Sentences with phrase «against the public filters»

The first is that adding a betting against the public filter definitely enhances the value of betting on American League teams during interleague play.

All of these strategies improve significantly when we apply a betting against the public filter, so we wanted to focus on contrarian home dogs and determine whether they are offering value this week.

Instead, we opted to look at very basic betting against the public filters.

As you can see, underdogs have done an exceptional job of covering the spread during the postseason, but as we begin to add our betting against the public filters, we can improve our expected returns.

Not exact matches

Sacramento also fits into a key filter of ours mentioned in this season's Betting Against the Public article, getting 10 + points on the road while receiving less than 35 % of bets.

We then utilized the «Moneyline %» filter to determine whether betting against the public had been historically profitable.

To summarize, we've found success in the NHL Playoffs betting against the public and filtering the road teams rather than home teams.

After discovering value betting against the public at the 30 % level, our goal was to layer additional filters to improve the overall ROI of our system.

When we add our «betting against the public» filter to road teams getting < 40 % of moneyline bets, the ROI excels to over 40 % and nearly +28 units won (overall record of 34 - 35).

Although it's still advantageous, bettors have to consider a variety of additional filters which we cover in our 2016 MLB Betting Against the Public report.

The first step to creating a good reverse line movement betting system is to make sure we are betting against the public, so we selected the «spread %» filter and chose to examine those receiving 40 % or less of public bets.

Before the start of every season we reveal the optimal betting percentage threshold when betting against the public while trying to exploit the newest filters that have been added to our Bet Labs software.

Although this system has been historically profitable and shows a definitive edge for betting against the public, there are a number of filters we knew could be added to easily increase our return on investment.

Based on this criterion — in addition to a handful of other filters — both teams fit our 2014 MLB Betting Against the Public betting system.

Filtering this even further and solely betting against teams receiving 80 % or more of public betting action produced a slightly less profit of +20.44 units, but the massive reduction in the number of games bet more than doubles the ROI to 9.2 % at this level.

Betting against the public has been profitable when we look at very basic filters (teams receiving less than half of all public bets), but the results as we examine increasingly lopsided bet games are quite surprising.

We then used our «spread change from open to close» filter to look at instances where a team became a bigger favorite or a smaller underdog, thus moving against the public betting percentages.

Betting against the public still works in the postseason but we need to adjust our filters to get a larger sample.