Sentences with phrase «against the respondents»

She was not a party to the proceedings against the respondent and no order affecting her 50 % ownership interest in the home could be made.

She abandoned potential claims in trust as against the respondent's corporate assets, but had agreed to this two years before when the issue was first discussed.

A violation of a protective order will result in criminal charges against the respondent.

[5] The motion judge granted the motion and ordered that the plaintiff's action be stayed against the respondents.

I know there have been complaints, but have they ever been resolved against the respondent?

Let us assume that the claimant («C») begins an arbitration against a respondent («R») claiming US$ 10 million.

Is physical possession of the entire file necessary and will it interfere with the solicitor's lien and the action commenced against the respondent?

The Appellant's claim against the Respondent alleged passing off with respect to «VCC» and a breach of the official marks in respect to bidding on both «VCC» and «Vancouver Community College» as keywords to direct searches toward its website, VCCollege.ca.

In D'Atri v. Gonzales, 2017 BCSC 1244, Madam Justice Young found that repeatedly breaching the terms of a separation agreement, relying upon incomplete financial disclosure in an application, forcing unnecessary applications, failing to comply with Court Orders, and making false accusations against the claimant's new partner were sufficient justification for an award of special costs against the respondent in that case.

A Motion for Default Judgment, filed by the Petitioner, which asks the court to order a default judgment against the Respondent after the 30 - day period specified in the Summons has elapsed, and he or she has not filed an Answer.

The Appellants next commence a civil action against the Respondent for misfeasance in public office, alleging that the Respondent had intentionally sworn a false ITO with intent to injure.

This case relates to whether a solicitor acting for an applicant can be found personally liable to pay the costs of the respondent following the court's refusal to grant an application to issue a witness summons against the respondent.

They gave the respondent's son formal notice to stop using their parking space, but when he continued to use it periodically the appellants applied to the Superior Court of Quebec for a permanent injunction to assert the registration of their title of ownership in the register of land rights against the respondent.

After conducting an investigation that corroborated the complaints made against the respondent, his employment was terminated.

In this proceeding, the appellants seek an injunction against the respondent.

Although glowing references risk a claim against the respondent from a third party employer if a reference is inaccurate, an objective reference highlighting that it is the company's policy only to provide objective references can help the employee to mitigate his loss.

[2] The appellant tenant commenced an action against a respondent landlord for damages after slipping and falling on the premises.

The benefits plan included a provision that Syncrude was subrogated to the employee's rights of recovery against the Respondent.

In a civil application, the applicant requests the Court determine a point of law against the respondent.

A jactitation petitioner was able to seek a decree of perpetual silence against a respondent who had boasted of a marriage which he falsely alleged had taken place between himself and the petitioner.

Civil law: The individual respondent, Larry Hrynew, and corporate respondent, Canadian American Financial Corp., were found liable of civil conspiracy against the respondent, Harish Bhasin, by the Alberta Court of Queens» Bench.

1] The Applicant, Christine McCain («the Wife») brings a Motion seeking the following interim / temporary relief from the Court in her Application against the Respondent, Michael McCain («the Husband»):

Lokhova v Sberbank (ET, December 2016) John acted for the claimant in a high value sex discrimination claim against the respondent Bank.

[2] The appellant, an Ontario resident, commenced a libel action in Ontario against the respondents and the author of the book review, Dr. Leo Cooper, claiming that the book review defames him as a scholar, has damaged his academic reputation, and has prevented him from advancing in his academic career.

Ultimately, the Court of Appeal found that the «balance of convenience» favoured granting the injunction as against the Respondents pending final determination of the underlying dispute with respect to the interpretation of the agreements.

The relative strength of the prima facie case against the respondents did not preclude the Court of Appeal from finding an arguable case for the Supreme Court to grant leave.

Holding: On a motion for sanctions against respondent opposing plaintiff's counsel for failure to convey a settlement offer, the court may after dismissing substantive claims retain jurisdiction to...

The Attorney Regulation Committee is the gatekeeper for all formal proceedings against respondent attorneys.

[1] This is an application brought by a municipal voter, Paul Magder, under s. 9 of the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M. 50 [MCIA] against the respondent, Robert Ford, the current Mayor of Toronto.

The mere fact of the Appellant's acquittal was not enough, in the circumstances of this case, to warrant a finding against the Respondents.