00
against the petitioner in the sum of GHC20, 000.00 for the first respondent, and GHC5, 000 for the second respondent, the Electoral Commission.
On Monday, the California Superior Court of Contra Costa County issued a flawed decision in Doe v. Antioch in favor of the school district defendants and
against the petitioners — a group of California teachers, parents and concerned citizens seeking to compel 13 school districts to comply with the state's -LSB-... continue]