Sentences with phrase «against truth claims»

Academic freedom that's officially indifferent to truth or about «the free marketplace of ideas» always serves the forces of progressivist liberation; it implies, as John Stuart Mill seems to teach, a strong bias against truth claims that limit personal freedom or, as our Supreme Court now says, relational autonomy.

Not exact matches

As the crowd chanted for the media to «tell the truth,» Trump again reiterated his claims against the press.

Definitely not the Chinese economy is heading for a hard landing, because what he claimed fundamentally goes against the truth.

This is what helps you to understand that the account is the truth, that when you claim «nothing» can do the impossible, and then claim God can't do something relatively insignificant compared to that, then you are being very biased against God, and giving incredible amounts of credit to «nothing» at the same time... that is unrealistic in the extreme.

It is one thing to offend by speaking truth, that'll happen, but any other type of offence is unnecessary and against the teachings (which show God's heart on the matter) in scripture for those who claim to «know Him».

You have made this claim against me on more than one occasion but the truth of the matter is that we are talking about two totally different concepts.

It was confidently claimed that in the distant past, God had revealed the truth on various issues to men like Moses, the prophets, the apostles and above all through Jesus Christ His Son, and it was therefore impossible for puny man to pit his intelligence against God, and further it was blasphemous even to question truth that was divinely revealed.

You will rant and rave against the truth, claim others are insane or delusional, and this shows there isn't any fruit at your location.

But a just appreciation of God's general revelation of Himself should preserve the truth that Christianity has meaning for man precisely because it represents a fulfillment of the knowledge of God which is made possible through all the things which He has made, Nygren claims, of course, simply to be setting forth scientifically the fundamental Christian motif without arguing its truth or value against any other motif.

His selection for the Nobel Prize in 1957 was an official endorsement of this effort to defend the human person against the claims of strong gods in any guise, even in the garb of moral truth.

Wounded as it has been by the absolutist claims of 20th - century totalitarianism, contemporary consensus demotes truth — on the one hand to something purely subjective (signifying fidelity solely to one's own sentiments and often offending against the principle of non-contradiction), on the other to the merely convenient (namely, to «what works»).

In all honesty, the «religious people» that don't legislate against things based solely on their religious convictions and thereby hurt the rights of individuals, and who don't condemn science and medicine and societal progression and other religions and other denominations and people who are not religious, and who don't claim to know that something is true beyond all other truths, are probably a very slim minority, and I'd have to argue that they aren't really religious, they are just doing whatever makes them feel good, which could be accomplished through secular means as well.

Pannenberg engaged in extended polemics against the limits of reason to which so much of Protestant theology had appealed, opening the door to renewal of the bolder claims of Christian theology to affirm universal truth and to encompassing the sciences.

Instead of emphasizing the universal truth - claim exerted by the Bible upon the mind and conscience of all humankind, one spokesperson after another fulminates against evangelical «rationalism» and retreats to personal commitment.

All that would be claimed is this: If we engage in the practice of theological education, then we commit ourselves to the view that it is possible to make truth claims about God and to weigh arguments in favor of and against them, even if they never are and perhaps never can be «knock down» decisive arguments.

you claim to be proclaiming the «bitter truth» but the fact is that last season they only lost one single match at home and it was against Chelsea (you know, the team that has already won the PL in your eyes);

Multimedia carried a story on their platforms in 2010 claiming some individuals in GREDA had received death threats hence the withdrawal of their petition against the STX deal only for GREDA to come out and tell the world that there was no iota of truth in that report because they only withdrew their petition after meeting parliament and getting a better understanding of the whole deal.

The prohibition of denial of clearly established historical facts about crimes against humanity constitutes in itself a protection of truth (which the victims of crimes against humanity have a right to claim in the court).

Now the trust has responded, claiming the government has waged a campaign against the school that has been «been characterised by misrepresentation, half truths and inaccuracies».

Suddenly, we seem to live in a time dominated by «fake news», «alternative facts», conspiracy theories, scepticism of scientific research, partial accounts parading as «the real truth which has hitherto been concealed from us, the people», revolts against allegedly smug academic elites and distant political elites — a time where YouTube videos claiming research into climate change to be a scam get far more viewers than videos presenting the science of climate change.

Better than sixty photographs help make the case that, playing against the viewer's expectation of photography's truth claim, artists could make pictures that upend our trust in the knowable world.

CNS and Morano were the first source in May 2004 of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth claims against John Kerry in the 2004 presidential election [3] and in January 2006 of similar smears against Vietnam war veteran John Murtha.

IIRC, the judge in the ruling against An Inconvenient Truth being shown in schools said it wasn't science and if it was shown had to be presented with the claims corrected, there were several points.

If this is also true of the real system, it seems that it would amplify the point of your original claim against truth - centrism («First, since we don't know the truth (in the widest sense) we have no possible way of generating models that scatter evenly about it.»).

By way of example, Truth Legal brought a personal injury claim against a wealthy celebrity as a result of an assault the celebrity committed on our client.

The truth is that while a subcontractor who is injured on the job will have a harder time recovering compensation than an employee, they still have the option of filing a negligence claim against the party or parties who's negligence caused their injury (if one exists).

In claims against professionals, such as claims against solicitors for errors that they have made when running your personal injury claims, Truth Legal may offer you a No Win, No Fee agreement to pursue your claim, if you do not have the benefit of Legal Expenses Insurance.

Worthy v World Wide Financial Services, Inc 192 Fed Appx 369 (July 28, 2006)(affirming decision to dismiss claims arising under federal Truth - in - Lending Act and Michigan's Secondary Mortgage Loan Act against client)

Allowing «lying» lawsuits opens the door for suits against candidates and groups that: knowingly lie about their opponent; technically tell the truth; tell the truth but are sued anyway to intimidate and defund them, and; counter-sue, claiming its the other side whose pants are on fire.

They have been known to accuse Jennifer Collins, the daughter of Holly Collins, and now an aged - out adult child of a family court system that terrorized her and her brother by shifting custody to their abusive father when he successfully utilized false claims of Parental Alienation Syndrome against their protective mother, of lying, even though their is hard evidence to corroborate the truths the Collins kids (now adults) tell.

Closing Disclosure statement - details all funds changing hands between the buyer and seller Truth in Lending statement - a final summary of the terms of your loan Mortgage note - a legal obligation to repay the lender according to stated terms Deed of trust - the legal transfer of ownership; gives the lender a claim against your home if you fail to meet the terms of the mortgage note Affidavits - any binding statements by the buyer or seller Riders - any contract amendments that impact your rights Any additional documents required in your state