Sentences with phrase «against this rule when»

Later on she finds out that prior to her death, her friend was using a Ouija board alone, which is strictly against the rules when contacting the spirit world.

I went against this rule when I found this car.

Not exact matches

Delta's other trade victory came on Friday, when, in a surprise decision, the U.S. International Trade Commission ruled against Boeing in a bitter trade battle in which the Chicago - based company said its business was harmed by trade practices of its Canadian rival Bombardier.

Last July, the European Commission opened an unprecedented investigation into the rule of law in Poland — a procedure that is started when there are concerns that a particular country is going against the EU's democratic values.

In fact, in 2014 when the last major cases involving such infringements were decided, the court ruled unanimously against patent trolls.

«When one court in a Democratic - leaning state inevitably rules against Trump, everyone in Canada will go, «See!

Wheeler's decision to stick with the voluntary protocol by stepping down when a new president is elected likely spells a quick death for his major communications policies, including net neutrality rules that prohibit discrimination against Internet sites and services.

Earlier this month when asked by The Washington Post, he didn't rule out the possibility of running against Trump in 2020 — something he has repeatedly alluded to in different ways.

This president rages on Twitter when courts have the temerity to rule against him and when journalists do their jobs by questioning him.

When the International Trade Court ruled in favor of plaintiffs Suniva and SolarWorld in their case against cheap Chinese solar module and cell imports, reactions were polarized: the U.S. solar industry was outraged — as it had been for most of the duration of the court investigation — and investors, apparently, were extremely upbeat for the future of this same outraged industry, sending solar stocks sky - high.

The Department of Justice defended the rule when it filed papers in July in a Washington district court arguing against the case filed by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.

When Europe recently renewed its own anti-dumping measures against Chinese steel, it ensured that these were in accordance with WTO rules and specifically targeting China.

I have no intention of going totally legit when it comes to London's road rules — not until they stop being so hopelessly stacked against cyclists.

After the Supreme Court in 1911 struck down the form of resale price maintenance enabled by fair trade laws, 59 Congress in 1937 carved out an exception for state fair trade laws through the Miller - Tydings Act.60 When the Supreme Court in 1951 ruled that producers could enforce minimum prices only against those retailers that had signed contracts agreeing to do so, 61 Congress responded with a law making minimum prices enforceable against nonsigners too.62

The National Labor Relations Board recently upheld a decision by an administrative law judge against Chipotle that ruled the company violated an employee's right to complain about his job when it required him delete tweets that were critical of the company and then subsequently fired him.

Popular financial radio show host Dave Ramsey caused a firestorm on Twitter last week when he weighed in against the «fiduciary rule» — the controversial pending Department of Labor regulation that would impose new restrictions on a vast swath of financial professionals who handle IRAs and 401 (k) accounts.

Given the Supreme Court of Canada's recent ruling upholding New Brunswick's right to restrict Quebec beer being transported into the province, it's hard to imagine the court ruling against British Columbia when it comes to toxic bitumen.

Also, Rhode Islanders were among the first colonists to take action against British rule when they attacked and burned the British revenue vessel, the sloop Liberty, in Newport on July 19, 1769.

Gold may offer a hedge against inflation, but there are some specific rules to be aware of when investing in precious metals through a self - directed IRA.

Let's hope that when the Supreme Court hears oral arguments on the case on October 2, the Justices will side with regular working people like Hobson, not with the big bosses and corporations who want to use the fine print to rig the rules against the rest of us.

Thrivent Financial for Lutherans became the sixth plaintiff to lob a complaint against the Department of Labor's fiduciary rule when the insurer filed a suit in late September challenging the class - action waiver requirement under the rule's best interest contract exemption, or BICE.

We here in Yemen our Unity day celebration is on 22 May since 1990 to date but this time because of the troubles in the country related to changes we are threatened by the oppositions that they would make of it a bloody date marching towards the presidency to remove the president against the will of many who prefer having the president finish his legal ruling period rather than those coming to rule by coup rather than legal honest elections... Honestly what a mess we are in by those oppositions who what to take over what the youth have achieved and will be using those youth as their slaughter sheep for them to reach the ruling chair and then again when they both oppositions fight among them over it...

The Republican Party is most vulnerable because the Religious Right, a substantial voting bloc, is adamantly against gambling, This was evident recently in an Alabama gubernatorial primary race, when the challenger said that he «would not rule out new gambling rules» and lost, while Governor Fob James agreed to almost all of the right's social agenda, and won renomination.

When the rebel blasphemes against the «old god» who sanctions the established order ruled over by death, it is to make God share «in the same humiliating adventure as mankind's» (Rb 24).

CNN: Split ruling on discrimination against UK Christians A British Christian woman suffered religious discrimination when British Airways told her not to wear a visible cross over her uniform, a top European court ruled Tuesday.

Oh boy, care to explain how you think one small ruling is going to impact the Constitution when so much has already gone against the hype of your belief system?

Too often the debate between a Bernard of Clairvaux and a Peter Abelard is read in terms of the latter's so - called heterodoxy when it was just as much about Bernard's progressive vision of a church disentangled from the control of secular princes over against Abelard's more conservative view of an ordered relation of patronage and rule between secular rulers and sacred institutions.

What happens to the rule of law when law is divorced from, indeed pitted against, the first political institution?

There was a time when SOME of these «rules» may have been practical or had a logical reason for them in that time period (for example, the rules against eating certain animals could easily be explained by diseases that were not understood then that were commonly acquired by people that ate them.)

A lot has been said but Sikhs are following the rules, have been doing so and will continue to do so yet so many comments against Sikhs saying that they have no right to refuse to take the turban off or telling them to comply when they have already been complying and they do have the right to refuse to take their turban off, that's all, sme as you have th right to tell people to return their passports and leave America.

When confronting insurance companies and federal family - planning guidelines, the ACOG has argued against «gag rules» that inhibit free communication between physician and patient.

If one really wants to live by the Golden Rule they will inform someone when they are sinning against God.

It is therefore helpful, when considering the subject of rebellion against the rule or authority of God, to look beyond the human being, the pinnacle of God's creation, as you quite rightly pointed out in one of your fora.

That number one evolutionary rule of survival is «When Death is at your doorstep and has chained you to the walls without seeing the light of Creation or that which can be created then the human must fight against Death and invent new ways of defeating Death and his minions.»

When this order of reign was disturbed by the «despotic rule», the prophets resisted against the kings.

Isn't it interesting how angry the militant atheist crowd becomes when a ruling goes against their «beliefs»???

Isn't it interesting how angry the militant Christian crowd becomes when a ruling goes against their «beliefs» like for gay rights and abortion???

As a general rule of thumb, I would say that religions are at their best whenever they challenge their members to chafe against preexisting identities — for example, when St. Paul says that «in Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female.»

After failed earlier efforts, the Hungarians revolted against Hapsburg rule in 1848 (a year when there were revolutions all over Europe), and this time they succeeded, the whole business ending in the «Great Austro «Hungarian Compromise» of 1867.

When I am tempted to sin, the Holy Spirit warns me that such is wrong — not a remembrance of some religious rule against sin.

... and this is why this country is so backwards and falling behind the rest of the post-industrial countries... and why is it that these... nuts... will use rules of evidence and «science» to back claims of biblical proof... but reject the same critria when it is used against them?

ive been wrestling since i was 9 years old and when i went into high school i had to wrestle a girl... growing up learning to wrestle i had ended up having violent style, i never was dirty or broke rules but i was taught to do anything in your power to win whehter it was to club down the head or grab the throat to gain position etc. unfortunately i was in the postion to wrestle a girl once and at the time i did nt care who you were boy / girl, white / black / purple it did nt matter im was going to go out there bounce your head of the mat and bury you, so i went out there and wreslted the same way i always wrestled, 110 % and always to put your oppenents back through the mat i dditn change my style at all bc she was a girl i wrestled the same against everyone but after i pinned her in the first minute i did nt even realize that i broke her ribs when i power doubled through her, now after that for the rest of the tournament i was heckled and berated for forcefully beating a girl ppl were telling my parents «hey, looks like you raised a wife beater» etc. etc.... ever since then i refused to wrestle girls and thank go i eventually grew out of the lower weights, moral of the story is that is great and all that girls are wrestling but they shouldnt wrestle boys even if they know what they are getting into because 1.

Witness, for example, what becomes of the Golden Rule when Matthew Hale, leader of the World Church of the Creator, says that whatever is for the white race is good and whatever is against the white race is evil, is sin.

When that people nevertheless rebelled against God's rule, he constantly wept and worried over them, repeatedly forgiving their waywardness and sending them prophets to speak his words of judgment and mercy.

When providing a warranty against defects, you must also comply with the broader requirements of the ACL, in particular the rules against misleading or deceptive conduct and false or misleading claims.

Whereas when Anderlecht came back from three down against us, their first goal should have been ruled out for clear offside and they would never have got their momentum started.

Now, ahead of the Japanese GP, the FIA has clarified that the thing that was against the rules is still against the rules, only now they're actually going to take action when people break it, which begs the question: if they weren't going to bother enforcing the rule, why did it exist in the first place?

This sort of thing is always going to happen when teams are allowed to have a say in the rules because obviously, they'll vote against anything which doesn't benefit them.

Just analyze Wenger's statement today, «I didn't come out against Benzema», its not the same as saying that I did not show or I don't have any interest in Benzema, and to top it off when ask about ruling out any future purchases (this within the context of an additional striker) Arsene pointed out what he currently has at his disposal and think they are sufficient, while adding that if an opportunity to strengthen presents itself, he would not be adverse to pursue it; this seems a bit contradictory and points to someone who is being a bit evasive.

We do know the rules, though, and have to accept it when, say, a goal we really wanted is ruled offside correctly, as Mustafi's header against Chelsea was this weekend.