I suspect my
prejudices against traditional publishing make it difficult for me to envision that or even co-publishing as viable, artistically or financially, so I'll bow to your (and Kevin's) broader perspectives on this one.
Um... Congradulations??? I'm sorry to be so hesitant right now but I just have previous posts and interviews in my head where your tone or comments seemed
kinda against traditional publishing.
We have surveyed 1,800 of our 25,0000 authors in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Germany, and Scandinavia... About one - third of the authors we surveyed made a conscious
choice against traditional publishing... We can identify three big groups.
Wideman decided
against a traditional publishing contract — and royalty advance — for Briefs because he wanted more control over the publishing process and to develop a more direct connection with his readers.
A lot of the news we're hearing these days is less focused on how digital publishing stacks up
against traditional publishing, and more more concerned with the format coming into its own, taking advantage of social media, internet marketing, and developments like the cloud.
It's not that I am
against traditional publishing.
To be clear, I'm not
against traditional publishing.
On reading this blog, you might think I am
against traditional publishing.