Sentences with phrase «against the respondent in»

In examining its jurisdiction with regards to the sale of the property in Portugal, the Court in Macedo conceded that it did not have the power to vest title of the property in the wife, but found that it had jurisdiction in personam over the husband and could order the husband to sell the property in Portugal, or, alternatively, the husband could pay the wife for her share of the property minus his interest in the Canadian property: Having said this, the court is satisfied that it retains jurisdiction in personam against the Respondent in this jurisdiction.

Not exact matches

The CRTC is asking respondents whether they'd be willing to pay $ 5 per month to cover increased internet usage costs for a particular online service if it didn't count against their data cap, which looks like a direct reference to a net neutrality complaint currently in front of the commission:

A sizeable minority of respondents (39 — 40 %) see bitcoin as a potential analog to physical gold, both as a safe haven and a hedge against mistakes in central bank monetary policy.

95 percent of respondents told us the government could be more effective in protecting consumers against identity theft in a recent CreditDonkey.com survey.

Some hope was offered in a more sophisticated poll commissioned by Christian Action Research and Education, which invited respondents to consider five arguments against assisted suicide to see if these changed their views.

However, Rangiah J rejected the «proposition that the mere commencement of an appeal against an order imposing apecuniary penalty is, in the absence of prejudice to the respondent, enough to warrant a stay of the order pending the appeal.»

Respondents in London related how Sadiq Al - Gharyani, Libya's Mufti who made the call for Jihad against Gaddafi in 2011 and many of his affiliates were in control of militias in Libya and giving orders from their safe homes in London and Manchester, in 2014 and into 2015.

In several waves of the survey, respondents in all existing member states were asked to say, for each of a number of prospective member states, whether they would be in favour or against that country «becoming part of the European Union in the future»In several waves of the survey, respondents in all existing member states were asked to say, for each of a number of prospective member states, whether they would be in favour or against that country «becoming part of the European Union in the future»in all existing member states were asked to say, for each of a number of prospective member states, whether they would be in favour or against that country «becoming part of the European Union in the future»in favour or against that country «becoming part of the European Union in the future»in the future».

I share the view expressed by objective and reasonable members of the public that because the government was the 1st defendant / respondent against whom the Supreme Court made declarations of unconstitutional conduct in paying the judgment debt to Alfred Agbesi Woyome, the government has been pretending for purely political reasons at each turn to take steps to enforce the judgment and orders of the court only to deliberately abort them.

«Though the applicant fervently denied her involvement in criminal activities, it is her world against that of the respondent.

He is praying for the order of court to direct the respondents to immediately charge him to court if there is any case against him in accordance with the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Respondents were asked to rate «a pact with UKIP that avoids the two parties standing against each other in marginal seats» on a scale of -5 to +5 (where +5 equalled a «very positive impact» and -5 equalled a «very bad impact».)

«All other averments relating to fraudulent activities against the applicant remain largely in the realm of imagination of the respondent and unproved as there is no such document before the court.

The PPP took the case to court seeking «an order directed against the 1st respondent in her capacity as returning officer for presidential elections to grant the applicant the opportunity to amend and alter the one anomaly found in his nomination papers as well as accept his nomination papers as amended or altered to enable him contest as a presidential candidate for the 7th December 2016 elections.»

Read the previous press release, «Full judgement published in Richmond Catholic schools judicial review»: http://humanism.org.uk/2012/12/14/full-judgement-published-in-richmond-catholic-schools-judicial-review/ Read the previous press release, «Vince Cable accuses Michael Gove's officials of breaking Coalition Agreement on «faith» school admissions»: http://www.humanism.org.uk/news/view/1150 A survey by the Accord Coalition published on 12 November found that 73 % of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that «state funded schools should not be allowed to select or discriminate against prospective pupils on religious grounds in their admissions policy», while only 18 % disagreed.

The Court was therefore able to accept that the barrier raised against others by a veil concealing the face was perceived by the respondent State as breaching the right of others to live in a space of socialisation which made living together easier.

The deviation between the proportion of BES respondents saying they voted Conservative and the actual proportion of voters who did is highest in strong Conservative areas where we would expect the least social pressure against voting Conservative.

In the Matter of the Application of Dennis J. Malone, Petitioner (s), # 1799/2013 - against - The Rockland County Board of Elections and Louis C. Babcock and Kristen Zebrowski Stavisky, as Commissioners and Wayne T. Ballard and «John Doe» Respondent (s), there was extensive testimony about the roles played by Highway Department employees in collecting absentee ballots for the Highway Superintendent racIn the Matter of the Application of Dennis J. Malone, Petitioner (s), # 1799/2013 - against - The Rockland County Board of Elections and Louis C. Babcock and Kristen Zebrowski Stavisky, as Commissioners and Wayne T. Ballard and «John Doe» Respondent (s), there was extensive testimony about the roles played by Highway Department employees in collecting absentee ballots for the Highway Superintendent racin collecting absentee ballots for the Highway Superintendent race.

Respondents in this year's survey pointed to five main causes of the field's less than favorable reputation: drug and product recalls such as the withdrawal of Avandia; safety issues such as the discovery of problems with raw material from China used in medical products; scandals, including evidence that pharmaceutical companies have failed to release data from trials whose results cast doubts on their drugs» safety and efficacy; lawsuits brought against companies that failed to warn patients of problems with their products; and ethical issues such as kickbacks for physicians promoting specific medications.

The report also showed that 66.7 % of respondents feel pressure to marry against their will, especially in first - tier cities.

In addition to this, more than 52 per cent of respondents said that the Department for Education has not provided enough information and support on using technology to safeguard children against the issues covered by Prevent duty.

For example, when vouchers were offered as a reform strategy directly against «doing what it takes to put a fully qualified teacher in every classroom,» 84 percent of respondents voted for teacher quality in contrast with 17 percent who voted for vouchers.

65 % or respondents said that in the past they have decided against buying a textbook because it was too expensive.

It's true that a majority of respondents in the Winter 2010 Kindle Nation Citizen Survey is ready to take a stand against anticipated increases in Kindle Store ebook prices above the $ 9.99 figure that Amazon has associated with bestsellers and new releases since the Kindle's launch over two years ago, but inside the numbers are some indications of flexibility:

1,027 survey respondents answered the question «How successful do you feel the government is in protecting against identity theft?»)

95 percent of respondents told us the government could be more effective in protecting consumers against identity theft in a recent CreditDonkey.com survey.

In general, we haven't found very convincing survey evidence for or against the claim, but there is one survey that found «A total of 64 % of survey respondents agree with the statement, «farmers and food companies put their own profits ahead of treating farm animal humanely.

This D.C. law provides that if, after a hearing, the judicial officer finds that there is good cause to believe the respondent has committed or threatened to commit a criminal offense against the petitioner or against petitioner's animal or an animal in petitioner's household, the judicial officer may issue a protection order that directs the care, custody, or control of a domestic animal that belongs to petitioner or respondent or lives in his or her household.

South Carolina now allows a judge to issue a protective order that prohibits the harm or harassment against any pet animal owned, possessed, kept, or held by the petitioner; any family or household member designated in the order; or the respondent if the petitioner has a demonstrated interest in the pet animal.The law also allows the judge to issue a protective order that provides for temporary possession of the personal property, including pet animals, of the parties and order assistance from law enforcement officers in removing personal property of the petitioner if the respondent's eviction has not been ordered.

So in a 2015 poll, they broke out the question a little to It then asks respondents which areas they would like science and innovation to prioritize over the next 15 years, with areas such as job creation, health and medical care, energy supply, education and skills, and the fight against climate change among the issues they are asked to consider.

Given allegations, * already public *, against staff members, for a high - profile case, most VP Research would have an inquiry committee formed within a few days, either to clear the respondents quickly or show serious diligence in following up.

Despite the recent accusations of fraud levied against climate scientists, respondents continue to place a high level of trust in scientists as sources of climate change information.

Pursuant to Clean Air Act § 307 (b)(1), 42 U.S.C. § 7607 (b)(1), Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and D.C. Circuit Rule 15, Air Alliance Houston, California Communities Against Toxics, Environmental Defense Fund, Environmental Integrity Project, Hoosier Environmental Council, Louisiana Bucket Brigade, Natural Resources Defense Council, Ohio Citizen Action, and Sierra Club (collectively, «Petitioners») hereby petition this Court for review of the 2 final action taken by Respondents U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Administrator Scott Pruitt in the attached memorandum from William L. Wehrum, dated January 25, 2018 (Attachment 1), and in the Federal Register notice published at 83 Fed.

Legislation: The appellant is a regulator in Quebec that was pursuing an ethics inquiry against a claims adjuster working for the respondent.

Syncrude and Mr. Hammond brought an action against the Respondent for damages, and Syncrude applied to the court for a preliminary determination as to whether Syncrude was subrogated to Mr. Hammond's right of recovery in respect of income benefits paid by Syncrude to him, notwithstanding the provisions of s. 626.1.

«In the absence of a case to answer [a respondent] is entitled to have the application against him dismissed without more» (Richards LJ in Karoonian v CMECIn the absence of a case to answer [a respondent] is entitled to have the application against him dismissed without more» (Richards LJ in Karoonian v CMECin Karoonian v CMEC).

In Mubarak v Mubarak [2001] 1 FLR 698, [2000] All ER (D) 2302 the first post-Human Rights Act 1998 case on this jurisdiction (and see «Enforcement matters», David Burrows, 159 NLJ 7368, p 653), Brooke LJ emphasised the importance that the respondent, who faces what amounts to a criminal charge (see Engel and Others v The Netherlands (No 1)(1979) 1 EHRR 647), should know the case against him or her (ie McFarlane LJ's list: (a) and (b)-RRB-: «In Newman v Modern Bookbinders Ltd [2000] 2 All ER 814, [2000] 1 WLR 2559 judgment was given in [a case which is] far removed from the presenIn Mubarak v Mubarak [2001] 1 FLR 698, [2000] All ER (D) 2302 the first post-Human Rights Act 1998 case on this jurisdiction (and see «Enforcement matters», David Burrows, 159 NLJ 7368, p 653), Brooke LJ emphasised the importance that the respondent, who faces what amounts to a criminal charge (see Engel and Others v The Netherlands (No 1)(1979) 1 EHRR 647), should know the case against him or her (ie McFarlane LJ's list: (a) and (b)-RRB-: «In Newman v Modern Bookbinders Ltd [2000] 2 All ER 814, [2000] 1 WLR 2559 judgment was given in [a case which is] far removed from the presenIn Newman v Modern Bookbinders Ltd [2000] 2 All ER 814, [2000] 1 WLR 2559 judgment was given in [a case which is] far removed from the presenin [a case which is] far removed from the present.

Acting for corporate and individual respondents against whom office - holders in a major offshore liquidation seek orders for examination and disclosure under s. 236 of the Insolvency Act 1986.

A violation of a protective order will result in criminal charges against the respondent.

AND IN THE MATTER OF a complaint filed under section 32 (1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act by Mr. K S. Bhinder against Canadian National Railway Company BETWEEN K. S. BHINDER and THE CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION Appellants AND: CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY Respondents

Kleanthous v Paphitis [2011] EWHC 2287 Appeared on behalf of three respondents at the hearing of an application brought by a minority shareholder in the Ryman Group to continue derivative proceedings against Theo Paphitis and others.

In a civil application, the applicant requests the Court determine a point of law against the respondent.

Since the Chambers Judge's order «would seem to prevent the Province from pursuing all enforcement remedies against [the Respondent], regardless of whether they relate to a specific court proceeding», the Court of Appeal agreed the order inappropriately restrained the lawful conduct of a government official and was, therefore, in the nature of an injunction against the Crown.

The Supreme Court has unanimously allowed an appeal, in a case that required the court to consider whether a claim to damages against the UK Motor Insurers» Bureau was to be determined in accordance with English or Greek law, where the respondent had been injured by an uninsured driver while on holiday in Greece.

The respondent also has a right to know the allegations that have been made against him or her and to respond in full unless there are genuine concerns that doing so would prejudice the investigation.

The respondent brought an action in Ontario against Dr. Lu, three Chinese corporations and a British Virgin Island corporation (hereafter the «appellants») for breach of confidence, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, conspiracy, unjust enrichment and / or unlawful interference with economic interests after discovering clones being sold in the global market.

The respondent, Conrad Black, filed six libel actions in the Ontario Superior Court against the ten appellants, who are directors, advisors and a vice-president of Hollinger International, Inc. («International»).

The argument that the respondent discriminated against her on the basis of disability, however, is advanced in the alternative with some reluctance on the applicant's part, because, notwithstanding that she has been diagnosed with Gender Identity Disorder (by psychiatrist Dr. Chris McIntosh who testified at the hearing of this matter), the applicant does not regard her gender identity as a «disability».

In 2001, the respondent's majority shareholder learned of the bylaw, and when Lorraine refused to amend it the developer brought an action in nullity against the bylaw in 2007, seeking damages and the removal of the infrastructures, as well as an action against the Municipality of Thérèse de Blainville, which implemented a plan that also changed the zoning for the respondent's lanIn 2001, the respondent's majority shareholder learned of the bylaw, and when Lorraine refused to amend it the developer brought an action in nullity against the bylaw in 2007, seeking damages and the removal of the infrastructures, as well as an action against the Municipality of Thérèse de Blainville, which implemented a plan that also changed the zoning for the respondent's lanin nullity against the bylaw in 2007, seeking damages and the removal of the infrastructures, as well as an action against the Municipality of Thérèse de Blainville, which implemented a plan that also changed the zoning for the respondent's lanin 2007, seeking damages and the removal of the infrastructures, as well as an action against the Municipality of Thérèse de Blainville, which implemented a plan that also changed the zoning for the respondent's land.

[2] In a prior decision, 2012 HRTO 350 (CanLII), 2012 HRTO 350 («decision on liability»), I found that the respondent discriminated against the applicant because of disability contrary to ss.