Sentences with phrase «against those claims if»

Better yet, it also provides a defense against those claims if you're sued, as well as takes care of negotiating settlements when possible or necessary.

It even pays to defend you against those claims if there's a claim the policy would cover once proven!

You are well advised to consider what might be necessary to pay for your own defense against the claim if it becomes necessary to do so, of course, but nothing is being denied.

It even pays to defend you against those claims if there's a claim the policy would cover once proven!

Your Long Beach renters insurance will even cover the costs of defending against that claim if necessary, saving you a ton of money on potential legal fees.

Not exact matches

Nearly half of HR professionals claim their organization previously had a policy against rehiring former employees — even if the employee left in good standing — yet 76 % are more accepting of hiring boomerang employees today than in the past.

If those efforts fail, by using our Site or other online service, you agree that any complaint, dispute, or disagreement you may have against NBCUniversal, and any claim that NBCUniversal may have against you, arising out of, relating to, or connected in any way with these Terms of Service, our Privacy Policy, or any NBCUniversal Transactions or Relationships shall be resolved exclusively by final and binding arbitration («Arbitration») administered by JAMS or its successor («JAMS») and conducted in accordance with the JAMS Streamlined Arbitration Rules And Procedures in effect at the time the Arbitration is initiated or, if the amount in controversy exceeds $ 100,000, in accordance with the JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules And Procedures then in effect (respectively, the «Applicable Rules»If those efforts fail, by using our Site or other online service, you agree that any complaint, dispute, or disagreement you may have against NBCUniversal, and any claim that NBCUniversal may have against you, arising out of, relating to, or connected in any way with these Terms of Service, our Privacy Policy, or any NBCUniversal Transactions or Relationships shall be resolved exclusively by final and binding arbitration («Arbitration») administered by JAMS or its successor («JAMS») and conducted in accordance with the JAMS Streamlined Arbitration Rules And Procedures in effect at the time the Arbitration is initiated or, if the amount in controversy exceeds $ 100,000, in accordance with the JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules And Procedures then in effect (respectively, the «Applicable Rules»if the amount in controversy exceeds $ 100,000, in accordance with the JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules And Procedures then in effect (respectively, the «Applicable Rules»).

«Requiring the banks to pay treble damages to every plaintiff who ended up on the wrong side of an independent Libor ‐ denominated derivative swap would, if appellants» allegations were proved at trial, not only bankrupt 16 of the world's most important financial institutions, but also vastly extend the potential scope of antitrust liability in myriad markets where derivative instruments have proliferated,» the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York said in the ruling.A U.S. appeals court on Monday revived private antitrust litigation accusing major banks of conspiring to manipulate the Libor benchmark interest rate, in a big setback for their defense against investors» claims of market - rigging.

KNIGHT: You can ask if there are any outstanding legal claims against it, especially on the malpractice front.

Our philosophy is to work closely with a customer to resolve issues if they are encountered, however we will also strongly defend ourselves against claims that are unjust or lack merit.

If your bank has exhausted all avenues for recovering the debt but still has not recovered the full amount of the loan, they can make a claim to the Small Business Administration against the guarantee the administration put on the loan.

If we terminate Mr. Drexler's employment without cause or he terminates his employment with good reason, Mr. Drexler will be entitled to receive (i) a payment of his earned but unpaid annual base salary through the termination date, any accrued vacation pay and any un-reimbursed expenses, and (ii) subject to Mr. Drexler's execution of a valid general release and waiver of claims against us, as well as his compliance with the non-competition, non-solicitation and confidential information restrictions described below, (a) a payment equal to his annual base salary and target cash incentive award, one - half of such payment to be paid on the first business day that is six (6) months and one (1) day following the termination date and the remaining one - half of such payment to be paid in six equal monthly installments commencing on the first business day of the seventh calendar month following the termination date, (b) a payment equal to the product of (x) the last annual cash incentive award Mr. Drexler received prior to the termination date and (y) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days of service completed by Mr. Drexler in the year of termination and the denominator of which is 365, such amount to be paid on the first business day that is six (6) months and one (1) day following the termination date, and (c) the immediate vesting of such portion of unvested restricted shares and stock options as provided and pursuant to the terms of the relevant grant agreements under our 2003 Equity Incentive Plan.

He told the audience that if they want to do something to help journalists, they should support blog TechDirt and its founder Mike Masnick, who is being sued by the same lawyer who led Hogan's lawsuit against Gawker over stories TechDirt published about Shiva Ayyadurai, who claims to have invented email.

The lawsuit, which claims Levandowski had a long relationship with Uber before leaving Alphabet, could severely handicap the company's autonomous efforts if a judge rules against Uber.

Tokens, if indeed they are investment contracts, are not typical investment contracts like stock or debt in that they do not represent a claim against the company, but rather they represent an ability to write to some data structure that the company has built (in common market practice).

As a result, if the entrepreneur's new startup derives in any way from work for a previous employer, the previous employer may have a claim for infringement of their intellectual property rights against the new business.

However, if FHA lenders have too many claims against FHA insurance, they can lose their FHA approval.

If your software fails because of, say, a DDoS attack resulting in your paying users being unable to market to their customers, each of your users potentially has a claim against your company for the revenue they lost when your service went down.

If you have filed a claim against the Employee Trust, you can expect to receive one of the following documents from the Monitor:

If you received Medicaid, the state can make a claim against your estate for any money spent on your medical care after age 55.

BUT... if the Church is going to claim and treat sexual deviance (if in fact that is what they believe it is) with such force over and against all other indiscretions, how do they justify that... and how isn't it hypocritical of them when they simply wink at other things that are clearly outlined by Jesus» own words as grievous.

If I understand this correctly, these christian groups are claiming that granting equal rights to everyone is somehow discriminating against them??? Sounds par for the course.

If you're going to claim that we need an objective reason to evaluate morals against, I would then say that no one has this objective standard until they demonstrate that they do.

Muchembled explains both the development of dueling among the nobility and rural revolts against the centralization of authority as reactions against state repression of traditional codes of violence: «In each case, the participants claimed an eminent right to a straight fight, even if it resulted in the death of the adversary.»

If I am presented with claims that the variety of uses of «experience» does not and could not reveal any normative essence of experience, I can counter that I have a prelinguistic intuition of the essence of my own experience — an intuition against which the adequacy or confusion of language can be authoritatively measured.

Given that much of it is private, most people here can rest assured in the knowledge that if her claims did not hold up against this evidence, these people would speak out publicly here and / or privately to Julie.

And if Judas knew of Jesus» claim to be Messiah, why was this testimony not produced against Jesus at his examination before the high priest?

In the pages of the Wall Street Journal, Peggy Noonan wonders if a string of failures for the Obama administration counts as mounting evidence not only against his primary claim to rule, executive competence, but also against the undergirding premises of liberal political philosophy.

Because despite our best intentions, if used wrong, we are in danger of perpetuating the problem we claim to be fighting against.

It may indeed seem that what I have done so far is to offer a tentative argument against the claims of an exemplarist interpretation of Christ's work, namely, that if he is offered us as an exemplar his experience is in crucial respects too relative and limited to offer a wholly significant guide - post to men and women in all the circumstances of their lives.

However, even if successful they will never be able to claim ultimate victory in their war against the poor unless we fall into the trap of looking at history through the policymakers» distorted lenses.»

And he pushed back against what he sees as increasing secularism in the world, saying, «I consider that the dedication of this church of the Sagrada Familia is an event of great importance, at a time in which man claims to be able to build his life without God, as if God had nothing to say to him.»

If, then, they claim, debates about the propriety of particular wars are begun by stating a general presumption against war, this will be to skew the debate and to misrepresent the tradition.

If recent claims [1] made against Planned Parenthood by the Alliance Defense Fund («ADF») and the American Center for Law and Justice («ACLJ») are accurate, a simple answer solves a prior mystery.

If recent claims [1] made against Planned Parenthood by the Alliance Defense Fund («ADF») and the American Center for Law and Justice («ACLJ») are...

In the ensuing international backlash against the bill, Lively claimed that he did not support the death penalty for hom.ose.xuality but that if the «offending sections» were modified, the proposed law criminalizing hom.ose.xuality «would be an encouraging step in the right direction.»

In fact, it seems fair to say that the most common criticism process theists level against the God of classical free will theism is the claim that if such a being really existed and were wholly good, we should expect to see displays of divine coercive power more often.

If we should discover mistakes in the scriptures of their religions or should observe the misconduct of their followers we should not attribute these defaults and shortcomings to the founders of those religions, inasmuch as the perversion of scriptures is possible and it is possible that mistakes of interpretation might find their way into the commentaries, but it is not at all possible that a person should fabricate lies against God and should claim to be a prophet and should put forward his own compositions as the word of God falsely and yet God should grant him respite like the righteous and should bestow upon him wide acceptance by people (Tohfa Qaisariyyah, p. g 10).

If that is true, then there are no logical grounds upon which an individual or a minority can claim rights against the majority.

I would say to anyone out there that claims they are not bigoted but merely taking a godly stand against what they believe to be sinful, If you want to honestly examine it, the next time you are going to say something to a homosexual, treat them a certain way, or argue that certain rights should be denied them, ask yourself a few simple questions.

In Just War Against Terror Elshtain argues «that true international justice is defined as the equal claim of all persons in the world to having coercive force deployed in their behalf if they are victims of one of the many horrors attendant upon radical political instability....

If you are so easily shaken by the claims of Christians that you lash out against them, then you aren't an atheist at all.

What is even more terrifying is if any Muslim that practices Islam... has a grudge against any Christian... what's stopping them from making a false claim against a Christian, of blasphemy?

If we look at our own history, we have inquisition and counter-inquisition to remind us that the claim to know and execute God's will has very often turned out to mean serving our own end and our own will, and has been used to justify crimes of all kinds against our neighbors.74

If it was my son, I wouldn't let him wrestle unless the girl signed a complete, ironclad release of any possible claims against the boy.

Paul Tillich enunciated the «open Christian» commitment to freedom in that «Protestant principle» which, as he wrote, «contains the divine and human protest against any absolute claim made for a relative reality, even if this claim is made by a Protestant church.

NOT HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS, BUT ORGANIZERS OF GENOCIDE AGAINST WHITES AND SPONSORS OF BOGUS «MULTICULTURALISM» $ $ $ CLAIMS AT EXPENSE OF PERSECUTED WHITES (while minorities are awarded for and instructed by governments in bogus human rights claims, whites are simply killed if not perverted in multiculturalism garbaCLAIMS AT EXPENSE OF PERSECUTED WHITES (while minorities are awarded for and instructed by governments in bogus human rights claims, whites are simply killed if not perverted in multiculturalism garbaclaims, whites are simply killed if not perverted in multiculturalism garbage)!!!

If you believe that fooling a woman's system to avoid pregnancy is against your moral code then fine, we'll agree to disagree on the evils of foiling God's plan for every coupling to produce a child, but to claim the pill is abortion is just sad.

All that would be claimed is this: If we engage in the practice of theological education, then we commit ourselves to the view that it is possible to make truth claims about God and to weigh arguments in favor of and against them, even if they never are and perhaps never can be «knock down» decisive argumentIf we engage in the practice of theological education, then we commit ourselves to the view that it is possible to make truth claims about God and to weigh arguments in favor of and against them, even if they never are and perhaps never can be «knock down» decisive argumentif they never are and perhaps never can be «knock down» decisive arguments.

What can be our defense against tribalism if we permit discussion of the truthfulness of our various claims?