Not exact matches
Carlson is not alone: Susan Fowler, the
former Uber engineer who came out publicly
against her
employer alleging sexual harassment, is also working with members of the California State Assembly to pass legislation to eliminate forced arbitration, which prevented Fowler from coming forward about sexual harassment at Uber until after she quit.
Now, Levandowski is at the center of a major lawsuit his
former employer Alphabet has filed
against Uber
alleging he stole key intellectual property when he left to create Otto.
Automotive designer Henrik Fisker has filed $ 100 million civil extortion lawsuit
against former employer Aston Martin,
alleging that the automaker is trying to prevent him from displaying a new...
Automotive designer Henrik Fisker has filed $ 100 million civil extortion lawsuit
against former employer Aston Martin,
alleging that the automaker is trying to prevent him from displaying a new automobile designed by him at the Detroit Auto Show, which starts next week.
The lawsuit
against the shooter's
former employer, G4S,
alleges that it knew he was mentally unstable and threatening violence, yet they employed him as an armed guard, obtained his security license from the state with the use of a fraudulently signed psychological assessment, and repeatedly gave him weapons training, making him a more effective and dangerous shooter.
His experience includes counseling businesses when employees threaten claims
against them, file claims with the EEOC
against their
former employers, or file lawsuits
alleging the businesses did not comply with the law.
The woman filed a complaint April 19 in Orange County Circuit Court
against her
former employer,
alleging they failed to provide employees their proper wages, benefits and incentives.
Obtained a $ 365,000 settlement for a
former employee who
alleged wrongful discharge and retaliatory harassment in a race and sex discrimination case
against her
former employer and manager.
Obtained a $ 1.4 million verdict (upheld after appeals) for a
former employee who
alleged wrongful discharge and failure to accommodate in a disability discrimination case
against his
former employer and manager.
Obtained a $ 500,000 settlement for a
former employee who
alleged wrongful discharge and breach of contract to pay severance benefits
against his
former employer.
Former employers often file cases against former employees and their new employers alleging breach of non-competition covenants, and the Mavrick Law Firm has successfully defended the new business or new emp
Former employers often file cases
against former employees and their new employers alleging breach of non-competition covenants, and the Mavrick Law Firm has successfully defended the new business or new emp
former employees and their new
employers alleging breach of non-competition covenants, and the Mavrick Law Firm has successfully defended the new business or new
employer.
The wrongful death lawsuit
against the shooter's
former employer, G4S,
alleges that it knew the shooter was mentally unstable and threatening violence, yet obtained his security license from the state with the use of a fraudulently signed psychological assessment, employed him as an armed guard, and repeatedly gave him weapons training.
We have advised a number of individuals who were subjected to disciplinary proceedings on the basis of
alleged regulatory misdemeanours and advised an investment banker dismissed for gross misconduct on his claim
against his
former employer and his application to the FSA for approval for his new role.
Successfully opposed an injunction motion brought by an
employer against its
former employees with respect to
alleged breaches of various restrictive covenants.
Defended breach of fiduciary duty claim by corporation
against its
former CEO arising from CEO's
alleged theft of corporate opportunity and establishment of competing business; after trial, CEO used profits from his new business to acquire his
former employer
The typical case involves an
employer seeking injunctive relief
against a
former employee who is
alleged to be competing or soliciting customers in violation of the restrictive covenant.