Sentences with phrase «age distribution results»

Not exact matches

Investors who hold the fund within a tax - advantaged retirement account should consult their tax advisors to discuss tax consequences that could result if payments are distributed from their account prior to age 59 1/2 or if they plan to use the fund, in whole or in part, to meet their required minimum distribution (RMD) obligations.

Qualified Roth IRA distributions are tax - free provided a Roth account has been open for more than five years and the owner is at least age 59 1/2, or as a result of their death, disability, or using the first - time homebuyer exception.

As we age, melanocyte distribution becomes less regular and organised, resulting in excessive pigmentation known as hyperpigmentation.

The limitations of the skinfold technique are well known, and the results tend to vary according to age, sex, distribution of fat, and measurement technique (13).

The age distribution was narrow (< 5 years) and also did not affect the results.

Something else that happens as a result of that is probably the Social Security payments maybe a little bit less, which means your taxable income will be lower, which might allow you to do more Roth conversions before you hit your required minimum distributions at age 70 and a half, and so the main part of this question is what's the best way to transfer these these retirement accounts to the kids.

Failure to take required minimum distributions at that age results in a 50 % excise tax on the amounts not distributed.

Investors who hold the fund within a tax - advantaged retirement account should consult their tax advisors to discuss tax consequences that could result if payments are distributed from their account prior to age 59 1/2 or if they plan to use the fund, in whole or in part, to meet their required minimum distribution (RMD) obligations.

As a result, you must use an annuity like an IRA - type vehicle because early distributions prior to age 59 1/2 may be subject to early withdrawal penalty of 10 % like an IRA.

Normally, any distribution (other than specifically - qualified distributions) prior to age 59 1/2 will result in the 10 % penalty being applied, in addition to regular income -LSB-...]

Italians have been slow to embrace online travel purchases for diverse reasons: broadband penetration is low and still relatively expensive; they are by nature hesitant to release personal information over the Internet; traditional offline players have powerful ties and still sell the vast majority of travel related products; tour operators have been cautious about challenging conventional distribution channels; credit card usage is still relatively low and most credit cards have limited spending margins per month and the country's population is aging rapidly, resulting in slower adoption of the Internet than other markets.

Here, thickness data, which are sorely lacking but available in a few locations as the result of International Polar Year efforts and from satellite - derived estimates of ice age or type, constrain modeled thickness distributions.

But the problem as I see it is that whilst it is probably realistic to assume that some kind of local uniformity results from that process, that doesn't tell you what calendar ages it spans nor what the shape of the distribution in that region is.

Which means for the time being, those who own life insurance and are approaching the maturity age of their life insurance policy really do face the potentially «taxing» problem of outliving their insurance coverage, and being impacted by the resulting taxable event of receiving the policy's proceeds as a living distribution!

It is not known whether the observed differential enhancement of number of deaths by age resulted in a biased age distribution in the enhanced dataset, or served to correct a reporting bias in the original dataset.

The purpose of the current report is to present nationally representative estimates of lifetime prevalence and age - of - onset distributions of the DSM - IV disorders assessed in the recently completed National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS - R).1 While the Epidemiological Catchment Area Study2 and the baseline National Comorbidity Survey (NCS) 3 both reported high lifetime prevalence and generally early age - of - onset distributions of most DSM - III (NCS) and DSM - III - R (NCS - R) disorders, it is not clear whether similar results will hold for DSM - IV disorders because of the greater emphasis on clinically significant distress and impairment in DSM - IV than in earlier editions.

We compared results for daily smokers with those from Australian ITC Project surveys, which were directly standardised to the distribution of age and sex of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander smokers reported in the 2008 NATSISS.

As the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population is much younger than the general Australian population, we weighted the Australian ITC Project results to the distribution of age (18 — 24, 25 — 34, 35 — 44, 45 — 54, ≥ 55 years), sex and smoking status (smoker, ex-smoker, never - smoker) in the total Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population in the 2008 NATSISS, analogous to direct standardised comparisons.

In making an equitable apportionment of marital property, the family court must give weight in such proportion as it finds appropriate to all of the following factors: (1) the duration of the marriage along with the ages of the parties at the time of the marriage and at the time of the divorce; (2) marital misconduct or fault of either or both parties, if the misconduct affects or has affected the economic circumstances of the parties or contributed to the breakup of the marriage; (3) the value of the marital property and the contribution of each spouse to the acquisition, preservation, depreciation, or appreciation in value of the marital property, including the contribution of the spouse as homemaker; (4) the income of each spouse, the earning potential of each spouse, and the opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets; (5) the health, both physical and emotional, of each spouse; (6) either spouse's need for additional training or education in order to achieve that spouse's income potential; (7) the non marital property of each spouse; (8) the existence or nonexistence of vested retirement benefits for each or either spouse; (9) whether separate maintenance or alimony has been awarded; (10) the desirability of awarding the family home as part of equitable distribution or the right to live therein for reasonable periods to the spouse having custody of any children; (11) the tax consequences to each or either party as a result of equitable apportionment; (12) the existence and extent of any prior support obligations; (13) liens and any other encumbrances upon the marital property and any other existing debts; (14) child custody arrangements and obligations at the time of the entry of the order; and (15) such other relevant factors as the trial court shall expressly enumerate in its order.

Since one interaction parameter CU × ODD achieved significant results (social cognition, p =.05), single effects were estimated and interpreted (for children with ODD = absent, ODD = present, low CU score - percentile 25 of the distribution - and high CU score - percentile 75): high CU raw scores were associated with high scores in social cognition difficulties at age 4, but only for children without ODD at age 3.

You can also qualify for a tax - free distribution after five years if you take it as the result of being disabled or use it for a first - time purchase of a home, no matter what your age.