Sentences with phrase «against their principles when»

Then again, many Republicans have found it easy to vote against their principles when it comes to a majority black, Democratic New Orleans.

Not exact matches

Now, when we make a decision, (whether we're commissioning a single article or conceiving an overall digital strategy) we test ourselves against those principles.

Plus, all the big - tech platforms have proved they know how to filter out content when it affects their ability to operate somewhere, even if it's against their founding principle that they should serve as an agnostic service.

For now, the best response is that a program such as the above — applied when necessary beyond Iraq, Syria, and ISIS to other challenges against the international order — would buy the Middle East time for the modernization and internal transformation needed to anchor the nation - state principle and provide homegrown disincentives to violence and upheaval.

By the early 20th century, bandwagons were commonplace in political campaigns, and «jump on the bandwagon» had become a derogatory term used to describe the social phenomenon of wanting to be part of the majority even when it means going against one's principles or beliefs.

We know from our own troubled War against Terror, how easy it is, when facing a murderous enemy, to slide from just war principles, into acts of abuse and immorality.

When we sin we act against the principle of love.

But when David writes about «authenticity», freedom, and honesty, and I exercise those principles, some of you jumped right on me — against exactly what David was trying to promote.

In his polemic against Jewish neoconservatives in general and Irving Kristol in particular, for instance, Hertzberg cites the Talmudic principle, «When in doubt, and the leaders confuse you by divided counsel, go into the street and see what the people are doing.»

And when we see what God is doing, we can join with culture in standing against war, hunger, and other forms of inhumanity, but infusing such stands with the principles of the Gospel and the example of Jesus Christ (Resident Aliens, 46 - 47).

I can maybe understand a team sticking to their principles being only one goal down as a game draws to close, but when you're 2 - 0 down with the clock ticking, you clearly need a plan B. Plan A (get into the final third and make as many sideways passes as possible) hadn't worked at all against West Ham, and with say 10 minutes left, I couldn't believe we didn't just stick Mertesacker upfront with Giroud and hit long balls and early crosses!

Even if Wenger did show some interest, it totally goes against Arsenal's principles when it comes to transfers and finances, so based on that I can not see such a link with Arsenal being true.

Prior to this current threat to leave the sport, Ferrari's previous big threat arrived before the 2010 season, when it said that the introduction of a # 40m budget cap would create a «two - tiered formula», which was against its principles.

The principle that children under three should not stay overnight with their separated or divorced fathers, when parents can not agree on co-parenting arrangements, has recently reappeared as an argument against co-residential parenting for very young children.

This position was later confirmed in October 2010 by Xie Zhenghua, China's Head Negotiator on Climate Change and Vice Chairman of the NDRC on occasion of the press conference to the UN Climate Talks in Tianjin, when he noted that «China is for full consultation in the UN framework but we are not against smaller consultations» in the respect of the principles of openness, transparency and full consultation.

There are two principles that give us cause for concern when assessing the intervention against IS: proportionality and non-combatant immunity.

* This is however understandable when you plot that against the Pareto principle.

And when Senator Cruz rails against the New York values, those are the same New York values that most people here are fighting against, and fighting for conservative principles and really sanity in Washington.»

Specifically, any unsolicited actions of others that physically affect an individual's property or person, no matter if the result of those actions is damaging, beneficial, or neutral to the owner, are considered violent or aggressive when they are against the owner's free will and interfere with his right to self - determination and the principle of self - ownership.

This is done against the general principle set out in the Ministerial Code that when Parliament is in Session, the most important announcements of Government policy should be made in the first instance, in Parliament, and taking into account the importance of the issue and the other business before the House.»

But she also has principles, and leaves her top firm for the opposition when a powerful gun group asks her to devise messaging to turn women against universal background checks for gun ownership.

On the basis of «CREATOR principles» previously set by the SoA, demands include that authors should receive «at least» 50 % of the revenue from e-book sales, «not a mere 25 %» they do currently, that authors don't have their «hands tied with contracts that can not be terminated when a book is no longer being exploited», for publishers to drop non-compete clauses and for indemnity clauses, often included to help protect publishers financially against cases brought on the basis of plagarism and libel, «to spread the risk fairly between the publisher and the author».

When you invest your money the principle of compound interest is in your side instead of against you.

And finally, Buffett used his principle of being greedy when others are fearful by purchasing Coca Cola shares at a time when the company was experiencing some short - term problems and a mob mentality had formed against the stock that led to a significantly reduced share price as a result.

HELOCs have a draw period, during which you can borrow against your line of credit, following by a repayment period, when you must pay off the principle as a regularly amortizing loan.

In my own voting, I vote against management when they have not provided an adequate relative return, and vote with them when they have, aside from the principles listed above.

oit is with indignation that we are speaking othis document is not acceptable • Bolivia owe have learned about this document through the media, not through you onow we are given 60 minutes to accept something already agreed upon by other states owe are seeing actions in a dictatorial way othis is unacceptable and anti-democratic owe say to the people of the world: they shall judge upon it othe rights of our people are not being respected owe are not going to decide about so many lives in only 60 minutes othis is s group of a small number of countries oAPPLAUS • Cuba o4 hours ago Obama announced an agreement which is non-existant owe is behaving like an emperor owe have seen version being discussed by secretive groups in the last hours and days oCuba will not accept your draft declaration oat this conference, there is no consensus on this document oI associate my voice to Tuvalu, Venezuela, Bolivia othe target of 2 degrees is unacceptable o... • Costa Rica ofor the reasons that we have heard, this document can not be considered the work of the AWG - LCA and can not be considered by the COP othis can only be an INF doc, it's just for information oadditional question: in an earlier version, a CP.15 - decision, para. 1: there was a reference to a legally binding instrument to be adopted by the COP onow: we have a new version, but the reference to legally binding instrument disappeared • USA o [wants to speak, but point of order by Nicaragua] • Nicaragua othere is already a precedent where we have not been given the right to speech onow that you have mentioned we finally want to speak • Pres. [moving on] oUS does not appear on my list any more, so next one is Sudan • Sudan othere must be something horribly wrong here oI pushed the button when I saw Nicaragua raising their sign in order to support them • Nicaragua othis is a deterioration of the democratic system oand this happens at the most important conference of the UN for many years owe have draft decisions about how to carry forward the process ostates (lists names) have written a submission: • this has not followed the basic principles of the UN • inclusion • bottom up processes • democratic participation • equality of states oduring this consequence, many states expressed their position against such approaches othe only agreement we recognize is??

Surely some part of the «precautionary principle» advises against wasteful expenditure of valuable resources on poorly tested plans when the resources may be needed later for better plans.

While this point might strike some conservatives as a suspicious attempt to smuggle in the «precautionary principle» (a principle my friend Indur Goklany once railed against in a book I commissioned and edited when I was at the Cato Institute), it is intuitively correct once you think about it.

... that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government, for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order; that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself, that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them.

While I appreciate the sentiment behind the precautionary principle, it is pernicious in its application when we don't have enough information (see: the USDA food pyramid, and it's «precaution» against fat, which has increased our carbohydrate intake and therefore the rate of the diseases of civilization).

My first seven years were spent primarily on the defense side, where I developed an intense frustration with insurance carriers who would settle meritless claims for nuisance value when the better long - term view would have been to fight against vexatious litigation as a matter of principle.

The sharing principle was established in the judgment of White v White, when Lord Nicholls stated that tentative views must be checked «against the yardstick of equality», but cautioned that introducing a 50 - 50 division of assets as a starting point would be «impermissible judicial gloss»; introducing a legal provision was a «matter for parliament».

The general principle is that when one party writes a contract, and there is an ambiguity, the ambiguity is interpreted against the interest of the writer (contra proferentem).

It's true, of course, that many disputes settle only when both parties have been so beaten up and impoverished by the adversarial system that they just give up, but that doesn't seem to be a very principled argument against mediation.

Furthermore, although it is true that the procedure laid down in Article 267 TFEU is an instrument for cooperation between the Court of Justice and the national courts, by means of which the former provides the latter with the points of interpretation of EU law necessary in order for them to decide the disputes before them, the fact remains that when there is no judicial remedy under national law against the decision of a court or tribunal of a Member State, that court or tribunal is, in principle, obliged to bring the matter before the Court of Justice under the third paragraph of Article 267 TFEU where a question relating to the interpretation of EU law is raised before it...

If it was not made against the insured during the policy period, then the insurer can disclaim coverage for that reason alone, regardless of when the insured gave notice.1 If the claim was made during the policy period but the insured gave notice after the expiration of the requisite time frame for notice under the policy, then the ability to disclaim coverage will turn on whether the notice provisions are conditions precedent or covenants.2 This principle applies regardless of whether the policy is a claims - made or a claims - made - and - reported and reported.3 If the notice provisions are covenants, then late notice constitutes a breach of the policy by the insured, triggering application of Md..

The Court's own reasoning appears at paragraph 392 where it is said that the rationale of immunity remains the par in parem principle and that «the common law rule as to waiver is consonant with elementary good sense by requiring an unequivocal submission to the jurisdiction of the forum state at the time when the forum's state's jurisdiction is invoked against the impleaded state.

In Young, the Supreme Court of Canada establishes the governing principles for when a court may award costs personally against a lawyer.

Stare decisis's most prominent cost is binding judges to interpretations of law that they find unpersuasive, raising the fundamental question of when and why such a restraint on judges» decision - making autonomy is justified.30 In an ideal world, stare decisis would insulate valid principles of law from arbitrary and unprincipled revision without entrenching «bad» precedent against further review.31 In reality, stare decisis hinders defection from both appealing and unappealing precedent.

The claimants submitted, inter alia, that the orders: (i) had been made without any prior consultation as to the principle, relying upon the common law duty to act fairly and / or the doctrine of procedural legitimate expectation; and (ii) were irrational on the basis that the reasons which had been put forward by the defendants in justification of the decision were inconsistent and contradictoryDyson LJ: The fact that, when conferring on the lord chancellor the power to prescribe court fees, parliament had decided whom he should consult before doing so, militated strongly against the idea that there should co-exist a common law duty to consult more widely (in the absence of a clear promise by the lord chancellor that there would be wider consultation and in the absence of any clear established practice of wider consultation).

The principle issue arising on the application was whether, and if so, when, a claim by a company against its auditors would infringe the maxim ex turpi causa non oritur actio.

The transaction also took an interesting twist when the Tims board said even if they reached an acceptable price it would have some core principles they would want to see made part of the agreement and the ongoing enforceable obligation against Burger King in terms of how Tim Hortons would be operated for a period of time.

When parsing New Haven insurance quotes, strive to obey these two principles: First, get yourself covered against potentially likely catastrophes (such as the premises liabilities scenario just outlined); second, seek to minimize what you pay for your coverage by exploring discounts, raising your deductible (if appropriate), and being smart about how you shop for quotes.

In addition, domestic courts also have jurisdiction over similar facts, including under the principle of universality, at least when they amount to crimes against humanity, genocide and war crimes.

Star Cards, especially when upgraded to their maximum level, provide overwhelming boost to abilities, which is against the principles «fair» free - to - play multiplayer game.

The NIC Principles are of concern when measured against international human rights standards and strategies for economic and social development.

When balanced against principles such as the protection of territorial integrity, the international community is highly unlikely to recognise secessionist movements in States that are conducting themselves in good faith.

While formal mechanisms like the Indigenous Child Placement Principle have been established in all jurisdictions, it is hard to have firm confidence in guarantees against repetition when nationally only 62 % of all Indigenous children are placed in accordance with this principle.

The Court determined that the Act did not vary the traditional rules of vicarious liability (or, when an owner can be liable for the actions of its employees) and so directed the appellate court to consider the allegations against the Broker under the traditional principles of vicarious liability.